tibblify
tibblify learned to derive its own specs from OpenAPI, removing the step users disliked most
Comparison · Analytics
glyanno vs glystats
A side-by-side editorial comparison of glyanno and glystats — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:glycomics
glyanno vs glystats: at a glance
What is glyanno?
Glycan annotation stops depending on the database having seen the structure before.
glyanno resolves mass spectrometry observations into glycan compositions and structures, converting between m/z, composition and structure, filling in missing detail on partial structures, and mapping results to GlyTouCan accessions. The newest release adds de novo reconstruction of topological N-glycans, falling back to the topological database only when reconstruction is not possible. Batch performance was reworked at the same time, with vector inputs reusing prepared databases and direct lookups instead of repeating setup per element.
What is glystats?
glystats keeps deleting analyses it decided belong somewhere else.
glystats provides the statistical tests behind glycoverse: differential analysis, clustering, dimensionality reduction, and until recently enrichment. The last four releases are mostly subtraction. WGCNA and consensus clustering were removed in 0.10.0 as too interactive for a pipeline package, the enrichment functions were deprecated in the same release and deleted in 0.11.0 in favor of glyfun, and 0.11.0 also removed every gly_*_() matrix and vector interface. What remains accepts SummarizedExperiment inputs.
glyanno vs glystats: editorial side-by-side
glyanno
3.8ANALYTICS
Glycan annotation stops depending on the database having seen the structure before.
◆ Current state
glyanno resolves mass spectrometry observations into glycan compositions and structures, converting between m/z, composition and structure, filling in missing detail on partial structures, and mapping results to GlyTouCan accessions. The newest release adds de novo reconstruction of topological N-glycans, falling back to the topological database only when reconstruction is not possible. Batch performance was reworked at the same time, with vector inputs reusing prepared databases and direct lookups instead of repeating setup per element.
◆ Where it's heading
The consistent theme is making ambiguous results honest and predictable. return_best moved from returning a shortened tibble to a vector aligned with the input, with NA for unmatched glycans; matching concrete compositions against a generic database now errors instead of silently returning nothing; zero-length database arguments are rejected. Alongside that, functions belonging elsewhere have been pushed down into glyrepr rather than duplicated, which is the same boundary discipline visible across this cohort. Version churn is largely driven by upstream: two of the last six entries exist to absorb breaking changes in glyrepr.
◆ Prediction
De novo reconstruction currently covers topological N-glycans only, so extending it to other structure levels or to O-glycans is the natural next step. The performance work suggests batch annotation of full experiments is now the primary use being optimised for.
glystats
0.0ANALYTICS
glystats keeps deleting analyses it decided belong somewhere else.
◆ Current state
glystats provides the statistical tests behind glycoverse: differential analysis, clustering, dimensionality reduction, and until recently enrichment. The last four releases are mostly subtraction. WGCNA and consensus clustering were removed in 0.10.0 as too interactive for a pipeline package, the enrichment functions were deprecated in the same release and deleted in 0.11.0 in favor of glyfun, and 0.11.0 also removed every gly_*_() matrix and vector interface. What remains accepts SummarizedExperiment inputs.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is narrowing on purpose. The through-line across removals is a refusal to support two calling conventions or two homes for the same analysis: containers only, no bare matrices; one enrichment implementation, in glyfun. The additive work in the window went to statistical rigor rather than surface area, with effect sizes added to the four main tests, sign bugs fixed, and the log2 pseudo-count reduced.
◆ Prediction
With the interface pruning finished, the next releases are more likely to deepen the tests that remain than to add new analysis families.
Alternatives to glyanno and glystats
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either glyanno or glystats.
spsurvey
spsurvey has spent four years consolidating after its 5.0.0 rewrite rather than adding to it
StreamCatTools
StreamCatTools is quietly moving off web services and onto cloud-native GeoParquet
reproducible
reproducible added a windowed read path so remote GeoTiffs never fully download
qcTAF
qcTAF is building an automated checklist for reproducible fisheries assessments, one criterion at a time
rpymat
After three dormant years, rpymat returned to fix the OpenMP crash that breaks R and conda together
See all glyanno alternatives → · See all glystats alternatives →
Recent activity from glyanno and glystats
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 24d agoglyannoDe novo reconstruction of topological N-glycans, with database fallback ⚡
- 1mo agoglystatsDocs recommend the new SE containers
- 1mo agoglystatsTests recognize both container types consistently
- 1mo agoglystatsMatrix interfaces and enrichment functions removed
- 2mo agoglystatsSmaller log2 pseudo-count across DEA and clustering
- 3mo agoglyannoGlyTouCan accession mapping and anomeric position filling
- 3mo agoglyannoFixes an enhance_struc() break from glyrepr 0.11.0
- 3mo agoglystatsWGCNA and clustering dropped, enrichment deprecated
- 4mo agoglystatsEffect sizes added and test statistic signs fixed
- 4mo agoglyannoExplicit empty return from com_to_struc()
- 4mo agoglyannoreturn_best output aligns with input length; silent empty matches now error
- 5mo agoglyannoto_level parameter removed from enhance_struc()
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between glyanno and glystats?
Both compete on the same themes — glycomics — within Analytics. glyanno is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 3.8 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is glyanno better than glystats?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. glyanno is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 3.8 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to glyanno?
Top glyanno alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "glyanno alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/glyanno for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to glystats?
Top glystats alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "glystats alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/glystats for the full list with editorial commentary on each.