paleobuddy
paleobuddy can now simulate trait-dependent diversification, not just birth-death.
Comparison · Analytics
geos vs seriation
A side-by-side editorial comparison of geos and seriation — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
geos vs seriation: at a glance
What is geos?
The thin GEOS binding for R adds terra interop after three years of compiler triage
geos is a low-overhead R binding to the GEOS geometry engine, exposing predicates, overlays and spatial indexes with minimal copying. Version 0.2.5 accepts terra SpatVector objects directly, alongside fixes for zero-length memcpy and plotting of invalid geometries. The releases between 0.2.0 and 0.2.5 contain almost no feature work — they are responses to compiler warnings, sanitiser findings and CRAN check failures.
What is seriation?
seriation stopped shipping algorithms and started shipping a way to pick between them.
seriation finds meaningful orderings for matrices, distance objects and dendrograms, and carries a large registry of methods from classic combinatorial criteria to t-SNE and UMAP embeddings. The 1.5.0 release added a layer above that registry — seriate_best(), seriate_rep() and seriate_improve() — which run randomized methods repeatedly, in parallel, and keep the best result. Recent work is definitional and numeric rather than additive: 1.5.8 corrects the linear seriation criterion to match Hubert and Schultz's original 1976 definition.
geos vs seriation: editorial side-by-side
geos
0.0ANALYTICS
The thin GEOS binding for R adds terra interop after three years of compiler triage
◆ Current state
geos is a low-overhead R binding to the GEOS geometry engine, exposing predicates, overlays and spatial indexes with minimal copying. Version 0.2.5 accepts terra SpatVector objects directly, alongside fixes for zero-length memcpy and plotting of invalid geometries. The releases between 0.2.0 and 0.2.5 contain almost no feature work — they are responses to compiler warnings, sanitiser findings and CRAN check failures.
◆ Where it's heading
Feature development stopped after 0.2.0 and the package has since been kept alive against a moving toolchain: strict-prototypes warnings, a clang sanitiser error, format string checks, an M1 test failure. The 0.2.5 terra support breaks that pattern and came from an outside contributor, which suggests the package's direction is now set by what neighbouring spatial packages need from it rather than by GEOS feature coverage.
◆ Prediction
GEOS has released new capabilities since the 3.11 features wired up in 0.2.0, and none have been exposed since; whether the next release closes that gap or continues as interop-and-maintenance is the open question the history does not yet answer.
seriation
0.0ANALYTICS
seriation stopped shipping algorithms and started shipping a way to pick between them.
◆ Current state
seriation finds meaningful orderings for matrices, distance objects and dendrograms, and carries a large registry of methods from classic combinatorial criteria to t-SNE and UMAP embeddings. The 1.5.0 release added a layer above that registry — seriate_best(), seriate_rep() and seriate_improve() — which run randomized methods repeatedly, in parallel, and keep the best result. Recent work is definitional and numeric rather than additive: 1.5.8 corrects the linear seriation criterion to match Hubert and Schultz's original 1976 definition.
◆ Where it's heading
The package has shifted from breadth to judgment. Through 1.3.x the additions were new methods; from 1.5.0 the registry started carrying metadata about the methods — whether they are randomized, what criterion they optimize — so the package could choose and evaluate on the user's behalf. The 1.5.6 replacement of FORTRAN with C for BEA and ME points the same way, reducing the legacy surface underneath that machinery.
◆ Prediction
Further criterion audits are the likeliest next move, since 1.5.8 shows a published definition being reconciled against the implementation and the registry now records what each method optimizes. Expect corrections rather than new seriation algorithms.
Alternatives to geos and seriation
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either geos or seriation.
geodist
geodist stays dependency-free and fast, and warns you when 'cheap' distances stop being honest.
errors
errors keeps making uncertainty print the way each scientific field expects.
CMAQ
CMAQ went global in v5.5, and has been patching that surface ever since.
enpls
enpls has not changed its statistics since 2016 — only its website, twice.
grex
grex is a lookup table with a version number — it ships when the annotation moves.
See all geos alternatives → · See all seriation alternatives →
Recent activity from geos and seriation
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 7mo agogeosAccepts terra SpatVector objects; invalid-geometry plotting fixed
- 0y agoseriationseriation 1.5.8 realigns linear criterion with Hubert and Schultz
- 1y agoseriationseriation 1.5.7 adds BK_unconstrained, handles tiny inputs
- 1y agoseriationseriation 1.5.6 replaces FORTRAN BEA with C, modernizes allocation
- 2y agoseriationseriation 1.5.5 digest: AOE method, rep parameter, MDS_angle fix
- 2y agogeosFix format string checks flagged by CRAN
- 2y agogeosNA/NaN handling adjusted for waldo; M1 test fixed
- 3y agoseriationseriation 1.5.1 refines pimage, permute and hmap
- 3y agoseriationseriation 1.5.0 adds seriate_best and parallel repeated search ⚡
- 3y agogeosSilence -Wstrict-prototypes warnings
- 3y agogeosFix clang address sanitizer error
- 3y agogeosGEOS 3.11 functions exposed; spatial tree and join helpers added
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between geos and seriation?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. geos and seriation are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is geos better than seriation?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. geos and seriation are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to geos?
Top geos alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "geos alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/geos-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to seriation?
Top seriation alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "seriation alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/seriation-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.