← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

gghighlight vs robma

A side-by-side editorial comparison of gghighlight and robma — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

gghighlight vs robma: at a glance

Featuregghighlightrobma
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesggplot2, data-visualisation, ggplot-extension, upstream-compatr-package, meta-analysis, bayesian, api-redesign
Last editorial update50m ago4h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is gghighlight?

A single-purpose ggplot2 extension that has spent six years tracking ggplot2 instead of growing.

gghighlight adds one verb to ggplot2: highlight the series matching a predicate and grey out the rest, with unhighlighted_params controlling how the shadowed layer renders and calculate_per_facet deciding whether the predicate evaluates within facets. The API settled at 0.2.0; the 0.5.0 release supports ggplot2 v4.0 including its ink and paper theme elements, and finally deletes gghighlight_point() and gghighlight_line().

Read the full gghighlight trajectory →

What is robma?

RoBMA 4.0 tears out its own constructor surface and rebuilds on one class hierarchy

RoBMA fits robust Bayesian model-averaged meta-analyses that adjust for publication bias. The 3.x line grew by accretion: separate constructors for each model family (RoBMA.reg, NoBMA, BiBMA and their .reg variants), a spike-and-slab algorithm in 3.3.0 that made estimation fast enough to matter, then a steady stream of post-estimation tooling gated on that algorithm — heterogeneity summaries, residuals, funnel plots, z-curve conversion, predict, extract, pooled and adjusted effects. Version 4.0.0 in May 2026 collapses all of it into a unified brma class hierarchy.

Read the full robma trajectory →

gghighlight vs robma: editorial side-by-side

G
gghighlight
ANALYTICS
0.0

A single-purpose ggplot2 extension that has spent six years tracking ggplot2 instead of growing.

◆ Current state

gghighlight adds one verb to ggplot2: highlight the series matching a predicate and grey out the rest, with unhighlighted_params controlling how the shadowed layer renders and calculate_per_facet deciding whether the predicate evaluates within facets. The API settled at 0.2.0; the 0.5.0 release supports ggplot2 v4.0 including its ink and paper theme elements, and finally deletes gghighlight_point() and gghighlight_line().

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run through the history. One is a slow deprecation, from soft-deprecating the geom-specific functions at 0.1.0, to defunct at 0.3.0, to removed at 0.5.0 — a five-year removal cycle. The other is compatibility work: purrr 1.0.0, dplyr's across() deprecation, ggplot2 3.4.0, then 4.0. Genuine feature additions are rare and small, with line_label_type at 0.4.0 the last one. Note that 0.3.2's notes restate 0.3.1's n() item, so adjacent tags here overlap rather than each describing distinct work.

◆ Prediction

The next release most likely absorbs further ggplot2 4.x changes, given that is what triggered the last three. Nothing in the entries points to a new highlighting capability.

R
robma
ANALYTICS
0.0

RoBMA 4.0 tears out its own constructor surface and rebuilds on one class hierarchy

◆ Current state

RoBMA fits robust Bayesian model-averaged meta-analyses that adjust for publication bias. The 3.x line grew by accretion: separate constructors for each model family (RoBMA.reg, NoBMA, BiBMA and their .reg variants), a spike-and-slab algorithm in 3.3.0 that made estimation fast enough to matter, then a steady stream of post-estimation tooling gated on that algorithm — heterogeneity summaries, residuals, funnel plots, z-curve conversion, predict, extract, pooled and adjusted effects. Version 4.0.0 in May 2026 collapses all of it into a unified brma class hierarchy.

◆ Where it's heading

The 3.x series solved the modeling problem and left an interface problem behind: a caller had to know which of six constructors matched their data type, and argument names differed across them. 4.0.0 resolves that by making the model family a set of arguments rather than a function name, and by standardizing input naming on metafor-style conventions. It shipped one day after BayesTools 0.3.0, the author's own upstream infrastructure package, whose new standardization and prior-transformation machinery this rewrite depends on.

◆ Prediction

A rewrite this wide usually needs a follow-up, so expect 4.0.x patches addressing migration gaps as users hit the removed constructors and renamed arguments.

Alternatives to gghighlight and robma

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either gghighlight or robma.

See all gghighlight alternatives → · See all robma alternatives →

Recent activity from gghighlight and robma

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3mo agorobmaUnifies six model constructors into one brma class hierarchy
  2. 8mo agorobmaRoBMA 3.6.1
  3. 11mo agorobmaRoBMA 3.6.0
  4. 1y agorobmaRoBMA 3.5.1
  5. 1y agogghighlightggplot2 v4.0 support; geom-specific functions removed
  6. 1y agorobmaRoBMA 3.5.0
  7. 1y agorobmaRoBMA 3.4.0
  8. 2y agogghighlightTest expectations updated for upcoming ggplot2
  9. 3y agogghighlightline_label_type adds geomtextpath and second-axis labelling
  10. 4y agogghighlightDeprecated dplyr::across() usage removed
  11. 5y agogghighlightExplicit NULL in unhighlighted_params preserved; aesthetic name clash fixed
  12. 5y agogghighlightDiscrete-scale labels and n() predicates

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between gghighlight and robma?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. gghighlight and robma are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is gghighlight better than robma?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. gghighlight and robma are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to gghighlight?

Top gghighlight alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "gghighlight alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/gghighlight for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to robma?

Top robma alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "robma alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/robma for the full list with editorial commentary on each.