← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

funcharts vs texor

A side-by-side editorial comparison of funcharts and texor — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

funcharts vs texor: at a glance

Featurefunchartstexor
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesfunctional-data, control-charts, statistical-process-control, r-packagelatex, r-markdown, document-conversion, sweave
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is funcharts?

One paper, one release: the functional control chart package ships methods as they get published.

funcharts implements control charts for functional data — statistical process control where each observation is a curve rather than a number. Its release cadence maps one-to-one onto its authors' publication record: 1.4.0 delivered the robust multivariate framework from Capezza et al. (2022), 1.7.0 the adaptive chart from Centofanti et al. (2025) as it was accepted at Technometrics. Each release adds Phase I and Phase II functions for one named method.

Read the full funcharts trajectory →

What is texor?

The LaTeX-to-R-Markdown converter that stopped transcribing articles and started making them executable.

texor converts legacy R Journal articles from LaTeX into R Markdown, wrestling with the parts that never translate cleanly: numbering, cross-references, algorithm environments, and macros nobody outside the R Journal uses. Since 1.5.0 it can also emit figures as code chunks and tables as CSV read back through kable(), and target bookdown, litedown or biocstyle. The 2025 releases are repair work — pandoc keeps changing underneath it.

Read the full texor trajectory →

funcharts vs texor: editorial side-by-side

F
funcharts
INFRA · APIS
0.0

One paper, one release: the functional control chart package ships methods as they get published.

◆ Current state

funcharts implements control charts for functional data — statistical process control where each observation is a curve rather than a number. Its release cadence maps one-to-one onto its authors' publication record: 1.4.0 delivered the robust multivariate framework from Capezza et al. (2022), 1.7.0 the adaptive chart from Centofanti et al. (2025) as it was accepted at Technometrics. Each release adds Phase I and Phase II functions for one named method.

◆ Where it's heading

The early releases were about the package as software — vectorised tensor products, precomputed B-spline inner products, faster cross-validation — and about removing assumptions, most consequentially the assumption that functional data is represented in a B-spline basis. Since 1.4.0 the software work has stopped and the package has become a delivery vehicle for the research group's methods. Robustness came first, adaptivity second, both arriving with the paper rather than ahead of it.

◆ Prediction

The next release will most likely implement whatever this group publishes next, following the same Phase I / Phase II function pairing; nothing in the feed suggests infrastructure work resuming.

T
texor
INFRA · APIS
0.0

The LaTeX-to-R-Markdown converter that stopped transcribing articles and started making them executable.

◆ Current state

texor converts legacy R Journal articles from LaTeX into R Markdown, wrestling with the parts that never translate cleanly: numbering, cross-references, algorithm environments, and macros nobody outside the R Journal uses. Since 1.5.0 it can also emit figures as code chunks and tables as CSV read back through kable(), and target bookdown, litedown or biocstyle. The 2025 releases are repair work — pandoc keeps changing underneath it.

◆ Where it's heading

Two expansions define the arc. 1.4.0 took on Sweave as a source format, opening the pre-Rmd back catalogue of literate R documents. 1.5.0 changed what comes out the other end, offering executable code chunks and data files where earlier versions produced flat markup. Both moves point the same way: toward converted articles that still compute rather than merely resemble the original. Everything since has been keeping that machinery working against pandoc's release cadence.

◆ Prediction

The last two releases were both triggered by upstream pandoc changes breaking numbering or Lua filters, so the next release is most likely more of the same; new output styles remain the plausible feature direction given how recently that list was extended.

Alternatives to funcharts and texor

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either funcharts or texor.

See all funcharts alternatives → · See all texor alternatives →

Recent activity from funcharts and texor

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1y agotexorBroken figure and table numbering repaired after pandoc updates
  2. 1y agofunchartsAdaptive multivariate functional control chart added
  3. 1y agotexorDESCRIPTION path, cleanup ordering, and a pandoc filter patch
  4. 1y agotexorExecutable figure chunks, CSV-backed tables, and new vignette styles
  5. 2y agotexorSweave becomes a supported source format
  6. 2y agofunchartsRobust multivariate framework: filtering, imputation, and both phases
  7. 2y agotexorBookdown-style equation references and LaTeX macro workarounds
  8. 3y agotexorNumbering for code blocks and wide tables, plus seven more macros
  9. 3y agofunchartsAll fda basis systems accepted, not just B-splines
  10. 3y agofunchartsVectorised inner products and cross-validation, seed argument dropped

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between funcharts and texor?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. funcharts and texor are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is funcharts better than texor?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. funcharts and texor are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to funcharts?

Top funcharts alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "funcharts alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/funcharts for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to texor?

Top texor alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "texor alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/texor for the full list with editorial commentary on each.