← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

forcis vs ymlthis

A side-by-side editorial comparison of forcis and ymlthis — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

forcis vs ymlthis: at a glance

Featureforcisymlthis
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesdata-access, r-package, ropensci, oceanographyr-markdown, yaml, retirement, quarto
Last editorial update54m ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is forcis?

A foraminifera data-access package whose entire release history is the rOpenSci review process.

forcis provides R access to the FORCIS database of planktonic foraminifera occurrences. All three releases in the window are review milestones rather than feature work: first stable release, the release answering rOpenSci reviewer comments, and a post-CRAN-review polish. Release notes point at NEWS.md rather than enumerating changes.

Read the full forcis trajectory →

What is ymlthis?

ymlthis retired itself, naming Quarto as the reason it no longer needs to exist.

ymlthis built R Markdown YAML front matter programmatically — a fluent `yml_*()` interface plus RStudio add-ins, so users did not have to hand-write metadata blocks whose valid fields were scattered across output-format documentation. Version 1.0.0 declares the package retired, with only CRAN-preserving changes to follow, and states the reason plainly: Quarto now provides good YAML support.

Read the full ymlthis trajectory →

forcis vs ymlthis: editorial side-by-side

F
forcis
ANALYTICS
0.0

A foraminifera data-access package whose entire release history is the rOpenSci review process.

◆ Current state

forcis provides R access to the FORCIS database of planktonic foraminifera occurrences. All three releases in the window are review milestones rather than feature work: first stable release, the release answering rOpenSci reviewer comments, and a post-CRAN-review polish. Release notes point at NEWS.md rather than enumerating changes.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is moving from research artifact to reviewed, distributable infrastructure — submitted to rOpenSci at 0.1.0, integrated review feedback at 1.0.0, cleared CRAN at 1.0.1. That arc is complete, so the next phase should be the first release driven by users rather than reviewers.

◆ Prediction

With review and CRAN acceptance both behind it, the next release is most likely to track upstream FORCIS database changes or add query conveniences; the entries themselves say nothing about planned features.

Y
ymlthis
ANALYTICS
0.0

ymlthis retired itself, naming Quarto as the reason it no longer needs to exist.

◆ Current state

ymlthis built R Markdown YAML front matter programmatically — a fluent `yml_*()` interface plus RStudio add-ins, so users did not have to hand-write metadata blocks whose valid fields were scattered across output-format documentation. Version 1.0.0 declares the package retired, with only CRAN-preserving changes to follow, and states the reason plainly: Quarto now provides good YAML support.

◆ Where it's heading

The retirement is the endpoint of a long drift. Between 2020 and 2022 every release was reactive — patching around a crayon update that mangled rendered YAML, tracking shiny 1.6, following roxygen2 7.0.0, fixing a typo in an add-in. No new capability has landed in six years, and the four-year gap before 1.0.0 had already answered the question the release note finally makes explicit.

◆ Prediction

Nothing further of substance is expected — the stated policy is changes only where CRAN requires them, so the next release, if any, will be a compatibility patch.

Alternatives to forcis and ymlthis

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either forcis or ymlthis.

See all forcis alternatives → · See all ymlthis alternatives →

Recent activity from forcis and ymlthis

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 5mo agoymlthisymlthis retired; Quarto covers the need
  2. 1y agoforcisPost-CRAN-review example and practice cleanup
  3. 1y agoforcis1.0.0 incorporates rOpenSci review feedback
  4. 1y agoforcisFirst stable release, submitted to rOpenSci
  5. 4y agoymlthisTypo fixed in the miniUI add-in check
  6. 4y agoymlthisyml_author() accepts yml_blank(); shiny fixes
  7. 4y agoymlthisciteproc handling moved to newer rmarkdown functions
  8. 5y agoymlthisPatched a crayon update that mangled rendered YAML
  9. 5y agoymlthisAdjustments for shiny 1.6

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between forcis and ymlthis?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. forcis and ymlthis are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is forcis better than ymlthis?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. forcis and ymlthis are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to forcis?

Top forcis alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "forcis alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/forcis for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to ymlthis?

Top ymlthis alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ymlthis alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ymlthis for the full list with editorial commentary on each.