← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

ggdist vs sps

A side-by-side editorial comparison of ggdist and sps — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

ggdist vs sps: at a glance

Featureggdistsps
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesdata-visualization, uncertainty, bayesian-statistics, ggplot2r-package, survey-sampling, sequential-poisson, performance
Last editorial update33m ago3h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is ggdist?

The grammar of uncertainty visualization, now drawing the uncertainty in its own estimates.

ggdist supplies ggplot2 with a compositional vocabulary for distributions — slabs, intervals, dotplots and the sub-geometries that combine them. The last three years moved it from a drawing library to an estimation library: bounded density estimation with Sheather-Jones bandwidth became the default, weights propagate through every density, interval and point summary, and blurred dotplots render Monte Carlo standard error as visual fuzz. The 2025 release rounds this out with per-geometry thickness subscales and settable global defaults.

Read the full ggdist trajectory →

What is sps?

sps keeps sanding down sequential Poisson sampling rather than adding to it.

The package implements sequential Poisson sampling for survey design, covering inclusion probabilities, proportional allocation, replicate weights, and take-all strata. Recent releases are small and tightly scoped: a divisor method helper, an iterator that draws a sample one unit at a time, automatic selection of the replicate-weight parameter, and repeated performance work on inclusion probability calculation.

Read the full sps trajectory →

ggdist vs sps: editorial side-by-side

G
ggdist
INFRA · APIS
0.0

The grammar of uncertainty visualization, now drawing the uncertainty in its own estimates.

◆ Current state

ggdist supplies ggplot2 with a compositional vocabulary for distributions — slabs, intervals, dotplots and the sub-geometries that combine them. The last three years moved it from a drawing library to an estimation library: bounded density estimation with Sheather-Jones bandwidth became the default, weights propagate through every density, interval and point summary, and blurred dotplots render Monte Carlo standard error as visual fuzz. The 2025 release rounds this out with per-geometry thickness subscales and settable global defaults.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run in parallel and keep converging. One is statistical: pluggable density estimators arrived first, then became the default, then gained weights and quantile histograms. The other is compositional: sub-geometries acquired their own guides, then their own scales, so a slab's thickness axis is now a first-class annotated dimension. Cadence has stretched from twice-yearly to roughly annual, with the recent work tightening existing surface rather than opening new.

◆ Prediction

Subguides gained subscales a release later, so the remaining asymmetry is in the sub-geometry system rather than the statistics; expect the next release to continue that fill-in work.

S
sps
INFRA · APIS
2.5

sps keeps sanding down sequential Poisson sampling rather than adding to it.

◆ Current state

The package implements sequential Poisson sampling for survey design, covering inclusion probabilities, proportional allocation, replicate weights, and take-all strata. Recent releases are small and tightly scoped: a divisor method helper, an iterator that draws a sample one unit at a time, automatic selection of the replicate-weight parameter, and repeated performance work on inclusion probability calculation.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is consolidation rather than expansion. Most releases either speed up an existing routine or remove a decision the user previously had to make by hand, such as picking the smallest parameter that keeps replicate weights non-negative. Documentation and tooling get comparable attention to the algorithms, with a dedicated vignette on inclusion probabilities and a recent switch of test and documentation infrastructure. The API surface has been essentially stable across the window.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued small ergonomic and performance releases against the existing function set rather than new sampling designs, which is the pattern every release in this window follows.

Alternatives to ggdist and sps

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ggdist or sps.

See all ggdist alternatives → · See all sps alternatives →

Recent activity from ggdist and sps

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agospsDocumentation polish; switches to tinytest and litedown
  2. 9mo agospsFixes extra argument handling in sps_iterator()
  3. 11mo agospsAdds divisor_method() and a one-unit-at-a-time sampling iterator
  4. 1y agospsAdds an inclusion-probability vignette and faster partial sorting
  5. 1y agoggdistPer-geometry thickness subscales and settable defaults
  6. 1y agospsAutomatic tau selection for replicate weights
  7. 2y agoggdistBlurred dotplots draw Monte Carlo error; weights reach every estimator
  8. 2y agospsAdds becomes_ta() for take-all stratum sample sizes
  9. 2y agoggdistC++ dotplot binning and safer bandwidth fallbacks
  10. 3y agoggdistBounded density becomes the default; existing charts change
  11. 3y agoggdistCategorical distributions, hex layouts, pluggable density estimators
  12. 4y agoggdistComputed variables shared across sub-geometries

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between ggdist and sps?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. sps is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is ggdist better than sps?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. sps is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to ggdist?

Top ggdist alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ggdist alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ggdist for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to sps?

Top sps alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "sps alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/sps for the full list with editorial commentary on each.