rnaturalearth
rnaturalearth finished its sp exit and is now optimising how the data actually arrives.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of forecast and rotl — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
After years of pure maintenance, forecast 9.0.0 reopens the package
forecast is the long-established R forecasting package that fable was meant to succeed. For several years its releases were RNG fixes, base-R compatibility and documentation. Then 9.0.0 arrived with a batch of new model constructors, wider prediction-interval support and a rewritten accuracy() built on S3 methods.
rotl's whole release history is keeping name matching honest against a moving taxonomy.
Nearly every entry concerns `tnrs_match_names()`, the function that maps user-supplied names onto Open Tree taxonomy ids. 3.1.0 changed which taxon wins a multi-way match — highest matching score rather than lowest OTT id, reversing the rule 3.0.4 introduced. 3.0.12 defaulted `context_name` to 'All life' so a context inferred from the first name could not silently skew later ones. 3.0.11 made a total failure to match return an empty tibble with a warning instead of an error. The rest are small fixes tracking Open Tree API changes.
forecast is the long-established R forecasting package that fable was meant to succeed. For several years its releases were RNG fixes, base-R compatibility and documentation. Then 9.0.0 arrived with a batch of new model constructors, wider prediction-interval support and a rewritten accuracy() built on S3 methods.
The major version reframes forecast around explicit *_model() constructors — mean, random walk, spline, theta, Croston — rather than the older function-per-method style, and the 9.0.x patches since have been performance and argument-handling cleanups on top. That is an active maintenance line, not a package winding down in favour of fable.
Expect continued 9.0.x patches consolidating the new constructors and their forecast methods, with the older interfaces kept working alongside them.
Nearly every entry concerns `tnrs_match_names()`, the function that maps user-supplied names onto Open Tree taxonomy ids. 3.1.0 changed which taxon wins a multi-way match — highest matching score rather than lowest OTT id, reversing the rule 3.0.4 introduced. 3.0.12 defaulted `context_name` to 'All life' so a context inferred from the first name could not silently skew later ones. 3.0.11 made a total failure to match return an empty tibble with a warning instead of an error. The rest are small fixes tracking Open Tree API changes.
The recurring problem is ambiguity: names match several taxa, and the package has changed its tie-breaking rule twice while making failures and edge cases return predictable objects rather than errors. Nothing here expands what rotl can retrieve; it makes what it retrieves reproducible. The feed also stops in mid-2023, so the package appears dormant.
Nothing in the window suggests new capability. If a release comes, the pattern says it will follow an Open Tree API change or another matching-behaviour correction.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either forecast or rotl.
rnaturalearth finished its sp exit and is now optimising how the data actually arrives.
writexl spent nine years refusing to do formatting, then shipped all of it in 2.0.0.
rgbif is steadily pushing users off paged searching and onto real downloads.
rstanarm is community-maintained now, tracking Stan and lme4 rather than adding models.
taxa started a ground-up rewrite in 2021 and has published almost nothing since.
taxize spends its releases absorbing other people's API changes, one dead source at a time.
See all forecast alternatives → · See all rotl alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. forecast and rotl are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. forecast and rotl are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top forecast alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "forecast alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/forecast-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top rotl alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rotl alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rotl for the full list with editorial commentary on each.