← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

excluder vs spatsoc

A side-by-side editorial comparison of excluder and spatsoc — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

excluder vs spatsoc: at a glance

Featureexcluderspatsoc
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themessurvey-data, data-cleaning, r-package, qualtricsmovement-ecology, social-networks, spatial-analysis, telemetry
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is excluder?

A Qualtrics data-cleaning package that has been in maintenance mode since its CRAN acceptance.

excluder marks, checks, and excludes online-survey rows that fail quality criteria — duplicate responses, suspicious IP or geolocation, screen resolution, completion duration, preview rows. The mark_*/check_*/exclude_* verb trio and the column-renaming helpers are the whole public surface. Recent releases are dependency chasing and test robustness rather than new exclusion criteria.

Read the full excluder trajectory →

What is spatsoc?

One maintainer, one or two new collective-motion metrics per release, for two years straight

spatsoc turns animal relocation data into spatial and social groupings — dyads, fission-fusion events, group centroids — and the recent history is a metronomic accretion of collective-motion measures on top of that base. Since late 2024 nearly every release has added one or two: polarization, direction to leader, position along the group axis, directional correlation delay, edge alignment, edge zones. Development is essentially single-handed; almost every merged PR in this window carries the same author.

Read the full spatsoc trajectory →

excluder vs spatsoc: editorial side-by-side

E
excluder
ANALYTICS
0.0

A Qualtrics data-cleaning package that has been in maintenance mode since its CRAN acceptance.

◆ Current state

excluder marks, checks, and excludes online-survey rows that fail quality criteria — duplicate responses, suspicious IP or geolocation, screen resolution, completion duration, preview rows. The mark_*/check_*/exclude_* verb trio and the column-renaming helpers are the whole public surface. Recent releases are dependency chasing and test robustness rather than new exclusion criteria.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is stable and its maintenance load comes from things it does not control: the {iptools} package leaving CRAN, {tidyselect} deprecating the .data pronoun, IP-geolocation tests breaking when the underlying address data shifts. Much of that work is about staying installable, not about better exclusions. Note that several of these entries were backfilled into the feed within the same two-minute window and are not in version order.

◆ Prediction

The next release will most likely be another dependency or CRAN-check response rather than a new exclusion criterion, following the pattern of the last three.

S
spatsoc
ANALYTICS
0.0

One maintainer, one or two new collective-motion metrics per release, for two years straight

◆ Current state

spatsoc turns animal relocation data into spatial and social groupings — dyads, fission-fusion events, group centroids — and the recent history is a metronomic accretion of collective-motion measures on top of that base. Since late 2024 nearly every release has added one or two: polarization, direction to leader, position along the group axis, directional correlation delay, edge alignment, edge zones. Development is essentially single-handed; almost every merged PR in this window carries the same author.

◆ Where it's heading

The December 2025 release changes register. Alongside three new calc_distance / calc_direction / calc_centroid functions and an internal assertion family, it deprecates the `projection` argument in favour of `crs` and lands a round of checks and tests explicitly staged ahead of a new spatial interface. Read together, that is a package finishing its metric catalogue and starting to rework the coordinate-handling layer underneath it to match modern R-spatial conventions — the same evolution that made it drop its startup warning back in 0.2.7.

◆ Prediction

The next release is likely the spatial-interface rework the 0.2.12 test and assertion work was staged for, with `projection` moving from deprecated to removed. Feature additions should slow while that lands.

Alternatives to excluder and spatsoc

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either excluder or spatsoc.

See all excluder alternatives → · See all spatsoc alternatives →

Recent activity from excluder and spatsoc

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 8mo agospatsoccalc_* functions added; projection deprecated ahead of a spatial rework
  2. 10mo agospatsocEdge zones and edge direction added; centroid NA handling fixed
  3. 11mo agospatsocEdge alignment metric added
  4. 1y agospatsocLeader edge delay added; units dependency moves to a CRAN release
  5. 1y agoexcluderInternet-dependent tests and examples made conditional
  6. 1y agospatsocDirectional correlation delay added; longlat direction bug fixed
  7. 1y agospatsocLeadership and group-axis position measures added
  8. 2y agoexcluderqualtrics_fetch2 dataset and tidyselect deprecation fixes
  9. 3y agoexcluderCRAN acceptance and graceful IP-lookup failure
  10. 3y agoexcluderdplyr 1.0.8 across()/is.na() compatibility fix
  11. 3y agoexcluderuse_labels(), rename_columns(), and orientation-agnostic resolution
  12. 3y agoexcluderSwaps iptools for ipaddress

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between excluder and spatsoc?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. excluder and spatsoc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is excluder better than spatsoc?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. excluder and spatsoc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to excluder?

Top excluder alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "excluder alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/excluder for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to spatsoc?

Top spatsoc alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "spatsoc alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/spatsoc for the full list with editorial commentary on each.