← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

ggfootball vs humind

A side-by-side editorial comparison of ggfootball and humind — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-packagebreaking-changes

ggfootball vs humind: at a glance

Featureggfootballhumind
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.03.8
Sparks · 30d00
Top themessports-analytics, r-package, data-scraping, expected-goalshumanitarian-analytics, needs-assessment, r-package, breaking-changes
Last editorial update48m ago4h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is ggfootball?

A football-viz package just swapped scraping for an API and broke its own output to do it.

ggfootball is a small R package for plotting expected-goals and shot data, sourced from Understat. Four releases are visible. The 0.2.x line was argument tidying and dependency pruning; 0.3.0 replaced the data-acquisition layer wholesale, moving get_match_shots() from HTML parsing onto Understat's AJAX endpoints and changing the returned column names in the process.

Read the full ggfootball trajectory →

What is humind?

The MSNI humanitarian needs framework as code, rewritten and re-broken every year

humind turns household survey data into Multi-Sector Needs Index severity scores across WASH, Protection, SNFI, Food Security, Education and Health. Its version line tracks the annual MSNI framework revision — 2024.x, 2025.x, 2026.x — with narrow correctness patches between rollouts. v2026.2.0 is the current rollout and the most structural one in the visible history: water-quantity scoring moved out into a new mandatory prerequisite, food-security severity now comes from a different matrix, and the impactR4PHU runtime dependency is gone.

Read the full humind trajectory →

ggfootball vs humind: editorial side-by-side

G
ggfootball
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A football-viz package just swapped scraping for an API and broke its own output to do it.

◆ Current state

ggfootball is a small R package for plotting expected-goals and shot data, sourced from Understat. Four releases are visible. The 0.2.x line was argument tidying and dependency pruning; 0.3.0 replaced the data-acquisition layer wholesale, moving get_match_shots() from HTML parsing onto Understat's AJAX endpoints and changing the returned column names in the process.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is away from scraped HTML and toward a thinner, more defensible package: four dependencies dropped in 0.3.0 on top of qdapRegex in 0.2.1, input validation added, error messages rewritten. Both breaking changes so far were accepted rather than deferred, which reads as a maintainer treating pre-1.0 as the window to get the shape right. The package is willing to break callers for structural reasons, not cosmetic ones.

◆ Prediction

With the scraper rebuilt and the dependency surface trimmed, the next releases are likely to stabilise the new column names and extend the plotting side, which has seen nothing since 0.2.0. A 1.0 would be the signal that the data structure is now considered fixed.

H
humind
INFRA · APIS
3.8

The MSNI humanitarian needs framework as code, rewritten and re-broken every year

◆ Current state

humind turns household survey data into Multi-Sector Needs Index severity scores across WASH, Protection, SNFI, Food Security, Education and Health. Its version line tracks the annual MSNI framework revision — 2024.x, 2025.x, 2026.x — with narrow correctness patches between rollouts. v2026.2.0 is the current rollout and the most structural one in the visible history: water-quantity scoring moved out into a new mandatory prerequisite, food-security severity now comes from a different matrix, and the impactR4PHU runtime dependency is gone.

◆ Where it's heading

Two things move together. The framework content is revised yearly — indicators added, weights corrected, instruments swapped — and the package keeps absorbing pipeline it used to delegate, most visibly by vendoring add_fcs(), add_hhs(), add_rcsi(), add_lcsi() and add_fcm_phase() locally rather than importing them. Each rollout is explicitly breaking and the release notes have grown per-function 'Action:' instructions, which reads as maintainers who expect every downstream dashboard to need rewiring on the same annual clock.

◆ Prediction

The 2025 line settled into narrow patches immediately after its rollout — 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4 fixed a separator argument, a schema rename and a shelter misclassification rather than adding indicators. Expect the 2026 line to do the same: correctness fixes against the new WASH, FCLCM and shelter-damage logic before any further framework change.

Alternatives to ggfootball and humind

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ggfootball or humind.

See all ggfootball alternatives → · See all humind alternatives →

Recent activity from ggfootball and humind

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agohumind2026 MSNI rollout: HWISE-4 prerequisite, FCLCM, impactR4PHU dropped
  2. 6mo agoggfootballggfootball 0.3.0
  3. 6mo agoggfootballggfootball 0.2.2
  4. 8mo agohumindTents reclassified as inadequate shelter
  5. 10mo agohumindFix: honour the sep argument in protection score columns
  6. 10mo agohumind'Acute need' renamed to 'severe need' across every output column
  7. 1y agohumind2025 MSNI rollout: Protection revamped, WGQ dropped from Health
  8. 1y agoggfootballggfootball 0.2.1
  9. 1y agoggfootballggfootball 0.2.0
  10. 1y agohumindScoring corrections across WASH, education, health and shelter

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between ggfootball and humind?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package, breaking-changes — within Infra & APIs. humind is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 3.8 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is ggfootball better than humind?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. humind is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 3.8 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to ggfootball?

Top ggfootball alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ggfootball alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ggfootball for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to humind?

Top humind alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "humind alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/humind for the full list with editorial commentary on each.