← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

fastml vs healthyR.ts

A side-by-side editorial comparison of fastml and healthyR.ts — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r package

fastml vs healthyR.ts: at a glance

FeaturefastmlhealthyR.ts
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesautoml, tidymodels, survival analysis, cross-validationtime series, healthyverse, stationarity, ggplot2
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is fastml?

fastml added survival modelling and leakage-proof resampling, moving past classification and regression.

A tidymodels-based AutoML wrapper that trains, tunes and compares many engines from one call. The 0.6.x line added engine-specific tuning parameters, class-imbalance handling, early stopping and DALEX-based explainability. The 0.7.5 release is far larger: a full survival analysis task with its own engines, MICE imputation and integrated Brier scoring, plus unbiased nested cross-validation, grouped, blocked and rolling resampling helpers, fold-wise imputation, recipe leakage checks, and a sandbox for user-supplied preprocessing.

Read the full fastml trajectory →

What is healthyR.ts?

healthyR.ts keeps adding time-series helpers, then quietly breaks the old ones to modernise them.

A time-series companion in the healthyverse family, shipping helper functions in batches: growth-rate vectors, an ADF test and auto_stationarize() in 0.2.11, then five log and differencing transforms in 0.3.0, and a random-walk plot in 0.3.2. Alongside the additions runs a steady stream of breaking cleanups — invisible returns dropped, R 4.1 required for the native pipe, and ts_ma_plot() refactored onto ggplot2 facets with its xts output removed and its return value cut from six items to two.

Read the full healthyR.ts trajectory →

fastml vs healthyR.ts: editorial side-by-side

F
fastml
ANALYTICS
0.0

fastml added survival modelling and leakage-proof resampling, moving past classification and regression.

◆ Current state

A tidymodels-based AutoML wrapper that trains, tunes and compares many engines from one call. The 0.6.x line added engine-specific tuning parameters, class-imbalance handling, early stopping and DALEX-based explainability. The 0.7.5 release is far larger: a full survival analysis task with its own engines, MICE imputation and integrated Brier scoring, plus unbiased nested cross-validation, grouped, blocked and rolling resampling helpers, fold-wise imputation, recipe leakage checks, and a sandbox for user-supplied preprocessing.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is moving from convenience wrapper to something that has to be defensible statistically. Nested cross-validation, fold-wise rather than up-front imputation, and explicit leakage checks are all corrections to the shortcuts that make AutoML easy and its scores optimistic. Survival adds a third task type alongside classification and regression, and it arrived with its own metrics rather than being bolted onto the existing ones. Note the entry body is cut off at 8,000 characters, so the release is larger than what is shown.

◆ Prediction

Expect the remaining survival engines to fill in and the sandboxing of custom preprocessing to tighten, since both were still being iterated on within this same release's commit list.

H
healthyR.ts
ANALYTICS
0.0

healthyR.ts keeps adding time-series helpers, then quietly breaks the old ones to modernise them.

◆ Current state

A time-series companion in the healthyverse family, shipping helper functions in batches: growth-rate vectors, an ADF test and auto_stationarize() in 0.2.11, then five log and differencing transforms in 0.3.0, and a random-walk plot in 0.3.2. Alongside the additions runs a steady stream of breaking cleanups — invisible returns dropped, R 4.1 required for the native pipe, and ts_ma_plot() refactored onto ggplot2 facets with its xts output removed and its return value cut from six items to two.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads, both consistent. The functional one is coverage of the stationarity workflow — transform, test, auto-stationarize, plot — assembled function by function rather than as a single API. The structural one is convergence on ggplot2 and tidy conventions, retiring xts objects and multi-object return lists as it goes. The package is not afraid to break return shapes to get there, so upgrades are not drop-in.

◆ Prediction

Expect the remaining functions that still return xts objects or bundled lists to get the same ggplot2-only treatment, since ts_ma_plot() was refactored on exactly that rationale.

Alternatives to fastml and healthyR.ts

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either fastml or healthyR.ts.

See all fastml alternatives → · See all healthyR.ts alternatives →

Recent activity from fastml and healthyR.ts

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 6mo agohealthyR.tsRandom walk plot added; ts_ma_plot drops xts for ggplot2 facets
  2. 8mo agofastmlVersion 0.7.5
  3. 1y agofastmlEngine-specific tuning, imbalance handling and explainability
  4. 1y agofastmlSingle-workflow evaluation fix
  5. 1y agofastmlVersion 0.5.0
  6. 1y agohealthyR.tsInvisible returns dropped; random walk and vva plot fixes
  7. 2y agohealthyR.tsFive log and differencing transform utilities added
  8. 2y agohealthyR.tsStationarity testing and auto_stationarize added
  9. 2y agohealthyR.tsSingle example fix
  10. 3y agohealthyR.tsBoilerplate fitting uses show_best directly

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between fastml and healthyR.ts?

Both compete on the same themes — r package — within Analytics. fastml and healthyR.ts are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is fastml better than healthyR.ts?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. fastml and healthyR.ts are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to fastml?

Top fastml alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fastml alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fastml for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to healthyR.ts?

Top healthyR.ts alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "healthyR.ts alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/healthyr-ts for the full list with editorial commentary on each.