← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

gghighlight vs soilDB

A side-by-side editorial comparison of gghighlight and soilDB — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

gghighlight vs soilDB: at a glance

FeaturegghighlightsoilDB
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesggplot2, data-visualisation, ggplot-extension, upstream-compatsoil-data, usda-nasis, ssurgo, spatial-queries
Last editorial update1h ago6h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is gghighlight?

A single-purpose ggplot2 extension that has spent six years tracking ggplot2 instead of growing.

gghighlight adds one verb to ggplot2: highlight the series matching a predicate and grey out the rest, with unhighlighted_params controlling how the shadowed layer renders and calculate_per_facet deciding whether the predicate evaluates within facets. The API settled at 0.2.0; the 0.5.0 release supports ggplot2 v4.0 including its ink and paper theme elements, and finally deletes gghighlight_point() and gghighlight_line().

Read the full gghighlight trajectory →

What is soilDB?

The R front door to USDA soil data finishes a long deprecation cleanup and turns local-first.

soilDB is the R access layer for USDA-NRCS soil data: NASIS local databases, Soil Data Access, SoilWeb coverage services, and a widening set of curated national grids. The 2.9.x line closed out a multi-release deprecation cycle — column aliases and stringsAsFactors are gone, R 4.1 is the floor, and the bundled sample profile collections were rebuilt against the new schema. Recent work has shifted from adding query functions to making existing ones faster and usable against local SQLite or GeoPackage copies.

Read the full soilDB trajectory →

gghighlight vs soilDB: editorial side-by-side

G
gghighlight
ANALYTICS
0.0

A single-purpose ggplot2 extension that has spent six years tracking ggplot2 instead of growing.

◆ Current state

gghighlight adds one verb to ggplot2: highlight the series matching a predicate and grey out the rest, with unhighlighted_params controlling how the shadowed layer renders and calculate_per_facet deciding whether the predicate evaluates within facets. The API settled at 0.2.0; the 0.5.0 release supports ggplot2 v4.0 including its ink and paper theme elements, and finally deletes gghighlight_point() and gghighlight_line().

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run through the history. One is a slow deprecation, from soft-deprecating the geom-specific functions at 0.1.0, to defunct at 0.3.0, to removed at 0.5.0 — a five-year removal cycle. The other is compatibility work: purrr 1.0.0, dplyr's across() deprecation, ggplot2 3.4.0, then 4.0. Genuine feature additions are rare and small, with line_label_type at 0.4.0 the last one. Note that 0.3.2's notes restate 0.3.1's n() item, so adjacent tags here overlap rather than each describing distinct work.

◆ Prediction

The next release most likely absorbs further ggplot2 4.x changes, given that is what triggered the last three. Nothing in the entries points to a new highlighting capability.

S
soilDB
ANALYTICS
0.0

The R front door to USDA soil data finishes a long deprecation cleanup and turns local-first.

◆ Current state

soilDB is the R access layer for USDA-NRCS soil data: NASIS local databases, Soil Data Access, SoilWeb coverage services, and a widening set of curated national grids. The 2.9.x line closed out a multi-release deprecation cycle — column aliases and stringsAsFactors are gone, R 4.1 is the floor, and the bundled sample profile collections were rebuilt against the new schema. Recent work has shifted from adding query functions to making existing ones faster and usable against local SQLite or GeoPackage copies.

◆ Where it's heading

The arc points at offline and local-first workflows. downloadSSURGO() and createSSURGO() keep gaining arguments for building and querying local SSURGO databases, and the query internals were rewritten as common table expressions so identical code runs against the remote service or a local file. Coverage is widening in parallel: FY26 SoilWeb maps now reach most OCONUS surveys, while fetchHWSD() and fetchSOLUS() pull in datasets outside the core NASIS/SSURGO pair. Federal URL churn — EDIT, SoilWeb, S3-hosted geometry — is a recurring maintenance tax the package absorbs on users' behalf.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next releases to keep extending parallel and offline SSURGO handling, since LAPPLY.FUN has just opened the door to arbitrary parallel backends, and to fold more curated SoilWeb and FAO datasets behind fetch* wrappers.

Alternatives to gghighlight and soilDB

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either gghighlight or soilDB.

See all gghighlight alternatives → · See all soilDB alternatives →

Recent activity from gghighlight and soilDB

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agosoilDBFY26 soil maps reach OCONUS; SSURGO downloads go parallel
  2. 4mo agosoilDBROSETTA v2 lands as the deprecated NASIS aliases are removed
  3. 10mo agosoilDBNASIS record IDs now retrievable through Soil Data Access
  4. 11mo agosoilDBSpatial queries can pull columns from non-spatial tables
  5. 1y agosoilDBNASIS 7.4.3 metadata, plus HWSD and a local cache in 2.8.10
  6. 1y agogghighlightggplot2 v4.0 support; geom-specific functions removed
  7. 1y agosoilDBQuery internals rewritten as CTEs for local SQLite support
  8. 2y agogghighlightTest expectations updated for upcoming ggplot2
  9. 3y agogghighlightline_label_type adds geomtextpath and second-axis labelling
  10. 4y agogghighlightDeprecated dplyr::across() usage removed
  11. 5y agogghighlightExplicit NULL in unhighlighted_params preserved; aesthetic name clash fixed
  12. 5y agogghighlightDiscrete-scale labels and n() predicates

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between gghighlight and soilDB?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. gghighlight and soilDB are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is gghighlight better than soilDB?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. gghighlight and soilDB are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to gghighlight?

Top gghighlight alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "gghighlight alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/gghighlight for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to soilDB?

Top soilDB alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "soilDB alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/soildb for the full list with editorial commentary on each.