← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

fillpattern vs invasimapr

A side-by-side editorial comparison of fillpattern and invasimapr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

fillpattern vs invasimapr: at a glance

Featurefillpatterninvasimapr
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesggplot2, data-visualization, accessibility, graphicsinvasion ecology, species traits, biodiversity, research software
Last editorial update1h ago5h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is fillpattern?

Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes

fillpattern provides pattern fills — stripes, bricks, dots — for ggplot2 and base R graphics, aimed at figures that must stay legible in greyscale or to colour-blind readers. The 1.0.3 release is mostly defensive: size modifier strings ending in a colon no longer swap width for height, modify_size() reports invalid units instead of crashing and understands in, inches and cm, and a background colour bug in scale_fill_pattern() is fixed. The minimum R version rises to 4.2.0 for recent graphics engine features.

Read the full fillpattern trajectory →

What is invasimapr?

invasimapr halved its install size and became citable; the science stayed put.

invasimapr estimates species invasiveness and site invasibility from trait, environmental and resident-community data, exposing a traits → competition → invasion-fitness pipeline behind seven high-level wrappers. Its three releases are all packaging and standards work: a first citable archive in June 2026, then a maturity release bringing it in line with the B-Cubed software development guide. The one behavioral addition in that release is an opt-in standardise_inputs argument on compute_invasion_fitness(), off by default.

Read the full invasimapr trajectory →

fillpattern vs invasimapr: editorial side-by-side

F
fillpattern
ANALYTICS
0.0

Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes

◆ Current state

fillpattern provides pattern fills — stripes, bricks, dots — for ggplot2 and base R graphics, aimed at figures that must stay legible in greyscale or to colour-blind readers. The 1.0.3 release is mostly defensive: size modifier strings ending in a colon no longer swap width for height, modify_size() reports invalid units instead of crashing and understands in, inches and cm, and a background colour bug in scale_fill_pattern() is fixed. The minimum R version rises to 4.2.0 for recent graphics engine features.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is slow and entirely reactive to how the string-based size interface fails. The pattern across releases is the same: a user hits an edge — very small fill areas in 1.0.2, malformed unit strings in 1.0.3 — and the fix is either a graceful fallback or a clearer error. Leaning on R's newer graphics engine rather than reimplementing pattern rendering keeps the package small at the cost of raising its version floor.

◆ Prediction

Expect further releases to stay in the same register: parsing and validation fixes for the size and unit interface, with the pattern set itself unlikely to change.

I
invasimapr
ANALYTICS
0.0

invasimapr halved its install size and became citable; the science stayed put.

◆ Current state

invasimapr estimates species invasiveness and site invasibility from trait, environmental and resident-community data, exposing a traits → competition → invasion-fitness pipeline behind seven high-level wrappers. Its three releases are all packaging and standards work: a first citable archive in June 2026, then a maturity release bringing it in line with the B-Cubed software development guide. The one behavioral addition in that release is an opt-in standardise_inputs argument on compute_invasion_fitness(), off by default.

◆ Where it's heading

The pressure is toward being installable and auditable rather than more capable — install slimmed from roughly 100 MB to 56 MB, R CMD check warnings and notes resolved, sp moved to Suggests, a Darwin Core-aligned data dictionary added, and a Zenodo concept DOI with CITATION.cff, codemeta.json and .zenodo.json. The package moves in lockstep with its B-Cubed sibling dissmapr, tagged within minutes of each other at both 0.1.0 and 0.2.1, which points at project-level standards deadlines rather than independent release decisions. Trait dispersion metrics and scenario exploration remain on the roadmap.

◆ Prediction

Standards compliance is now complete and the roadmap names functional trait dispersion metrics and scenario exploration tools, so the next release is the first that can plausibly be about invasion ecology rather than packaging.

Alternatives to fillpattern and invasimapr

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either fillpattern or invasimapr.

See all fillpattern alternatives → · See all invasimapr alternatives →

Recent activity from fillpattern and invasimapr

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoinvasimaprVersion bump; notes identical to 0.2.0
  2. 1mo agoinvasimaprB-Cubed standards alignment; install slimmed to 56 MB
  3. 1mo agoinvasimaprinvasimapr v0.1.0: First citable release
  4. 6mo agofillpatternSize string parsing fixed; invalid units now report instead of crash
  5. 2y agofillpatternSmall fill areas no longer crash; min_size falls back to solid
  6. 2y agofillpatternfillpattern 1.0.1

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between fillpattern and invasimapr?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. fillpattern and invasimapr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is fillpattern better than invasimapr?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. fillpattern and invasimapr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to fillpattern?

Top fillpattern alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fillpattern alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fillpattern for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to invasimapr?

Top invasimapr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "invasimapr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/invasimapr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.