← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

fillpattern vs rphylopic

A side-by-side editorial comparison of fillpattern and rphylopic — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:ggplot2data-visualizationr-package

fillpattern vs rphylopic: at a glance

Featurefillpatternrphylopic
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesggplot2, data-visualization, accessibility, graphicsphylogenetics, data-visualization, r-package, ggplot2
Last editorial update1h ago3h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is fillpattern?

Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes

fillpattern provides pattern fills — stripes, bricks, dots — for ggplot2 and base R graphics, aimed at figures that must stay legible in greyscale or to colour-blind readers. The 1.0.3 release is mostly defensive: size modifier strings ending in a colon no longer swap width for height, modify_size() reports invalid units instead of crashing and understands in, inches and cm, and a background colour bug in scale_fill_pattern() is fixed. The minimum R version rises to 4.2.0 for recent graphics engine features.

Read the full fillpattern trajectory →

What is rphylopic?

The R package that puts organism silhouettes on plots keeps widening where they can be drawn.

rphylopic fetches PhyloPic silhouettes and places them into R graphics — base plots, ggplot2 layers, legends, and now phylogenetic trees and igraph networks. The 1.x line has been consistent about two things: adding a new plotting context per release, and steadily replacing its early sizing vocabulary with explicit width and height arguments. Attribution handling is unusually developed for a package this size, with permalinks and per-image credit built into the retrieval functions.

Read the full rphylopic trajectory →

fillpattern vs rphylopic: editorial side-by-side

F
fillpattern
ANALYTICS
0.0

Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes

◆ Current state

fillpattern provides pattern fills — stripes, bricks, dots — for ggplot2 and base R graphics, aimed at figures that must stay legible in greyscale or to colour-blind readers. The 1.0.3 release is mostly defensive: size modifier strings ending in a colon no longer swap width for height, modify_size() reports invalid units instead of crashing and understands in, inches and cm, and a background colour bug in scale_fill_pattern() is fixed. The minimum R version rises to 4.2.0 for recent graphics engine features.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is slow and entirely reactive to how the string-based size interface fails. The pattern across releases is the same: a user hits an edge — very small fill areas in 1.0.2, malformed unit strings in 1.0.3 — and the fix is either a graceful fallback or a clearer error. Leaning on R's newer graphics engine rather than reimplementing pattern rendering keeps the package small at the cost of raising its version floor.

◆ Prediction

Expect further releases to stay in the same register: parsing and validation fixes for the size and unit interface, with the pattern set itself unlikely to change.

R
rphylopic
ANALYTICS
0.0

The R package that puts organism silhouettes on plots keeps widening where they can be drawn.

◆ Current state

rphylopic fetches PhyloPic silhouettes and places them into R graphics — base plots, ggplot2 layers, legends, and now phylogenetic trees and igraph networks. The 1.x line has been consistent about two things: adding a new plotting context per release, and steadily replacing its early sizing vocabulary with explicit width and height arguments. Attribution handling is unusually developed for a package this size, with permalinks and per-image credit built into the retrieval functions.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is expanding the set of places a silhouette can appear rather than changing what the package does. Base plots came first, then ggplot2 aesthetics and legend glyphs, then trees, then network vertices via an igraph shape registered automatically when both packages load. The other running thread is defensive maintenance against upstream churn: retries on failed API calls, fixes for ggplot2 4.0.0, and now an in-memory cache so repeated calls stop hammering the PhyloPic API. The ysize and size deprecation, opened in 1.5.0, is now complete and the arguments are scheduled for removal.

◆ Prediction

The deprecated ysize and size arguments look set to be removed in the next release, and on the pattern of the last four, another plotting context is a likelier addition than a change to the retrieval layer.

Alternatives to fillpattern and rphylopic

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either fillpattern or rphylopic.

See all fillpattern alternatives → · See all rphylopic alternatives →

Recent activity from fillpattern and rphylopic

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agorphylopicSilhouettes become igraph vertices; API responses cached
  2. 6mo agofillpatternSize string parsing fixed; invalid units now report instead of crash
  3. 8mo agorphylopicBase R phylogenies gain silhouette annotation
  4. 1y agorphylopicExplicit width and height replace the old sizing arguments
  5. 2y agofillpatternSmall fill areas no longer crash; min_size falls back to solid
  6. 2y agorphylopicSilhouette legends and attribution permalinks
  7. 2y agofillpatternfillpattern 1.0.1
  8. 2y agorphylopicSilhouette resolution helper and safer colour defaults
  9. 2y agorphylopicRendering dependencies bumped for grImport2 and rsvg

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between fillpattern and rphylopic?

Both compete on the same themes — ggplot2, data-visualization, r-package — within Analytics. fillpattern and rphylopic are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is fillpattern better than rphylopic?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. fillpattern and rphylopic are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to fillpattern?

Top fillpattern alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fillpattern alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fillpattern for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rphylopic?

Top rphylopic alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rphylopic alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rphylopic for the full list with editorial commentary on each.