← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

FoReco vs lintr

A side-by-side editorial comparison of FoReco and lintr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

FoReco vs lintr: at a glance

FeatureFoRecolintr
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesforecasting, hierarchical-reconciliation, time-series, s3-classesstatic-analysis, linting, code-style, native-pipe
Last editorial update54m ago6d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is FoReco?

Forecast reconciliation with a real object model, five years after it started returning bare matrices.

FoReco reconciles hierarchical forecasts across cross-sectional, temporal, and cross-temporal frameworks, and now covers both point and probabilistic reconciliation. The 1.3.0 release gave every reconciliation function a shared foreco S3 class carrying framework, function, forecast type, and reconciliation metadata, which replaced the loose attribute-and-helper pattern the package had used since 1.0.0. The follow-up 1.3.1 turned the same attention on the API's edges: strict argument validation with errors that name the expected and supplied values, and a help index pruned down to user-facing functions only.

Read the full FoReco trajectory →

What is lintr?

lintr makes the native pipe the default rule and clears out a decade of deprecations

lintr is the static analysis standard for R packages, and its 3.3.0 release does two things at once: it changes pipe_consistency_linter() to require the native pipe, following the Tidyverse Style Guide, and it completes a long deprecation program — six linters fully deprecated, several arguments defunct, and a batch of functions removed outright. The 3.1.x line before it was accuracy work and a maintainer handoff to Michael Chirico.

Read the full lintr trajectory →

FoReco vs lintr: editorial side-by-side

F
FoReco
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Forecast reconciliation with a real object model, five years after it started returning bare matrices.

◆ Current state

FoReco reconciles hierarchical forecasts across cross-sectional, temporal, and cross-temporal frameworks, and now covers both point and probabilistic reconciliation. The 1.3.0 release gave every reconciliation function a shared foreco S3 class carrying framework, function, forecast type, and reconciliation metadata, which replaced the loose attribute-and-helper pattern the package had used since 1.0.0. The follow-up 1.3.1 turned the same attention on the API's edges: strict argument validation with errors that name the expected and supplied values, and a help index pruned down to user-facing functions only.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is completing a reversal it started in 1.0.0. That release simplified outputs to plain matrices and pushed metadata into attributes reachable via recoinfo(); 1.3.0 removed recoinfo() outright and put the structure back as a class with components(), summary(), and plot() methods. The direction is toward being infrastructure rather than a function library — the class is exported through new_foreco_class() and a sibling package has already adopted it. Method coverage has meanwhile broadened from optimal combination into non-negative algorithms, bounded reconciliation, and Gaussian and sample-based probabilistic variants.

◆ Prediction

The soft-deprecated res2matrix() is flagged for removal, so a subsequent release should finish that cleanup; with the class now exported, expect more methods to hang off foreco objects rather than more top-level functions.

L
lintr
INFRA · APIS
0.0

lintr makes the native pipe the default rule and clears out a decade of deprecations

◆ Current state

lintr is the static analysis standard for R packages, and its 3.3.0 release does two things at once: it changes pipe_consistency_linter() to require the native pipe, following the Tidyverse Style Guide, and it completes a long deprecation program — six linters fully deprecated, several arguments defunct, and a batch of functions removed outright. The 3.1.x line before it was accuracy work and a maintainer handoff to Michael Chirico.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has been consolidating: overlapping linters renamed and merged, configuration validated up front, and an experimental R-script config offered as a possible replacement for the DCF format. Alongside that, a sustained campaign against false positives and false negatives in individual linters, which is where most contributor effort goes.

◆ Prediction

Expect the six warning-deprecated linters to be removed in the next release as announced, and continued movement on the R-script configuration format if feedback supports it.

Alternatives to FoReco and lintr

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either FoReco or lintr.

See all FoReco alternatives → · See all lintr alternatives →

Recent activity from FoReco and lintr

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoFoRecoStrict argument validation and a pruned help index
  2. 1mo agoFoRecoEvery reconciliation function now returns a shared foreco object
  3. 3mo agoFoRecoBootstrap functions gain xreg; simulate() argument bug fixed
  4. 5mo agoFoRecoGaussian and sample-based probabilistic reconciliation added
  5. 8mo agolintrNative pipe required by default; six linters deprecated
  6. 1y agoFoRecoBounded reconciliation and an oracle shrunk covariance estimator
  7. 1y agoFoRecoBreaking rename: cs, te and ct prefixes across all functions
  8. 2y agolintrFalse positive and negative fixes; new CRAN maintainer
  9. 2y agolintrExperimental R-script configs; up-front config validation
  10. 3y agolintrLinter renames for consistency; Super-Linter config discovery
  11. 3y agolintrTest no longer leaves cache files behind
  12. 3y agolintrfunction_argument_linter() added; seq_linter() covers dplyr and data.table

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between FoReco and lintr?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. FoReco and lintr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is FoReco better than lintr?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. FoReco and lintr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to FoReco?

Top FoReco alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "FoReco alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/foreco for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to lintr?

Top lintr alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "lintr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/lintr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.