n2kanalysis
n2kanalysis has spent eight years wiring INLA models to an S3 bucket.
Comparison · Analytics
fastplyr vs ggsci
A side-by-side editorial comparison of fastplyr and ggsci — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
fastplyr vs ggsci: at a glance
What is fastplyr?
A fast dplyr stand-in that keeps finding new places to skip work entirely.
fastplyr reimplements the dplyr verbs on a faster backend, exposing f_summarise, f_mutate, f_reframe and a set of group metadata helpers alongside optimized joins and quantiles. The most recent release removes non-API C functions and raises the floor to R 4.5.0, a steep requirement that follows the C++17 requirement introduced a release earlier. The verb surface itself has been stable since 0.9.0.
What is ggsci?
ggsci quietly became a palette mirror, then taught itself to generate colors on demand
ggsci ships ready-made ggplot2 color scales, originally journal and sci-fi palettes and now overwhelmingly terminal themes — the iTerm collection has grown past 400 entries and picks up 30 to 70 more with each sync. The one structural change in the recent run is gephi_palettes(), which generates distinct categorical colors for an arbitrary number of levels rather than serving a fixed list. Release cadence is steady, roughly every six to eight weeks.
fastplyr vs ggsci: editorial side-by-side
fastplyr
0.0ANALYTICS
A fast dplyr stand-in that keeps finding new places to skip work entirely.
◆ Current state
fastplyr reimplements the dplyr verbs on a faster backend, exposing f_summarise, f_mutate, f_reframe and a set of group metadata helpers alongside optimized joins and quantiles. The most recent release removes non-API C functions and raises the floor to R 4.5.0, a steep requirement that follows the C++17 requirement introduced a release earlier. The verb surface itself has been stable since 0.9.0.
◆ Where it's heading
The optimization strategy has shifted from making individual functions fast to reasoning about expressions before evaluating them — 0.9.9 began marking simple operators as group-unaware so expressions built only from them are evaluated across the whole data frame rather than per group. That is a structural bet: the package increasingly inspects what you wrote to decide how much work is actually needed. Running alongside it is a steady tightening of build requirements, with C++17, R 4.5.0 and CRAN's C API rules all landing within a year.
◆ Prediction
Expect the group-unaware classification to widen to more functions, since each addition compounds across every grouped expression, and expect the dependency floors to keep rising as the package tracks CRAN's compiled-code policy.
ggsci
2.5ANALYTICS
ggsci quietly became a palette mirror, then taught itself to generate colors on demand
◆ Current state
ggsci ships ready-made ggplot2 color scales, originally journal and sci-fi palettes and now overwhelmingly terminal themes — the iTerm collection has grown past 400 entries and picks up 30 to 70 more with each sync. The one structural change in the recent run is gephi_palettes(), which generates distinct categorical colors for an arbitrary number of levels rather than serving a fixed list. Release cadence is steady, roughly every six to eight weeks.
◆ Where it's heading
Two threads run in parallel. The larger one is curation: ggsci has effectively become a distribution channel for upstream color work, adding design-system palettes (Primer, Atlassian, Bootstrap, Tailwind) and re-syncing iTerm as that project changes, including correcting existing color values when upstream moves. The smaller and more interesting one is generation — the Gephi engine sidesteps the ceiling every fixed palette has, which is what happens when a plot needs more categories than any curated set provides.
◆ Prediction
Given how much of the release notes each cycle is a mechanical upstream sync, the plausible next step is automating those syncs rather than adding another vendor palette by hand; the Gephi generator is the more likely place any genuinely new capability appears.
Alternatives to fastplyr and ggsci
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either fastplyr or ggsci.
n1qn1c
A Fortran-descended optimizer got thread-safe, then found two flags that never worked.
ggstatsplot
ggstatsplot reached 1.0 by adding tests, having outsourced its statistics years ago.
collapse
collapse got a JSS paper and a 7x fmean speedup in the same release.
gtsummary
gtsummary is quietly rebuilding itself around analysis results data, one table verb at a time.
broadcast
broadcast is filling in NumPy-style array broadcasting for R, operator by operator.
See all fastplyr alternatives → · See all ggsci alternatives →
Recent activity from fastplyr and ggsci
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 15d agoggsciggsci 5.2.0
- 1mo agoggsciggsci 5.1.0
- 4mo agofastplyrNon-API C functions dropped, R 4.5.0 now required
- 4mo agoggsciggsci 5.0.0 generates categorical colors instead of serving a fixed list ⚡
- 4mo agoggsciggsci 4.3.0
- 8mo agoggsciggsci 4.2.0
- 8mo agofastplyrIn-place sorting arrives with a C++17 requirement
- 9mo agoggsciggsci 4.1.0
- 10mo agofastplyrGroup-unaware expressions evaluated on the whole frame
- 1y agofastplyrf_mutate and f_reframe complete the verb set
- 1y agofastplyrDynamic argument evaluation and f_pull
- 1y agofastplyrf_fill added and grouped joins repaired
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between fastplyr and ggsci?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. ggsci is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is fastplyr better than ggsci?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ggsci is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to fastplyr?
Top fastplyr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fastplyr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fastplyr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to ggsci?
Top ggsci alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ggsci alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ggsci for the full list with editorial commentary on each.