mlr3proba
mlr3proba is shedding weight as its survival work moves into sibling packages
Comparison · Analytics
ggeffects vs workflows
A side-by-side editorial comparison of ggeffects and workflows — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
ggeffects vs workflows: at a glance
What is ggeffects?
ggeffects hands its contrast engine to modelbased and keeps the interface
ggeffects computes and plots marginal effects for a long tail of R model classes. Its recent line has two threads: steadily broadening model support and argument surface, and repeatedly absorbing breaking changes from the packages it computes on top of. In 2.2.0 it stopped absorbing them and delegated test_predictions() and johnson_neyman() to modelbased instead.
What is workflows?
The tidymodels pipeline grew a third stage, and it happens after the model runs.
workflows bundles a preprocessor and a model into one object that tidymodels can fit, tune and extract from. Version 1.3.0 added a post stage backed by the tailor package, wired through every generic a workflow supports — augment, tidy, tunable, tune_args, required_pkgs and parameter extraction. Version 1.2.0 added sparse data support so fit() and predict() accept dgCMatrix and sparse tibbles. Earlier releases in view are boundary tightening: erroring on unknown model modes, on trained recipes, and on silently ignored formula offsets.
ggeffects vs workflows: editorial side-by-side
ggeffects
0.0ANALYTICS
ggeffects hands its contrast engine to modelbased and keeps the interface
◆ Current state
ggeffects computes and plots marginal effects for a long tail of R model classes. Its recent line has two threads: steadily broadening model support and argument surface, and repeatedly absorbing breaking changes from the packages it computes on top of. In 2.2.0 it stopped absorbing them and delegated test_predictions() and johnson_neyman() to modelbased instead.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is settling into a front-end role — a consistent predict_response() interface over other people's estimation engines — rather than owning the computation itself. The 2.x releases also show a pattern of removing deprecated arguments and clarifying mixed-model semantics, so the interface is being tightened as the backend is outsourced.
◆ Prediction
Expect the features lost in the modelbased handover to return as that package's contrast and slope estimation matures, rather than being reimplemented locally.
workflows
0.0ANALYTICS
The tidymodels pipeline grew a third stage, and it happens after the model runs.
◆ Current state
workflows bundles a preprocessor and a model into one object that tidymodels can fit, tune and extract from. Version 1.3.0 added a post stage backed by the tailor package, wired through every generic a workflow supports — augment, tidy, tunable, tune_args, required_pkgs and parameter extraction. Version 1.2.0 added sparse data support so fit() and predict() accept dgCMatrix and sparse tibbles. Earlier releases in view are boundary tightening: erroring on unknown model modes, on trained recipes, and on silently ignored formula offsets.
◆ Where it's heading
The object is filling out into a complete pipeline description rather than a preprocessing-plus-model pair. Postprocessing is the structural addition — calibration and threshold selection were previously done by hand after prediction, outside anything tidymodels could tune or record — and the fact that it arrived integrated with tunable() and tune_args() rather than as a standalone step is the point. The rest of the arc is the steady tidymodels habit of converting silent guesses into errors.
◆ Prediction
Expect tailor postprocessors to spread through tune and workflowsets next, since the parameter and tuning generics were wired up first, and expect sparse support to extend to more engines after lightgbm.
Alternatives to ggeffects and workflows
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ggeffects or workflows.
mlr3viz
mlr3viz keeps the ecosystem's plots working while the plots themselves move out
mlr3tuning
mlr3tuning is rebuilding its async machinery under a stable public surface
timetk
timetk swallowed anomalize whole, then went quiet for two years
modelbased
modelbased is turning marginal effects into a full contrast grammar
parameters
easystats' parameters package absorbs one more model class every few weeks
See all ggeffects alternatives → · See all workflows alternatives →
Recent activity from ggeffects and workflows
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 11mo agoworkflowsWorkflows gain a postprocessing stage via tailor ⚡
- 1y agoworkflowsSparse matrices work through fit() and predict()
- 1y agoggeffectsggeffects delegates contrasts and slopes to modelbased ⚡
- 1y agoggeffectsFive focal terms and formula-based contrast tests
- 1y agoggeffectsMixed-model predictions split type from interval
- 1y agoggeffectsBias correction for back-transformed mixed-model predictions
- 1y agoggeffectsSupport for WeightIt model classes
- 2y agoggeffectsglmgee support and vcov controls for ggemmeans()
- 2y agoworkflowsaugment() aligns with parsnip; censored regression supported
- 3y agoworkflowsRegister tuning generics unconditionally
- 3y agoworkflowsMissing parsnip extensions now error early; unsupervised specs supported
- 3y agoworkflowsMode guessing removed; silent offset handling now errors
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between ggeffects and workflows?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. ggeffects and workflows are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is ggeffects better than workflows?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ggeffects and workflows are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to ggeffects?
Top ggeffects alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ggeffects alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ggeffects for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to workflows?
Top workflows alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "workflows alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/workflows-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.