← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

FedData vs fellingdater

A side-by-side editorial comparison of FedData and fellingdater — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:ropenscir-package

FedData vs fellingdater: at a glance

FeatureFedDatafellingdater
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesropensci, geospatial, r-package, open-datadendrochronology, crossdating, archaeology, ropensci
Last editorial update2h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is FedData?

FedData has spent two major versions migrating US federal geodata off R's retiring spatial stack.

FedData downloads and standardises US federal geospatial datasets — NLCD, NHD, NED, SSURGO, Daymet, GHCN, PAD-US, NASS — into consistent R objects. Two breaking majors define the current package: 3.0.0 moved returns to sf and raster and pulled data from cloud-optimised GeoTIFFs, and 4.0.0 finished the job by dropping sp and raster entirely for terra and sf. Recent releases are dataset refreshes, most recently PAD-US 4.0.

Read the full FedData trajectory →

What is fellingdater?

Went from estimating felling dates to doing the crossdating that produces them.

fellingdater estimates when a tree was felled from sapwood measurements, the core inference in dendrochronological dating of timber. Version 1.0.0 passed rOpenSci review with that scope, and the 2024 releases were mostly about the accompanying JOSS paper and user-supplied sapwood datasets. Version 1.2.0 changed the package's remit substantially, adding an entire trs_* family for tree-ring series handling: crossdating with multiple statistical measures, the Hollstein and Baillie-Pilcher t-value transformations, parallel variation percentages, synthetic series generation, and dated-series plotting.

Read the full fellingdater trajectory →

FedData vs fellingdater: editorial side-by-side

F
FedData
ANALYTICS
0.0

FedData has spent two major versions migrating US federal geodata off R's retiring spatial stack.

◆ Current state

FedData downloads and standardises US federal geospatial datasets — NLCD, NHD, NED, SSURGO, Daymet, GHCN, PAD-US, NASS — into consistent R objects. Two breaking majors define the current package: 3.0.0 moved returns to sf and raster and pulled data from cloud-optimised GeoTIFFs, and 4.0.0 finished the job by dropping sp and raster entirely for terra and sf. Recent releases are dataset refreshes, most recently PAD-US 4.0.

◆ Where it's heading

The package tracks two moving targets at once: the R spatial stack, which it has now fully migrated onto terra and sf, and the federal agencies whose URLs, file naming and hosting keep shifting. With the dependency migration finished, releases have shrunk to single-dataset updates such as annual NLCD and PAD-US 4.0, which suggests the structural work is done and the ongoing cost is data-source maintenance.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued small releases pinned to new vintages of the underlying federal datasets, plus fixes when an agency moves or reformats a source; no further dependency-level upheaval is visible in these entries.

F
fellingdater
ANALYTICS
0.0

Went from estimating felling dates to doing the crossdating that produces them.

◆ Current state

fellingdater estimates when a tree was felled from sapwood measurements, the core inference in dendrochronological dating of timber. Version 1.0.0 passed rOpenSci review with that scope, and the 2024 releases were mostly about the accompanying JOSS paper and user-supplied sapwood datasets. Version 1.2.0 changed the package's remit substantially, adding an entire trs_* family for tree-ring series handling: crossdating with multiple statistical measures, the Hollstein and Baillie-Pilcher t-value transformations, parallel variation percentages, synthetic series generation, and dated-series plotting.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has expanded backwards along the workflow. It began at the last step — given dated series, estimate the felling date — and 1.2.0 added the step before it, establishing those dates by crossdating in the first place. Version 1.2.1 is early polish on that new surface: axis control, non-syntactic column names, encoding safety in read_fh(). The direction is a single package covering the chain from raw ring widths to a felling-date estimate.

◆ Prediction

Expect the trs_* family to keep accumulating polish and additional crossdating statistics, since it is barely a year old and 1.2.1 was already fixing its plotting and top_n behaviour. Whether the two halves of the package get unified into one workflow interface is the open question the entries do not answer.

Alternatives to FedData and fellingdater

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either FedData or fellingdater.

See all FedData alternatives → · See all fellingdater alternatives →

Recent activity from FedData and fellingdater

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 4mo agofellingdaterPolish for the crossdating plots and file reader
  2. 1y agofellingdaterAdds a full crossdating and tree-ring analysis toolkit
  3. 1y agofellingdaterUser-supplied sapwood data works across all functions
  4. 1y agofellingdaterFixes fd_report() with user-defined sapwood files
  5. 1y agoFedDataget_padus() updated to PAD-US 4.0
  6. 1y agoFedDataAnnual NLCD access added; get_nass() retired
  7. 2y agofellingdaterJOSS paper accepted; citation updated
  8. 2y agofellingdaterAdds a workflow vignette ahead of JOSS submission
  9. 2y agoFedDatasp and raster dropped; everything returns terra or sf
  10. 3y agoFedDataGHCN moves to https; NHD handles empty and odd geometries
  11. 3y agoFedDataAll raster writing moves to terra
  12. 3y agoFedDataVersion 3 rebuilds on sf and cloud-optimised GeoTIFFs

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between FedData and fellingdater?

Both compete on the same themes — ropensci, r-package — within Analytics. FedData and fellingdater are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is FedData better than fellingdater?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. FedData and fellingdater are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to FedData?

Top FedData alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "FedData alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/feddata for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to fellingdater?

Top fellingdater alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fellingdater alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fellingdater for the full list with editorial commentary on each.