← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

glyvis vs ibdsim2

A side-by-side editorial comparison of glyvis and ibdsim2 — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

glyvis vs ibdsim2: at a glance

Featureglyvisibdsim2
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesglycomics, visualization, ggplot2, bioconductorstatistical-genetics, pedigree-analysis, simulation, r-packages
Last editorial update40m ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is glyvis?

glyvis keeps losing plot functions as the packages behind them get reorganized.

glyvis is the plotting layer for glycoverse results. Its recent releases are dominated by two forces it does not control: glyexp's container migration, which it absorbed in 0.7.0 by accepting SummarizedExperiment inputs, and glystats' function removals, which cost it first the WGCNA and consensus-clustering autoplot methods and then the entire enrichment plotting surface. Its own additions in the window are narrow, mostly label handling and NA robustness.

Read the full glyvis trajectory →

What is ibdsim2?

A pedigree IBD simulator that absorbed its own web app and now optimises for dense marker panels.

ibdsim2 simulates identity-by-descent sharing along chromosomes for arbitrary pedigrees, in both autosomal and X-chromosomal form, with downstream tools for segment statistics, pattern finding and distribution plots. Since 2.1.0 the Shiny front end lives inside the package and launches via launchApp() rather than sitting in a separate repository. The latest release is performance work, with profileSimIBD() substantially sped up for dense marker panels and ibdsim() skipping recombination in pedigree branches that cannot affect the result.

Read the full ibdsim2 trajectory →

glyvis vs ibdsim2: editorial side-by-side

G
glyvis
ANALYTICS
0.0

glyvis keeps losing plot functions as the packages behind them get reorganized.

◆ Current state

glyvis is the plotting layer for glycoverse results. Its recent releases are dominated by two forces it does not control: glyexp's container migration, which it absorbed in 0.7.0 by accepting SummarizedExperiment inputs, and glystats' function removals, which cost it first the WGCNA and consensus-clustering autoplot methods and then the entire enrichment plotting surface. Its own additions in the window are narrow, mostly label handling and NA robustness.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is being pruned from upstream rather than expanded from within. Every breaking change in the last four releases is a removal triggered by a sibling package dropping the function that produced the object being plotted. With enrichment now living in glyfun, the plotting for it has to be rebuilt somewhere, and glyvis is the obvious home.

◆ Prediction

Expect enrichment plotting to return once glyfun's result objects stabilize, since the visualizations were removed for want of an upstream producer rather than because users stopped needing them.

I
ibdsim2
ANALYTICS
2.5

A pedigree IBD simulator that absorbed its own web app and now optimises for dense marker panels.

◆ Current state

ibdsim2 simulates identity-by-descent sharing along chromosomes for arbitrary pedigrees, in both autosomal and X-chromosomal form, with downstream tools for segment statistics, pattern finding and distribution plots. Since 2.1.0 the Shiny front end lives inside the package and launches via launchApp() rather than sitting in a separate repository. The latest release is performance work, with profileSimIBD() substantially sped up for dense marker panels and ibdsim() skipping recombination in pedigree branches that cannot affect the result.

◆ Where it's heading

Two long-running threads. One is the app as a first-class part of the package, which has been getting input validation, dependency checks and plotting fixes release after release, treating a research GUI as software to be maintained rather than a demo. The other is numerical care: the built-in recombination map was rebuilt in 2.3.0 with better chromosome endpoints and a thinning algorithm that cut it from about 38,000 points to 14,000 without losing accuracy, and IBD segment merging has been made consistent across the realised-coefficient functions. The maintainer flags repeatedly that seeded results may differ across versions, which is the right disclosure for a simulator used in published analyses.

◆ Prediction

The recent work points at further speed on dense panels and continued hardening of app input handling, both of which have appeared in each of the last several releases. Nothing here signals a new modelling capability on the way.

Alternatives to glyvis and ibdsim2

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either glyvis or ibdsim2.

See all glyvis alternatives → · See all ibdsim2 alternatives →

Recent activity from glyvis and ibdsim2

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 11d agoibdsim2profileSimIBD() sped up for dense marker panels; segment merging fixed
  2. 1mo agoglyvisDocs recommend the new SE containers
  3. 1mo agoglyvisplot_logo() detects glycoproteomics across both containers
  4. 1mo agoglyvisPlots accept SummarizedExperiment; enrichment plots removed
  5. 3mo agoglyvisStale WGCNA and clustering autoplot methods removed
  6. 6mo agoglyvisDependencies move to the r-universe repository
  7. 7mo agoglyvisplot_logo() fetches UniProt sequences automatically
  8. 8mo agoibdsim2Segment-distribution merge argument, and function-valued parameters
  9. 1y agoibdsim2Built-in decode19 recombination map rebuilt, cutting 38k points to 14k
  10. 1y agoibdsim2Consistent IBD segment merging across the realised-coefficient functions
  11. 1y agoibdsim2Built-in pedigree labels revised; extra inbred examples added
  12. 1y agoibdsim2The Shiny front end moves into the package and gains X-chromosomal simulation

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between glyvis and ibdsim2?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. ibdsim2 is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is glyvis better than ibdsim2?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ibdsim2 is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to glyvis?

Top glyvis alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "glyvis alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/glyvis for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to ibdsim2?

Top ibdsim2 alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ibdsim2 alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ibdsim2 for the full list with editorial commentary on each.