← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

glyanno vs silx

A side-by-side editorial comparison of glyanno and silx — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

glyanno vs silx: at a glance

Featureglyannosilx
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score3.85.0
Sparks · 30d10
Top themesglycomics, mass-spectrometry, structure-annotation, databasesscientific-computing, data-visualization, synchrotron, qt
Last editorial update2d ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is glyanno?

Glycan annotation stops depending on the database having seen the structure before.

glyanno resolves mass spectrometry observations into glycan compositions and structures, converting between m/z, composition and structure, filling in missing detail on partial structures, and mapping results to GlyTouCan accessions. The newest release adds de novo reconstruction of topological N-glycans, falling back to the topological database only when reconstruction is not possible. Batch performance was reworked at the same time, with vector inputs reusing prepared databases and direct lookups instead of repeating setup per element.

Read the full glyanno trajectory →

What is silx?

silx settles into maintenance a release after its PySide6 migration

silx is in the quiet phase after a generational release. 3.1.1 is a single fix to FitWidget loading a fit function from file. The release before it, 3.1.0, was the first real feature work since the migration - asinh axis scaling, twilight colormaps, and dark-theme icons - and 3.0.1 was similarly small. The 3.0.0 cut that reset the Qt binding and Python floor still defines what the line is doing.

Read the full silx trajectory →

glyanno vs silx: editorial side-by-side

G
glyanno
ANALYTICS
3.8

Glycan annotation stops depending on the database having seen the structure before.

◆ Current state

glyanno resolves mass spectrometry observations into glycan compositions and structures, converting between m/z, composition and structure, filling in missing detail on partial structures, and mapping results to GlyTouCan accessions. The newest release adds de novo reconstruction of topological N-glycans, falling back to the topological database only when reconstruction is not possible. Batch performance was reworked at the same time, with vector inputs reusing prepared databases and direct lookups instead of repeating setup per element.

◆ Where it's heading

The consistent theme is making ambiguous results honest and predictable. return_best moved from returning a shortened tibble to a vector aligned with the input, with NA for unmatched glycans; matching concrete compositions against a generic database now errors instead of silently returning nothing; zero-length database arguments are rejected. Alongside that, functions belonging elsewhere have been pushed down into glyrepr rather than duplicated, which is the same boundary discipline visible across this cohort. Version churn is largely driven by upstream: two of the last six entries exist to absorb breaking changes in glyrepr.

◆ Prediction

De novo reconstruction currently covers topological N-glycans only, so extending it to other structure levels or to O-glycans is the natural next step. The performance work suggests batch annotation of full experiments is now the primary use being optimised for.

S
silx
ANALYTICS
5.0

silx settles into maintenance a release after its PySide6 migration

◆ Current state

silx is in the quiet phase after a generational release. 3.1.1 is a single fix to FitWidget loading a fit function from file. The release before it, 3.1.0, was the first real feature work since the migration - asinh axis scaling, twilight colormaps, and dark-theme icons - and 3.0.1 was similarly small. The 3.0.0 cut that reset the Qt binding and Python floor still defines what the line is doing.

◆ Where it's heading

The cadence has slowed markedly since April, and the content has shifted from structural change to plotting and colormap refinement. That is the expected shape after a binding migration: downstream beamline code needs a stable target, so the project trades feature velocity for a quiet surface. The gap between 3.0.1 in May and 3.1.0 in August is the clearest signal of the deliberate slowdown.

◆ Prediction

Expect further point releases servicing the plotting and fitting widgets rather than another structural change, with feature work continuing to arrive in the 3.1.x minors rather than patches.

Alternatives to glyanno and silx

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either glyanno or silx.

See all glyanno alternatives → · See all silx alternatives →

Recent activity from glyanno and silx

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 4h agosilxFitWidget fix for loading a fit function from file
  2. 9d agosilx3.1.0: asinh axis scaling, twilight colormaps, dark-theme icons
  3. 27d agoglyannoDe novo reconstruction of topological N-glycans, with database fallback
  4. 3mo agosilx3.0.1: silx view fails to disable HDF5 file locking
  5. 3mo agoglyannoGlyTouCan accession mapping and anomeric position filling
  6. 3mo agoglyannoFixes an enhance_struc() break from glyrepr 0.11.0
  7. 3mo agosilx3.0.0: PySide6 becomes the default Qt binding, Python 3.10 required
  8. 3mo agosilx3.0.0rc1: release candidate for the PySide6 migration
  9. 4mo agoglyannoExplicit empty return from com_to_struc()
  10. 4mo agoglyannoreturn_best output aligns with input length; silent empty matches now error
  11. 5mo agoglyannoto_level parameter removed from enhance_struc()
  12. 1y agosilx2.2.2: plot axes limits, OpenGL axes and libhdf5 1.14 fixes

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between glyanno and silx?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. silx is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 3.8), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 1. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is glyanno better than silx?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. silx is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 3.8), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 1. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to glyanno?

Top glyanno alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "glyanno alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/glyanno for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to silx?

Top silx alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "silx alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/silx for the full list with editorial commentary on each.