← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

geomander vs oblicubes

A side-by-side editorial comparison of geomander and oblicubes — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

geomander vs oblicubes: at a glance

Featuregeomanderoblicubes
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesredistricting, geospatial, political-data, r-packager, data-viz, grid-graphics, ggplot2
Last editorial update59m ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is geomander?

A redistricting toolkit that grows mostly by wiring in new public data sources

geomander provides geographic tools for redistricting analysis in R — matching and aggregating across block, VTD and district geometries, spatial diagnostics, and download helpers for the datasets the field relies on. Recent work splits between data access, with fetchers added for Jeffrey B. Lewis's historical congressional districts and RPV Near Me, and performance, with 2.5.0 delivering large speed gains in geo_match().

Read the full geomander trajectory →

What is oblicubes?

A tiny grid renderer for oblique-projection cubes, complete since its first release.

oblicubes draws 3D cubes and cuboids in oblique projection as grid grobs, with ggplot2 geom wrappers and a height-matrix helper for turning elevation data into coordinates. The entire feature set arrived in the initial 0.1.2 release, adapted from coolbutuseless's isocubes and cj-holmes's isocuboids. The two releases since have widened compatibility rather than added anything.

Read the full oblicubes trajectory →

geomander vs oblicubes: editorial side-by-side

G
geomander
ANALYTICS
0.0

A redistricting toolkit that grows mostly by wiring in new public data sources

◆ Current state

geomander provides geographic tools for redistricting analysis in R — matching and aggregating across block, VTD and district geometries, spatial diagnostics, and download helpers for the datasets the field relies on. Recent work splits between data access, with fetchers added for Jeffrey B. Lewis's historical congressional districts and RPV Near Me, and performance, with 2.5.0 delivering large speed gains in geo_match().

◆ Where it's heading

The package is consolidating as infrastructure rather than expanding its analytical surface. Each release either adds a source of redistricting data that users would otherwise download by hand, or makes the core geographic matching operations faster and more correct — the normalized global Moran's I correction and the block-level geometry mismatch fix both fall in the second category. geo_match() being the target of the most recent release confirms where the hot path is.

◆ Prediction

With geo_match() now optimised, the remaining friction is in the download helpers, several of which have needed repair after upstream changes; expect the next release to consolidate or harden those fetchers rather than add analysis functions.

O
oblicubes
ANALYTICS
0.0

A tiny grid renderer for oblique-projection cubes, complete since its first release.

◆ Current state

oblicubes draws 3D cubes and cuboids in oblique projection as grid grobs, with ggplot2 geom wrappers and a height-matrix helper for turning elevation data into coordinates. The entire feature set arrived in the initial 0.1.2 release, adapted from coolbutuseless's isocubes and cj-holmes's isocuboids. The two releases since have widened compatibility rather than added anything.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is finished and its maintainer is treating it that way. 1.0.0 removed the R 4.1 native pipe from examples specifically so earlier R versions could use it — reaching backward, not forward — and added image alt text. The only change since is swapping a deprecated dplyr call in examples.

◆ Prediction

Expect nothing beyond occasional dependency deprecation fixes; the release pattern shows a small, deliberately complete package being kept installable.

Alternatives to geomander and oblicubes

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either geomander or oblicubes.

See all geomander alternatives → · See all oblicubes alternatives →

Recent activity from geomander and oblicubes

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 6mo agooblicubesExamples updated to dplyr::reframe()
  2. 8mo agogeomanderLarge speed gains in geo_match()
  3. 1y agooblicubesR 4.1 pipe removed from examples; image alt text added
  4. 2y agogeomanderFetchers for Lewis historical districts and RPV Near Me
  5. 3y agogeomanderMaximum inscribed circle centres and BAF-to-VTD approximation
  6. 3y agooblicubesInitial release: oblique-projection cube and cuboid grobs
  7. 5y agogeomanderRepository tag marking CRAN release 1.0.8

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between geomander and oblicubes?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. geomander and oblicubes are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is geomander better than oblicubes?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. geomander and oblicubes are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to geomander?

Top geomander alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "geomander alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/geomander-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to oblicubes?

Top oblicubes alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "oblicubes alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/oblicubes-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.