tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
ggsurvfit vs webmockr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of ggsurvfit and webmockr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
ggsurvfit vs webmockr: at a glance
What is ggsurvfit?
ggsurvfit is in correctness-and-compatibility mode, not feature mode.
The package draws survival and cumulative-incidence curves on a ggplot2 grammar, with risk tables, p-values and quantile annotations. Recent releases are entirely fixes and upstream tracking: ggplot2 v4.0.0 compatibility in 2025, and a 2026 patch correcting a Gray-test p-value that could be reported for the wrong competing event.
What is webmockr?
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
ggsurvfit vs webmockr: editorial side-by-side
ggsurvfit
2.5ANALYTICS
ggsurvfit is in correctness-and-compatibility mode, not feature mode.
◆ Current state
The package draws survival and cumulative-incidence curves on a ggplot2 grammar, with risk tables, p-values and quantile annotations. Recent releases are entirely fixes and upstream tracking: ggplot2 v4.0.0 compatibility in 2025, and a 2026 patch correcting a Gray-test p-value that could be reported for the wrong competing event.
◆ Where it's heading
The feature surface settled around 1.0.0, when risk-table alignment was exported and colour and linetype defaults became configurable. Since then the work is keeping pace with survival, ggplot2 and tidycmprsk changes, and closing cases where the plotted curve and the annotation disagreed — the p-value matched by position rather than name, confidence limits swapped for multi-state models, quantiles read off a plateau.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next release to track upstream survival or ggplot2 changes rather than add plotting features; the CDISC censoring convention adopted in Surv_CNSR() suggests further alignment with clinical data standards is the likelier direction.
webmockr
0.0ANALYTICS
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
◆ Current state
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
◆ Where it's heading
Two arcs run in sequence. The first is coverage — multiple queued responses in 0.7.0, basic auth mocking, async through crul, then httr2 — building out what can be stubbed. The second, starting with 2.0.0, is correctness and independence: stubs are now deleted if an error occurs mid-construction rather than lingering half-built, partial matching arrives for bodies and queries, and the dependency graph is pruned release by release. The 2.2.0 split from vcr landed within a minute of crul's release taking mocking control into its own clients.
◆ Prediction
RequestPattern is documented as still exported in 2.1.0 but slated for removal, so the next major release is where that lands. Expect continued dependency pruning rather than new client support — the three clients that exist are already covered.
Alternatives to ggsurvfit and webmockr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ggsurvfit or webmockr.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all ggsurvfit alternatives → · See all webmockr alternatives →
Recent activity from ggsurvfit and webmockr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 21d agoggsurvfitGray-test p-values matched to the plotted outcome by name
- 10mo agoggsurvfitggplot2 v4.0.0 compatibility and multi-state CI label fix
- 1y agowebmockrvcr dependency severed
- 1y agowebmockrInternal classes unexported; crul becomes an optional dependency
- 1y agowebmockrFailed stub construction cleans up; partial matching extends to bodies and queries
- 2y agowebmockrhttr2 joins httr and crul as a supported client ⚡
- 2y agoggsurvfitNegative follow-up times and a cloglog transformation
- 2y agoggsurvfitAesthetic defaults become switchable and alignment is exported
- 2y agoggsurvfitConfidence limits corrected for monotonicity-reversing transforms
- 3y agoggsurvfitGlue syntax in risk tables and coxph model support
- 3y agowebmockrQueued responses, body matching and integer status codes fixed
- 3y agowebmockrRegex URI matching fixed
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between ggsurvfit and webmockr?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. ggsurvfit is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is ggsurvfit better than webmockr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ggsurvfit is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to ggsurvfit?
Top ggsurvfit alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ggsurvfit alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ggsurvfit for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to webmockr?
Top webmockr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webmockr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webmockr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.