← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

ggmagnify vs tmap

A side-by-side editorial comparison of ggmagnify and tmap — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

ggmagnify vs tmap: at a glance

Featureggmagnifytmap
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesggplot2, data-visualization, inset-plots, r-packagethematic-mapping, spatial-data, ggplot-alternative, extensibility
Last editorial update1h ago8h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is ggmagnify?

A single-purpose ggplot2 inset tool, refining the same three arguments.

ggmagnify draws magnified insets of a region of a ggplot, with projection lines connecting the inset to its source area. The visible releases are all small refinements to how that inset looks — corner radius, fill between projection lines — plus one fix for inset themes being overridden. There are only three entries, so the picture is necessarily partial.

Read the full ggmagnify trajectory →

What is tmap?

Two years after a from-scratch rewrite, tmap is filling in the layers v4 promised.

tmap draws thematic maps in R across static and interactive modes. The 4.0 rewrite replaced the layer syntax with explicit visual variables, scales, legends and charts, and opened the package to extensions; the 4.x line since has been steady capability fill-in. The 4.4 release adds tm_circles with fixed unit-based radii, a blend argument on every layer, and hitboxes so small objects stay clickable in view mode.

Read the full tmap trajectory →

ggmagnify vs tmap: editorial side-by-side

G
ggmagnify
ANALYTICS
0.0

A single-purpose ggplot2 inset tool, refining the same three arguments.

◆ Current state

ggmagnify draws magnified insets of a region of a ggplot, with projection lines connecting the inset to its source area. The visible releases are all small refinements to how that inset looks — corner radius, fill between projection lines — plus one fix for inset themes being overridden. There are only three entries, so the picture is necessarily partial.

◆ Where it's heading

Work concentrates on the visual finish of the inset rather than on new capability, which is what a package with one job should look like. Two feature releases a week apart in early 2024 suggest a short burst of attention rather than sustained development, and the feed goes quiet after mid-2024.

◆ Prediction

Too few entries to call a direction with confidence; continued small styling arguments would be consistent with what is visible.

T
tmap
ANALYTICS
0.0

Two years after a from-scratch rewrite, tmap is filling in the layers v4 promised.

◆ Current state

tmap draws thematic maps in R across static and interactive modes. The 4.0 rewrite replaced the layer syntax with explicit visual variables, scales, legends and charts, and opened the package to extensions; the 4.x line since has been steady capability fill-in. The 4.4 release adds tm_circles with fixed unit-based radii, a blend argument on every layer, and hitboxes so small objects stay clickable in view mode.

◆ Where it's heading

The extension mechanism introduced in 4.0 is where the interesting work is migrating: PMTiles support arrived through a separate experimental tmap.sources package, mode cycling became configurable via tmap_mode_pool() so packages like tmap.mapgl can register themselves, and shiny dispatch methods were added specifically to let other modes integrate. The core package is increasingly a rendering contract that satellite packages plug into.

◆ Prediction

Expect more rendering backends to land as sibling packages rather than in tmap itself, with the core continuing to absorb the dispatch and mode-management plumbing they need.

Alternatives to ggmagnify and tmap

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ggmagnify or tmap.

See all ggmagnify alternatives → · See all tmap alternatives →

Recent activity from ggmagnify and tmap

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agotmapDocumentation-only patch tidying man-page titles
  2. 1mo agotmaptm_circles, layer blending and clickable small objects
  3. 1y agotmaptmap v4 rewritten from scratch with a new layer syntax
  4. 1y agotmapFinal 3.x release before the v4 rewrite
  5. 2y agoggmagnifyFixes inset theme override on supplied plots
  6. 2y agoggmagnifyAdds fill between projection lines
  7. 2y agoggmagnifyAdds corner radius for target and inset

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between ggmagnify and tmap?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. ggmagnify and tmap are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is ggmagnify better than tmap?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ggmagnify and tmap are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to ggmagnify?

Top ggmagnify alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ggmagnify alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ggmagnify for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to tmap?

Top tmap alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tmap alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tmap-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.