qqman
The Manhattan-plot package for GWAS results, finished and dormant since 2017.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of fairmodels and fossilsim — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
fairmodels sits dormant for three years, resurfacing only to satisfy a CRAN check.
fairmodels audits classification models for bias, built around fairness_check() and parity-loss metrics on top of DALEX explainers. The last substantive work dates from 2021; the 2025 release is a single-line change swapping ifelse for if/else in fairness_heatmap. Version 0.2.2 set the package's core design when it superseded metric differences with ratios.
A fossil-record simulator that quietly grew a trait-evolution engine.
FossilSim is a mature R package for simulating fossil records on phylogenetic trees, and its release cadence reflects that: long gaps punctuated by a single capability addition. The last four releases span three years, with the most recent being a compatibility sync to its companion Shiny front-end rather than new functionality. The core simulation surface has been stable since 2022.
fairmodels audits classification models for bias, built around fairness_check() and parity-loss metrics on top of DALEX explainers. The last substantive work dates from 2021; the 2025 release is a single-line change swapping ifelse for if/else in fairness_heatmap. Version 0.2.2 set the package's core design when it superseded metric differences with ratios.
The release history describes a package that reached its intended shape early and has been custodial since — the gap from August 2022 to October 2025 carries no functional change at all. What movement exists is CRAN-driven: documentation compliance, example runtimes, coding-style notes. The fairness metrics themselves have not changed since the parity_loss corrections of 2020.
On this cadence the next release is most likely another CRAN-prompted one-liner rather than new fairness metrics; nothing in these entries points to active development.
FossilSim is a mature R package for simulating fossil records on phylogenetic trees, and its release cadence reflects that: long gaps punctuated by a single capability addition. The last four releases span three years, with the most recent being a compatibility sync to its companion Shiny front-end rather than new functionality. The core simulation surface has been stable since 2022.
The arc runs from sampling mechanics toward simulating what the organisms actually were. Version 2.2.0 taught the package to handle occurrence data for occurrence birth-death models; 2.3.0 then added trait simulation under Mk, BM and OU, which is a different kind of output than fossil ages. Since then the work has been maintenance and keeping the FossilSimShiny GUI in step, suggesting the authors consider the current model set feature-complete.
The pairing of the 2.3.3 release with a FossilSimShiny version bump points to the GUI, not the library, as where the next visible work lands. The entries do not show enough activity to predict a specific new model family.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either fairmodels or fossilsim.
The Manhattan-plot package for GWAS results, finished and dormant since 2017.
The R package for CODATA constants rebuilt its symbol table on NIST's naming so future updates stop being hand work.
The R client for AusTraits spends its releases chasing the dataset it reads.
A ggplot2 layer for seasonal adjustment output, filling in one plot type at a time.
Reference-based multiple imputation tables, shipping only what CRAN checks demand.
An MMRM tabulation package that has published nothing since its 2024 CRAN releases.
See all fairmodels alternatives → · See all fossilsim alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. fairmodels and fossilsim are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. fairmodels and fossilsim are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top fairmodels alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fairmodels alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fairmodels for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top fossilsim alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fossilsim alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fossilsim-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.