← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

fellingdater vs hoardr

A side-by-side editorial comparison of fellingdater and hoardr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:ropenscir-package

fellingdater vs hoardr: at a glance

Featurefellingdaterhoardr
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesdendrochronology, crossdating, archaeology, ropenscicaching, r-package, ropensci, infrastructure
Last editorial update4h ago58m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is fellingdater?

Went from estimating felling dates to doing the crossdating that produces them.

fellingdater estimates when a tree was felled from sapwood measurements, the core inference in dendrochronological dating of timber. Version 1.0.0 passed rOpenSci review with that scope, and the 2024 releases were mostly about the accompanying JOSS paper and user-supplied sapwood datasets. Version 1.2.0 changed the package's remit substantially, adding an entire trs_* family for tree-ring series handling: crossdating with multiple statistical measures, the Hollstein and Baillie-Pilcher t-value transformations, parallel variation percentages, synthetic series generation, and dated-series plotting.

Read the full fellingdater trajectory →

What is hoardr?

A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.

hoardr manages local cache directories for other R packages — where files go, how they are keyed, whether they exist. It underpins caching in several rOpenSci data clients. The last functional additions were in 2018; everything since is a patch issued because CRAN reported a test failure or the maintainer changed.

Read the full hoardr trajectory →

fellingdater vs hoardr: editorial side-by-side

F
fellingdater
ANALYTICS
0.0

Went from estimating felling dates to doing the crossdating that produces them.

◆ Current state

fellingdater estimates when a tree was felled from sapwood measurements, the core inference in dendrochronological dating of timber. Version 1.0.0 passed rOpenSci review with that scope, and the 2024 releases were mostly about the accompanying JOSS paper and user-supplied sapwood datasets. Version 1.2.0 changed the package's remit substantially, adding an entire trs_* family for tree-ring series handling: crossdating with multiple statistical measures, the Hollstein and Baillie-Pilcher t-value transformations, parallel variation percentages, synthetic series generation, and dated-series plotting.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has expanded backwards along the workflow. It began at the last step — given dated series, estimate the felling date — and 1.2.0 added the step before it, establishing those dates by crossdating in the first place. Version 1.2.1 is early polish on that new surface: axis control, non-syntactic column names, encoding safety in read_fh(). The direction is a single package covering the chain from raw ring widths to a felling-date estimate.

◆ Prediction

Expect the trs_* family to keep accumulating polish and additional crossdating statistics, since it is barely a year old and 1.2.1 was already fixing its plotting and top_n behaviour. Whether the two halves of the package get unified into one workflow interface is the open question the entries do not answer.

H
hoardr
ANALYTICS
0.0

A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.

◆ Current state

hoardr manages local cache directories for other R packages — where files go, how they are keyed, whether they exist. It underpins caching in several rOpenSci data clients. The last functional additions were in 2018; everything since is a patch issued because CRAN reported a test failure or the maintainer changed.

◆ Where it's heading

This is infrastructure that has reached its final shape. Three of the last three releases were reactive: two responses to CRAN test-failure notifications, one to a maintainer handover. The single behavioural change in that stretch — forward slashes in paths on every operating system — is a consistency fix for downstream packages rather than a feature. Its release cadence is set by CRAN's checks, not by demand.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to be triggered by another CRAN check failure rather than by new functionality, matching every release since 2018.

Alternatives to fellingdater and hoardr

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either fellingdater or hoardr.

See all fellingdater alternatives → · See all hoardr alternatives →

Recent activity from fellingdater and hoardr

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 4mo agofellingdaterPolish for the crossdating plots and file reader
  2. 1y agofellingdaterAdds a full crossdating and tree-ring analysis toolkit
  3. 1y agofellingdaterUser-supplied sapwood data works across all functions
  4. 1y agofellingdaterFixes fd_report() with user-defined sapwood files
  5. 1y agohoardrPaths use forward slashes on every platform
  6. 2y agofellingdaterJOSS paper accepted; citation updated
  7. 2y agofellingdaterAdds a workflow vignette ahead of JOSS submission
  8. 2y agohoardrTest-only patch for a CRAN failure
  9. 3y agohoardrPatch release for maintainer handover
  10. 7y agohoardrFixes cache paths leaking between HoardClient instances
  11. 7y agohoardrFile-existence checks and full-path cache configuration
  12. 9y agohoardrCRAN disk-writing policy compliance

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between fellingdater and hoardr?

Both compete on the same themes — ropensci, r-package — within Analytics. fellingdater and hoardr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is fellingdater better than hoardr?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. fellingdater and hoardr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to fellingdater?

Top fellingdater alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fellingdater alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fellingdater for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to hoardr?

Top hoardr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "hoardr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/hoardr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.