tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
forcis vs tern
A side-by-side editorial comparison of forcis and tern — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
forcis vs tern: at a glance
What is forcis?
A foraminifera data-access package whose entire release history is the rOpenSci review process.
forcis provides R access to the FORCIS database of planktonic foraminifera occurrences. All three releases in the window are review milestones rather than feature work: first stable release, the release answering rOpenSci reviewer comments, and a post-CRAN-review polish. Release notes point at NEWS.md rather than enumerating changes.
What is tern?
tern is migrating its entire analysis-function catalogue off make_afun(), one release at a time.
tern builds the clinical-trial tables, listings, and graphs layer on top of rtables — occurrence counts, survival summaries, ANCOVA, incidence rates, subgroup and biomarker tabulations. The visible work across the window is a systematic refactor: dozens of analysis functions rewritten to drop make_afun() and adopt a common analysis-function style driven by rtables' additional_fun_params. Feature additions ride along with it.
forcis vs tern: editorial side-by-side
forcis
0.0ANALYTICS
A foraminifera data-access package whose entire release history is the rOpenSci review process.
◆ Current state
forcis provides R access to the FORCIS database of planktonic foraminifera occurrences. All three releases in the window are review milestones rather than feature work: first stable release, the release answering rOpenSci reviewer comments, and a post-CRAN-review polish. Release notes point at NEWS.md rather than enumerating changes.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is moving from research artifact to reviewed, distributable infrastructure — submitted to rOpenSci at 0.1.0, integrated review feedback at 1.0.0, cleared CRAN at 1.0.1. That arc is complete, so the next phase should be the first release driven by users rather than reviewers.
◆ Prediction
With review and CRAN acceptance both behind it, the next release is most likely to track upstream FORCIS database changes or add query conveniences; the entries themselves say nothing about planned features.
tern
0.0ANALYTICS
tern is migrating its entire analysis-function catalogue off make_afun(), one release at a time.
◆ Current state
tern builds the clinical-trial tables, listings, and graphs layer on top of rtables — occurrence counts, survival summaries, ANCOVA, incidence rates, subgroup and biomarker tabulations. The visible work across the window is a systematic refactor: dozens of analysis functions rewritten to drop make_afun() and adopt a common analysis-function style driven by rtables' additional_fun_params. Feature additions ride along with it.
◆ Where it's heading
This is a multi-release architectural migration, not incremental polish. Each release converts another batch of functions, and the count is large — roughly two dozen in the most recent entry alone, after a comparable batch the release before. Alongside it, the denom parameter is being threaded through counting functions and g_lineplot is accumulating layout control, both patterns of standardising arguments that previously varied per function.
◆ Prediction
The refactor should continue until the make_afun() dependency is gone entirely, with the remaining tabulate_* and biomarker functions the likely next batch; the entries give no date for completion.
Alternatives to forcis and tern
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either forcis or tern.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
Recent activity from forcis and tern
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1y agoforcisPost-CRAN-review example and practice cleanup
- 1y agoforcis1.0.0 incorporates rOpenSci review feedback
- 1y agoternTwo dozen more analysis functions drop make_afun() ⚡
- 1y agoterndenom threading, custom statistics, and compare_vars merged in
- 1y agoforcisFirst stable release, submitted to rOpenSci
- 1y agoternRisk-difference columns for subgroup tables
- 2y agoterng_lineplot gains faceting and axis controls
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between forcis and tern?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. forcis and tern are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is forcis better than tern?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. forcis and tern are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to forcis?
Top forcis alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "forcis alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/forcis for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to tern?
Top tern alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tern alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tern for the full list with editorial commentary on each.