← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

ggquiver vs ibis.iSDM

A side-by-side editorial comparison of ggquiver and ibis.iSDM — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

ggquiver vs ibis.iSDM: at a glance

Featureggquiveribis.iSDM
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesggplot2 extension, vector fields, data visualization, coordinate systemsr-package, species-distribution-models, terra, spatial
Last editorial update4h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is ggquiver?

ggquiver returned after four years to make arrows respect ggplot's own scales.

A small ggplot2 extension for quiver and vector-field plots. The 0.3.x line in late 2021 was about making arrows behave correctly outside plain Cartesian coordinates — non-Cartesian coordinate systems, ggmap backgrounds, arrow sizing and angles. Then nothing for over four years, until 0.4.0 made arrows honour scale transformations on the x and y aesthetics and exposed grid::arrow()'s appearance options.

Read the full ggquiver trajectory →

What is ibis.iSDM?

A raster-to-terra migration is the only readable change in a feed of merge notes.

ibis.iSDM fits integrated species distribution models in R. Its release notes are GitHub's auto-generated pull-request lists, so most tags say only which branch was merged and by whom. The one release with a written note, 0.0.5, records the migration from raster to terra across the whole package, with an explicit warning that established code may break.

Read the full ibis.iSDM trajectory →

ggquiver vs ibis.iSDM: editorial side-by-side

G
ggquiver
ANALYTICS
0.0

ggquiver returned after four years to make arrows respect ggplot's own scales.

◆ Current state

A small ggplot2 extension for quiver and vector-field plots. The 0.3.x line in late 2021 was about making arrows behave correctly outside plain Cartesian coordinates — non-Cartesian coordinate systems, ggmap backgrounds, arrow sizing and angles. Then nothing for over four years, until 0.4.0 made arrows honour scale transformations on the x and y aesthetics and exposed grid::arrow()'s appearance options.

◆ Where it's heading

The consistent theme across both eras is deferring to ggplot2 rather than drawing on top of it: coordinate systems first, then scale transformations, then arrow styling handed to grid. Development is episodic — years pass, then a release that closes the gap between what the geom does and what a user expects from any other layer. The changelog is entirely correctness and integration work; there is no sign of the package growing new plot types.

◆ Prediction

The entries only support a narrow read: further releases will likely keep closing ggplot2 integration gaps as they are reported, but the four-year gap means cadence is not predictable from this feed.

I
ibis.iSDM
ANALYTICS
0.0

A raster-to-terra migration is the only readable change in a feed of merge notes.

◆ Current state

ibis.iSDM fits integrated species distribution models in R. Its release notes are GitHub's auto-generated pull-request lists, so most tags say only which branch was merged and by whom. The one release with a written note, 0.0.5, records the migration from raster to terra across the whole package, with an explicit warning that established code may break.

◆ Where it's heading

Direction cannot be read from this feed with any confidence - three of the four visible tags carry nothing beyond merge titles and a full-changelog link. What is visible is a 2023 spent on dependency modernisation and dev-branch merges, ending with a 0.1.1 tag that December and nothing since.

◆ Prediction

These entries do not support a prediction; the notes would have to carry written content before a direction could be read from them.

Alternatives to ggquiver and ibis.iSDM

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ggquiver or ibis.iSDM.

See all ggquiver alternatives → · See all ibis.iSDM alternatives →

Recent activity from ggquiver and ibis.iSDM

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 6mo agoggquiverArrows respect scale transformations and grid arrow styling
  2. 2y agoibis.iSDMVersion 0.1.1
  3. 3y agoibis.iSDMVersion 0.0.7
  4. 3y agoibis.iSDMVersion 0.0.6
  5. 3y agoibis.iSDMraster replaced by terra across the package
  6. 4y agoggquiverArrow scaling and centered-arrow angle fixes
  7. 4y agoggquiverFix for resized vectors via vecsize
  8. 4y agoggquiverNon-Cartesian coordinates and ggmap backgrounds supported

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between ggquiver and ibis.iSDM?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. ggquiver and ibis.iSDM are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is ggquiver better than ibis.iSDM?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ggquiver and ibis.iSDM are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to ggquiver?

Top ggquiver alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ggquiver alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ggquiver for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to ibis.iSDM?

Top ibis.iSDM alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ibis.iSDM alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ibis-isdm for the full list with editorial commentary on each.