← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

geoarrow-r vs modeltime.resample

A side-by-side editorial comparison of geoarrow-r and modeltime.resample — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

geoarrow-r vs modeltime.resample: at a glance

Featuregeoarrow-rmodeltime.resample
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesgeospatial, r, apache arrow, columnar formatstime series, cross-validation, tidymodels, compatibility maintenance
Last editorial update1h ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is geoarrow-r?

geoarrow tracks the GeoArrow spec and otherwise just keeps compiling

geoarrow gives R zero-copy access to geospatial data in the Arrow columnar format, with conversions to and from sf and wk. The package is thin by design — most of the work lives in vendored copies of geoarrow-c and nanoarrow — and its release notes reflect that: the substantive one in the window implemented GeoArrow 0.2 specification features, and everything since has been compiler warnings and a test fixed for a new sf version.

Read the full geoarrow-r trajectory →

What is modeltime.resample?

modeltime.resample exists to keep backtesting working as tidymodels shifts underneath it.

modeltime.resample runs time series cross-validation over modeltime models, returning per-resample predictions and accuracy plots. Version 0.3.0 is the substantive release in view: tune 2.0.0 compatibility, deterministic seeding via withr, guaranteed .predictions output, and clearer failures when resample fits break. The three releases before it are dependency chores.

Read the full modeltime.resample trajectory →

geoarrow-r vs modeltime.resample: editorial side-by-side

G
geoarrow-r
ANALYTICS
0.0

geoarrow tracks the GeoArrow spec and otherwise just keeps compiling

◆ Current state

geoarrow gives R zero-copy access to geospatial data in the Arrow columnar format, with conversions to and from sf and wk. The package is thin by design — most of the work lives in vendored copies of geoarrow-c and nanoarrow — and its release notes reflect that: the substantive one in the window implemented GeoArrow 0.2 specification features, and everything since has been compiler warnings and a test fixed for a new sf version.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is downstream of two things the package does not control: the GeoArrow specification and the C libraries it vendors. When the spec added non-PROJJSON CRS types and spheroidal edge interpolations, the R package followed; when the geoarrow.box type appeared, it gained conversions to and from wk::rct(). Between those, releases exist to keep CRAN builds green. The type-selection work in 0.4.0 — letting callers force geoarrow.wkb output when converting from sf — is the only recent change driven by R-side ergonomics rather than upstream.

◆ Prediction

Given that every feature release so far has implemented a spec revision, the next one likely arrives when GeoArrow publishes its next set of extension types rather than on any schedule of its own.

M0.0

modeltime.resample exists to keep backtesting working as tidymodels shifts underneath it.

◆ Current state

modeltime.resample runs time series cross-validation over modeltime models, returning per-resample predictions and accuracy plots. Version 0.3.0 is the substantive release in view: tune 2.0.0 compatibility, deterministic seeding via withr, guaranteed .predictions output, and clearer failures when resample fits break. The three releases before it are dependency chores.

◆ Where it's heading

Every entry here is compatibility work against something upstream — hardhat 1.0.0, workflows regression mode, then tune 2.0.0 twice. The 0.3.0 notes show a second concern emerging alongside it: making failures legible, with .notes on failed fits, actionable errors from unnest_modeltime_resamples(), and fallback logic when prediction columns go missing across versions. Reproducibility gets the same treatment through explicit seeding.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to track the next tidymodels breaking change, with any new work continuing on error reporting rather than resampling strategies.

Alternatives to geoarrow-r and modeltime.resample

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either geoarrow-r or modeltime.resample.

See all geoarrow-r alternatives → · See all modeltime.resample alternatives →

Recent activity from geoarrow-r and modeltime.resample

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2mo agogeoarrow-rgeoarrow 0.4.3
  2. 8mo agogeoarrow-rgeoarrow 0.4.1
  3. 10mo agogeoarrow-rgeoarrow lets callers choose the geometry type when converting from sf
  4. 11mo agomodeltime.resampletune 2.0 support, deterministic seeding, clearer errors
  5. 11mo agomodeltime.resampleDependency cleanup ahead of the next tune release
  6. 1y agogeoarrow-rgeoarrow implements the GeoArrow 0.2 specification features
  7. 2y agogeoarrow-rgeoarrow 0.2.1
  8. 2y agogeoarrow-rLegacy geoarrow tagged before the rewrite
  9. 3y agomodeltime.resampleFixes workflows in regression mode
  10. 4y agomodeltime.resampleUpdates for hardhat 1.0.0

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between geoarrow-r and modeltime.resample?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. geoarrow-r and modeltime.resample are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is geoarrow-r better than modeltime.resample?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. geoarrow-r and modeltime.resample are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to geoarrow-r?

Top geoarrow-r alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "geoarrow-r alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/geoarrow-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to modeltime.resample?

Top modeltime.resample alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "modeltime.resample alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/modeltime-resample for the full list with editorial commentary on each.