mlr3proba
mlr3proba is shedding weight as its survival work moves into sibling packages
A side-by-side editorial comparison of ggspatial and workflowsets — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
ggspatial finishes its move off raster and onto terra
ggspatial puts spatial data into ggplot2. Its recent history is a single multi-year migration: terra support arrived alongside raster in 1.1.6, and by 1.1.10 terra is the default in the bundled data loaders while raster is described as deprecated. Everything between those two releases is ggplot2 compatibility patching.
workflowsets keeps widening what counts as a model worth comparing.
workflowsets holds a grid of preprocessor and model combinations and evaluates all of them under one call to workflow_map(). The releases in view widen that grid — clustering specifications via tidyclust, censored regression via an eval_time argument, case weights — and fill in the accessors around it with collect_notes(), collect_extracts() and fit_best(). The long-running pull_*() deprecation finally reached the error stage in 1.1.1.
ggspatial puts spatial data into ggplot2. Its recent history is a single multi-year migration: terra support arrived alongside raster in 1.1.6, and by 1.1.10 terra is the default in the bundled data loaders while raster is described as deprecated. Everything between those two releases is ggplot2 compatibility patching.
The package tracks the R spatial stack's own generational shift rather than setting direction itself — sf and stars support, then terra, then preparing S3 methods for the next ggplot2. Feature work is rare; the value it delivers is staying current with the layers underneath it.
The likely next step is completing the ggplot2 S3 method preparation that 1.1.10 started, with raster support eventually dropped rather than maintained in parallel.
workflowsets holds a grid of preprocessor and model combinations and evaluates all of them under one call to workflow_map(). The releases in view widen that grid — clustering specifications via tidyclust, censored regression via an eval_time argument, case weights — and fill in the accessors around it with collect_notes(), collect_extracts() and fit_best(). The long-running pull_*() deprecation finally reached the error stage in 1.1.1.
The package's job is comparison, so its direction is set by what tidymodels can express: every time a new model paradigm lands elsewhere, workflowsets has to learn to rank it. Clustering was the largest of those steps because it has no outcome column to score against. Alongside that runs a slower cleanup — named-only optional arguments, type checking on inputs, informative errors when someone passes a workflow set to fit() — that reads as a package hardening after its API settled.
Expect the tailor postprocessors that workflows added in 1.3.0 to need representation here next, since a workflow set that cannot vary the postprocessor cannot compare calibration choices.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ggspatial or workflowsets.
mlr3proba is shedding weight as its survival work moves into sibling packages
mlr3viz keeps the ecosystem's plots working while the plots themselves move out
mlr3tuning is rebuilding its async machinery under a stable public surface
timetk swallowed anomalize whole, then went quiet for two years
modelbased is turning marginal effects into a full contrast grammar
easystats' parameters package absorbs one more model class every few weeks
See all ggspatial alternatives → · See all workflowsets alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. ggspatial and workflowsets are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ggspatial and workflowsets are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top ggspatial alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ggspatial alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ggspatial for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top workflowsets alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "workflowsets alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/workflowsets for the full list with editorial commentary on each.