tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
giscoR vs r2rtf
A side-by-side editorial comparison of giscoR and r2rtf — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
giscoR vs r2rtf: at a glance
What is giscoR?
giscoR's 1.0 moved its dataset index into the cache, so new Eurostat releases arrive without a package update.
giscoR downloads Eurostat GISCO administrative and statistical geodata — countries, NUTS regions, LAUs, urban audit units — as sf objects. The 1.0.0 release in December 2025 rebuilt the package on httr2, preferred GeoPackage downloads, reorganised the cache into topic folders, and moved the dataset database itself into the cache so it can be refreshed independently. Releases since have been a cache-persistence fix, a configurable timeout and an internals refactor.
What is r2rtf?
The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely
r2rtf builds the RTF tables, listings and figures that go into clinical study reports, and its recent releases have been about widening who and what it can serve rather than changing how tables are composed. The 1.2.0 release added internationalization — a SimSun font path for Chinese characters plus hyphenation control — and 1.3.0 followed with write_docx() and write_html(), turning the LibreOffice conversion the package had documented into exported functions.
giscoR vs r2rtf: editorial side-by-side
giscoR
0.0ANALYTICS
giscoR's 1.0 moved its dataset index into the cache, so new Eurostat releases arrive without a package update.
◆ Current state
giscoR downloads Eurostat GISCO administrative and statistical geodata — countries, NUTS regions, LAUs, urban audit units — as sf objects. The 1.0.0 release in December 2025 rebuilt the package on httr2, preferred GeoPackage downloads, reorganised the cache into topic folders, and moved the dataset database itself into the cache so it can be refreshed independently. Releases since have been a cache-persistence fix, a configurable timeout and an internals refactor.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is decoupling itself from Eurostat's publication calendar. Historically each new GISCO vintage required a release that bumped default years and rebuilt an internal dataset; after 1.0.0 a user can call gisco_get_cached_db(update_cache = TRUE) and reach new data without waiting. The follow-up releases are consistent with a project in consolidation — fixing the cache it just introduced, exposing a timeout for slow downloads, and tidying internals.
◆ Prediction
With the database now self-updating, expect releases to shift toward download reliability and new GISCO endpoints rather than annual dataset bumps; the timeout option in 1.1.0 suggests large downloads are the current pain point.
r2rtf
0.0ANALYTICS
The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely
◆ Current state
r2rtf builds the RTF tables, listings and figures that go into clinical study reports, and its recent releases have been about widening who and what it can serve rather than changing how tables are composed. The 1.2.0 release added internationalization — a SimSun font path for Chinese characters plus hyphenation control — and 1.3.0 followed with write_docx() and write_html(), turning the LibreOffice conversion the package had documented into exported functions.
◆ Where it's heading
Two threads run through the window. One is output reach: RTF remains the composition target, but the artifacts that come out of it now include DOCX and HTML, and page numbering can be made table-relative across multi-page tables. The other is durability under a moving R and font stack — the ANSI/Unicode converter was rebuilt, the LaTeX mapping table generated from code rather than shipped as sysdata, unlist() usage fixed for R 4.5, and graphics-device leaks that produced stray Rplots.pdf closed off.
◆ Prediction
Having exported DOCX and HTML conversion, the likely next step is filling in what those formats lose relative to RTF — pagination and footnote fidelity are the obvious gaps. The i18n path currently covers Chinese only, so additional font families are the other plausible direction.
Alternatives to giscoR and r2rtf
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either giscoR or r2rtf.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all giscoR alternatives → · See all r2rtf alternatives →
Recent activity from giscoR and r2rtf
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agogiscoRInternal refactor with faster mocked tests
- 4mo agogiscoRDownload timeout becomes configurable
- 6mo agogiscoRCache persistence fixed; urban audit defaults to 2024
- 7mo agor2rtfDOCX and HTML output become exported functions
- 7mo agogiscoR1.0 caches the dataset index so new vintages need no release ⚡
- 11mo agor2rtfChinese character support arrives via an i18n font path ⚡
- 1y agor2rtfText colour fixed for figures encoded into RTF
- 1y agor2rtfFootnote handling fixed for R 4.5.0
- 1y agor2rtfUnicode converter rebuilt and mapping table made inspectable
- 1y agogiscoRSource filtering fixed in gisco_get_lau()
- 1y agogiscoR2024 datasets and year arguments for education and healthcare
- 2y agor2rtfUTF-8 conversion fix and LibreOffice 7.6 support
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between giscoR and r2rtf?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. giscoR and r2rtf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is giscoR better than r2rtf?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. giscoR and r2rtf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to giscoR?
Top giscoR alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "giscoR alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/giscor for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to r2rtf?
Top r2rtf alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "r2rtf alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/r2rtf for the full list with editorial commentary on each.