← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

fect vs questionr

A side-by-side editorial comparison of fect and questionr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

fect vs questionr: at a glance

Featurefectquestionr
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr-package, causal-inference, panel-data, api-redesignsurvey analysis, contingency tables, rstudio addins, tidyverse compatibility
Last editorial update2h ago40m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is fect?

A counterfactual estimator turning itself into a platform for multiple estimands

fect implements counterfactual estimators for panel data with treatment effects — imputation-based fixed effects, interactive fixed effects, matrix completion. The 2026 releases move fast and bundle heavily: 2.1.0 rewrote complex fixed effect handling, 2.2.0 unified cross-validation under a single cv.method parameter and replaced method='gsynth' with an explicit time.component.from switch, 2.4.1 introduced a post-hoc estimand API, and 2.4.5 added group.fe for coarsened fixed effects plus a $sample slot exposing which cells entered estimation.

Read the full fect trajectory →

What is questionr?

questionr's survey helpers are finished; recent releases only keep pace with R-devel.

A long-running toolkit for survey data in R — proportion tables, weighted counts, and the interactive irec(), iorder() and icut() addins for recoding. The last functional release was 0.8.0 in March 2025: a new freqtable() function, prop(), cprop() and rprop() extended to tables of three or more dimensions, and the addins moved onto the native pipe and forcats' current API. Both releases since exist purely to fix tests broken by R-devel changes to table internals.

Read the full questionr trajectory →

fect vs questionr: editorial side-by-side

F
fect
ANALYTICS
0.0

A counterfactual estimator turning itself into a platform for multiple estimands

◆ Current state

fect implements counterfactual estimators for panel data with treatment effects — imputation-based fixed effects, interactive fixed effects, matrix completion. The 2026 releases move fast and bundle heavily: 2.1.0 rewrote complex fixed effect handling, 2.2.0 unified cross-validation under a single cv.method parameter and replaced method='gsynth' with an explicit time.component.from switch, 2.4.1 introduced a post-hoc estimand API, and 2.4.5 added group.fe for coarsened fixed effects plus a $sample slot exposing which cells entered estimation.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is separation of estimation from interpretation. Where the package once returned one effect from one fit, estimand() now dispatches typed estimands — ATT, cumulative ATT, APTT, log ATT — from any imputation fit, with effect() and att.cumu() soft-deprecated but byte-identical pending 3.0.0. Alongside that runs a transparency thread: the $sample matrix, out-of-sample comparison via fect_mspe(), and named component sources instead of opaque method aliases. The release notes are unusually precise about which results change and which do not.

◆ Prediction

The soft-deprecation notice names 3.0.0 as the removal point for effect() and att.cumu(), so a major release consolidating on the estimand() dispatcher is the clearly signposted next step.

Q
questionr
ANALYTICS
0.0

questionr's survey helpers are finished; recent releases only keep pace with R-devel.

◆ Current state

A long-running toolkit for survey data in R — proportion tables, weighted counts, and the interactive irec(), iorder() and icut() addins for recoding. The last functional release was 0.8.0 in March 2025: a new freqtable() function, prop(), cprop() and rprop() extended to tables of three or more dimensions, and the addins moved onto the native pipe and forcats' current API. Both releases since exist purely to fix tests broken by R-devel changes to table internals.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a stable package in compatibility-maintenance mode, where the release trigger is upstream churn rather than user demand. The functional work that does appear follows a consistent line — generalising the table functions beyond two dimensions, and keeping the interactive recoding addins aligned with current tidyverse idioms rather than the deprecated ones they were written against. The same maintainer's rainette shipped its own upstream-compatibility fix in the same window.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to be another R-devel or tidyverse compatibility fix; nothing in the entries points to new functionality.

Alternatives to fect and questionr

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either fect or questionr.

See all fect alternatives → · See all questionr alternatives →

Recent activity from fect and questionr

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2mo agofectAdds group.fe for coarsened fixed effects and a $sample slot
  2. 3mo agofectPost-hoc estimand API decouples estimands from the fit
  3. 4mo agofectUnified cross-validation and explicit control of time components
  4. 6mo agoquestionrR-devel test fix for NA naming in tables
  5. 7mo agofectRewrites complex fixed effect handling and fixes speed
  6. 11mo agofectAdds heterogeneous treatment effect plots and caps default cores
  7. 1y agoquestionrR-devel test fix for table subset classes
  8. 1y agoquestionrfreqtable added; proportion tables handle three or more dimensions
  9. 3y agoquestionrAddins handle non-syntactic variable names
  10. 4y agoquestionrforcats errors on numeric variables fixed
  11. 4y agoquestionricut default changed; rp2018 dataset replaces rp99

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between fect and questionr?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. fect and questionr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is fect better than questionr?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. fect and questionr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to fect?

Top fect alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fect alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fect for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to questionr?

Top questionr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "questionr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/questionr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.