← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

fellingdater vs sftime

A side-by-side editorial comparison of fellingdater and sftime — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

fellingdater vs sftime: at a glance

Featurefellingdatersftime
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesdendrochronology, crossdating, archaeology, ropenscispatiotemporal, r-spatial, interoperability, tidyverse-integration
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is fellingdater?

Went from estimating felling dates to doing the crossdating that produces them.

fellingdater estimates when a tree was felled from sapwood measurements, the core inference in dendrochronological dating of timber. Version 1.0.0 passed rOpenSci review with that scope, and the 2024 releases were mostly about the accompanying JOSS paper and user-supplied sapwood datasets. Version 1.2.0 changed the package's remit substantially, adding an entire trs_* family for tree-ring series handling: crossdating with multiple statistical measures, the Hollstein and Baillie-Pilcher t-value transformations, parallel variation percentages, synthetic series generation, and dated-series plotting.

Read the full fellingdater trajectory →

What is sftime?

The spatiotemporal companion to sf, moving at the pace of the packages around it.

sftime extends sf with an active time column, giving R a data frame class for data that is both spatial and temporal. Its recent history is almost entirely integration work: 0.3.0 added conversion methods from spatstat point patterns, sftrack and sftraj movement objects and cubble data frames, plus dedicated tidyr::drop_na() and dplyr::dplyr_reconstruct() methods. The two releases since are a namespace version-check correction and a switch from the magrittr pipe to the native pipe in examples.

Read the full sftime trajectory →

fellingdater vs sftime: editorial side-by-side

F
fellingdater
ANALYTICS
0.0

Went from estimating felling dates to doing the crossdating that produces them.

◆ Current state

fellingdater estimates when a tree was felled from sapwood measurements, the core inference in dendrochronological dating of timber. Version 1.0.0 passed rOpenSci review with that scope, and the 2024 releases were mostly about the accompanying JOSS paper and user-supplied sapwood datasets. Version 1.2.0 changed the package's remit substantially, adding an entire trs_* family for tree-ring series handling: crossdating with multiple statistical measures, the Hollstein and Baillie-Pilcher t-value transformations, parallel variation percentages, synthetic series generation, and dated-series plotting.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has expanded backwards along the workflow. It began at the last step — given dated series, estimate the felling date — and 1.2.0 added the step before it, establishing those dates by crossdating in the first place. Version 1.2.1 is early polish on that new surface: axis control, non-syntactic column names, encoding safety in read_fh(). The direction is a single package covering the chain from raw ring widths to a felling-date estimate.

◆ Prediction

Expect the trs_* family to keep accumulating polish and additional crossdating statistics, since it is barely a year old and 1.2.1 was already fixing its plotting and top_n behaviour. Whether the two halves of the package get unified into one workflow interface is the open question the entries do not answer.

S
sftime
ANALYTICS
0.0

The spatiotemporal companion to sf, moving at the pace of the packages around it.

◆ Current state

sftime extends sf with an active time column, giving R a data frame class for data that is both spatial and temporal. Its recent history is almost entirely integration work: 0.3.0 added conversion methods from spatstat point patterns, sftrack and sftraj movement objects and cubble data frames, plus dedicated tidyr::drop_na() and dplyr::dplyr_reconstruct() methods. The two releases since are a namespace version-check correction and a switch from the magrittr pipe to the native pipe in examples.

◆ Where it's heading

The package's job is to be interoperable, so its releases follow whatever the surrounding spatial and tidyverse packages do. The dplyr_reconstruct() work is the clearest example of why that matters: inheriting sf's method caused column binding to silently return an sf object where an sftime object was expected, which is the kind of class-preservation bug that only surfaces two steps downstream. Development is sparse, roughly one release a year.

◆ Prediction

Expect further conversion methods as new spatiotemporal classes appear in the R spatial ecosystem, and continued tracking of dplyr and tidyr generics. The entries do not indicate any planned change to the sftime class itself.

Alternatives to fellingdater and sftime

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either fellingdater or sftime.

See all fellingdater alternatives → · See all sftime alternatives →

Recent activity from fellingdater and sftime

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3mo agosftimeExamples switched to the native R pipe
  2. 4mo agofellingdaterPolish for the crossdating plots and file reader
  3. 11mo agosftimeFixes the cubble namespace version check
  4. 1y agofellingdaterAdds a full crossdating and tree-ring analysis toolkit
  5. 1y agofellingdaterUser-supplied sapwood data works across all functions
  6. 1y agofellingdaterFixes fd_report() with user-defined sapwood files
  7. 1y agosftimeConverts from spatstat, sftrack and cubble objects
  8. 2y agofellingdaterJOSS paper accepted; citation updated
  9. 2y agofellingdaterAdds a workflow vignette ahead of JOSS submission

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between fellingdater and sftime?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. fellingdater and sftime are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is fellingdater better than sftime?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. fellingdater and sftime are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to fellingdater?

Top fellingdater alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fellingdater alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fellingdater for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to sftime?

Top sftime alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "sftime alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/sftime for the full list with editorial commentary on each.