rjd3highfreq
rjd3highfreq ships whatever the Java side ships, and only occasionally says what that was.
Comparison · Analytics
fairmodels vs weird
A side-by-side editorial comparison of fairmodels and weird — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
fairmodels vs weird: at a glance
What is fairmodels?
fairmodels sits dormant for three years, resurfacing only to satisfy a CRAN check.
fairmodels audits classification models for bias, built around fairness_check() and parity-loss metrics on top of DALEX explainers. The last substantive work dates from 2021; the 2025 release is a single-line change swapping ifelse for if/else in fairness_heatmap. Version 0.2.2 set the package's core design when it superseded metric differences with ratios.
What is weird?
weird rebuilt itself on distributional objects, and now the anomaly tooling composes with everything else.
An R package for anomaly detection and unusual-observation diagnostics, at four releases with a long gap between the 2024 patch and the 2026 major line. The current shape is set by 2.0.0, which refactored the package onto distributional objects and renamed its central concept from density_scores() to surprisals(). Since then the work has been filling that structure in: surprisals for more model classes, faster bandwidth and probability calculations, and new visual diagnostics.
fairmodels vs weird: editorial side-by-side
fairmodels
0.0ANALYTICS
fairmodels sits dormant for three years, resurfacing only to satisfy a CRAN check.
◆ Current state
fairmodels audits classification models for bias, built around fairness_check() and parity-loss metrics on top of DALEX explainers. The last substantive work dates from 2021; the 2025 release is a single-line change swapping ifelse for if/else in fairness_heatmap. Version 0.2.2 set the package's core design when it superseded metric differences with ratios.
◆ Where it's heading
The release history describes a package that reached its intended shape early and has been custodial since — the gap from August 2022 to October 2025 carries no functional change at all. What movement exists is CRAN-driven: documentation compliance, example runtimes, coding-style notes. The fairness metrics themselves have not changed since the parity_loss corrections of 2020.
◆ Prediction
On this cadence the next release is most likely another CRAN-prompted one-liner rather than new fairness metrics; nothing in these entries points to active development.
weird
0.0ANALYTICS
weird rebuilt itself on distributional objects, and now the anomaly tooling composes with everything else.
◆ Current state
An R package for anomaly detection and unusual-observation diagnostics, at four releases with a long gap between the 2024 patch and the 2026 major line. The current shape is set by 2.0.0, which refactored the package onto distributional objects and renamed its central concept from density_scores() to surprisals(). Since then the work has been filling that structure in: surprisals for more model classes, faster bandwidth and probability calculations, and new visual diagnostics.
◆ Where it's heading
The refactor onto a shared distribution representation is the decision everything else follows from. It let 2.1.0 add hdr() and parameters() methods for kde objects rather than bespoke accessors, and it let 3.0.0 bring in dist_mclust() to turn a Gaussian mixture model into the same object type — so a mixture, a kernel density estimate and a fitted distribution all flow through one interface. The 3.0.0 additions lean visual and multivariate: outlier maps plotting score distance against orthogonal distance, biplot projections with variable axes overlaid, and an augment() method for robust PCA objects. Dependencies have been shed steadily along the way — lookout, interpolation — while mvscale() moved out and then back in.
◆ Prediction
Expect surprisals() coverage to keep extending to further model classes, and the multivariate and robust-PCA diagnostics introduced in 3.0.0 to gain the same distributional-object treatment as the univariate side.
Alternatives to fairmodels and weird
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either fairmodels or weird.
audubon
audubon's release feed is almost entirely Renovate bumping the JavaScript toolchain behind its Japanese text splitter.
affiner
affiner is quietly turning a grid transformation helper into a small computational geometry library.
ageproR
ageproR spent two years chasing a moving file format, then added the recruitment models that justify the effort.
r-ledger
ledger adds a Rust toolchain fallback, so beancount imports work whether or not the Python tooling is installed.
gridpattern
gridpattern keeps widening its catalogue, and the newest patterns finally use the device's own line rendering.
See all fairmodels alternatives → · See all weird alternatives →
Recent activity from fairmodels and weird
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agoweirdOutlier maps, biplot projections, and Gaussian mixtures as distributional objects
- 3mo agoweirdsurprisals() reaches glm objects; lookout dependency dropped
- 6mo agoweirdPackage refactored onto distributional objects; density_scores becomes surprisals
- 9mo agofairmodelsOne-line fix in fairness_heatmap
- 2y agoweirdWine reviews dataset replaced with a fetch function
- 3y agofairmodelsCRAN compliance fixes and citation update
- 4y agofairmodelsCRAN v1.2.0
- 5y agofairmodelsCRAN v1.1.0
- 5y agofairmodelsDocumentation fixes and trimmed example runtimes
- 5y agofairmodelsCorrects parity_loss in the cutoff functions
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between fairmodels and weird?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. fairmodels and weird are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is fairmodels better than weird?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. fairmodels and weird are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to fairmodels?
Top fairmodels alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fairmodels alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fairmodels for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to weird?
Top weird alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "weird alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/weird-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.