← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

fellingdater vs serofoi

A side-by-side editorial comparison of fellingdater and serofoi — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

fellingdater vs serofoi: at a glance

Featurefellingdaterserofoi
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesdendrochronology, crossdating, archaeology, ropensciepiverse-trace, serology, force-of-infection, bayesian-inference
Last editorial update1h ago4h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is fellingdater?

Went from estimating felling dates to doing the crossdating that produces them.

fellingdater estimates when a tree was felled from sapwood measurements, the core inference in dendrochronological dating of timber. Version 1.0.0 passed rOpenSci review with that scope, and the 2024 releases were mostly about the accompanying JOSS paper and user-supplied sapwood datasets. Version 1.2.0 changed the package's remit substantially, adding an entire trs_* family for tree-ring series handling: crossdating with multiple statistical measures, the Hollstein and Baillie-Pilcher t-value transformations, parallel variation percentages, synthetic series generation, and dated-series plotting.

Read the full fellingdater trajectory →

What is serofoi?

serofoi grew a serosurvey simulator alongside the force-of-infection models it was built to fit.

serofoi estimates the force of infection from serological survey data using Bayesian serocatalytic models fitted through Stan. Beyond fitting it now simulates serosurveys — specifying a model and a survey design and generating the data such a survey would produce. The most recent release is visualisation and naming work.

Read the full serofoi trajectory →

fellingdater vs serofoi: editorial side-by-side

F
fellingdater
ANALYTICS
0.0

Went from estimating felling dates to doing the crossdating that produces them.

◆ Current state

fellingdater estimates when a tree was felled from sapwood measurements, the core inference in dendrochronological dating of timber. Version 1.0.0 passed rOpenSci review with that scope, and the 2024 releases were mostly about the accompanying JOSS paper and user-supplied sapwood datasets. Version 1.2.0 changed the package's remit substantially, adding an entire trs_* family for tree-ring series handling: crossdating with multiple statistical measures, the Hollstein and Baillie-Pilcher t-value transformations, parallel variation percentages, synthetic series generation, and dated-series plotting.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has expanded backwards along the workflow. It began at the last step — given dated series, estimate the felling date — and 1.2.0 added the step before it, establishing those dates by crossdating in the first place. Version 1.2.1 is early polish on that new surface: axis control, non-syntactic column names, encoding safety in read_fh(). The direction is a single package covering the chain from raw ring widths to a felling-date estimate.

◆ Prediction

Expect the trs_* family to keep accumulating polish and additional crossdating statistics, since it is barely a year old and 1.2.1 was already fixing its plotting and top_n behaviour. Whether the two halves of the package get unified into one workflow interface is the open question the entries do not answer.

S
serofoi
ANALYTICS
0.0

serofoi grew a serosurvey simulator alongside the force-of-infection models it was built to fit.

◆ Current state

serofoi estimates the force of infection from serological survey data using Bayesian serocatalytic models fitted through Stan. Beyond fitting it now simulates serosurveys — specifying a model and a survey design and generating the data such a survey would produce. The most recent release is visualisation and naming work.

◆ Where it's heading

The package moved from fitting-only to a fit-and-simulate pair. 0.1.0 added simulation from time- or age-varying force-of-infection trends and simplified the fitted object down to a Stan fit; 1.0.2 broadened simulation into full serosurvey generation with its own vignette. 1.0.3 then spent its effort on naming consistency and plotting options, which is what a package does once its scope is set.

◆ Prediction

With simulation and fitting both in place, the natural next step is tooling that closes the loop between them — recovery checks or study-design guidance built on simulated surveys.

Alternatives to fellingdater and serofoi

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either fellingdater or serofoi.

See all fellingdater alternatives → · See all serofoi alternatives →

Recent activity from fellingdater and serofoi

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 4mo agofellingdaterPolish for the crossdating plots and file reader
  2. 1y agofellingdaterAdds a full crossdating and tree-ring analysis toolkit
  3. 1y agofellingdaterUser-supplied sapwood data works across all functions
  4. 1y agofellingdaterFixes fd_report() with user-defined sapwood files
  5. 1y agoserofoiConstant FoI plots, r-hat plotting and shorter parameter names
  6. 1y agoserofoiSerological surveys can now be simulated end to end
  7. 2y agofellingdaterJOSS paper accepted; citation updated
  8. 2y agofellingdaterAdds a workflow vignette ahead of JOSS submission
  9. 2y agoserofoiSimulation functions added; fitted output simplified to a Stan fit
  10. 3y agoserofoiFirst release: three force-of-infection models and the core modules

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between fellingdater and serofoi?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. fellingdater and serofoi are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is fellingdater better than serofoi?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. fellingdater and serofoi are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to fellingdater?

Top fellingdater alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fellingdater alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fellingdater for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to serofoi?

Top serofoi alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "serofoi alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/serofoi for the full list with editorial commentary on each.