← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

epiflows vs mizer

A side-by-side editorial comparison of epiflows and mizer — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

epiflows vs mizer: at a glance

Featureepiflowsmizer
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.05.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr, epidemiology, dormant, maintenancesize-spectrum-modelling, marine-ecology, numerical-methods, extension-framework
Last editorial update1h ago3h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is epiflows?

epiflows has shipped four releases in eight years, none of which changed the code.

epiflows predicts the spread of infectious disease along population flows between locations, and it is effectively dormant. The whole visible history spans 2018 to 2026 in four entries: the first CRAN release, a Zenodo archival tag, a Roxygen patch whose notes state the functionality is unchanged, and a 2026 release replacing deprecated ggplot2 and tibble calls. No entry describes new epidemiological capability.

Read the full epiflows trajectory →

What is mizer?

After two and a half years dormant, mizer shipped three major versions in seven weeks.

The size-spectrum fish modelling package sat at 2.5.0 from December 2023 until June 2026, then released 3.0.0, 3.1.0 and 3.2.0 in the space of seven weeks. The three releases divide cleanly: 3.0.0 added biological realism through a diffusion term in the McKendrick-von Foerster equation, 3.1.0 added an opt-in second-order numerical scheme in size, and 3.2.0 rebuilt how species and resource parameters are set. Backward compatibility is handled carefully throughout — the experimental scheme is off by default and the first-order path is byte-identical to previous versions.

Read the full mizer trajectory →

epiflows vs mizer: editorial side-by-side

E
epiflows
ANALYTICS
0.0

epiflows has shipped four releases in eight years, none of which changed the code.

◆ Current state

epiflows predicts the spread of infectious disease along population flows between locations, and it is effectively dormant. The whole visible history spans 2018 to 2026 in four entries: the first CRAN release, a Zenodo archival tag, a Roxygen patch whose notes state the functionality is unchanged, and a 2026 release replacing deprecated ggplot2 and tibble calls. No entry describes new epidemiological capability.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is being kept installable rather than developed. The one recent release is dependency maintenance contributed from outside, which is the pattern for RECON-era epidemiology packages that have outlived their original project funding. Two separate entries are both labelled version 0.2.1, so even the version history is not a reliable guide to what changed.

◆ Prediction

Any further releases will most likely be more deprecation cleanup to keep the package on CRAN; there is nothing in the record suggesting active development has resumed.

M
mizer
ANALYTICS
5.0

After two and a half years dormant, mizer shipped three major versions in seven weeks.

◆ Current state

The size-spectrum fish modelling package sat at 2.5.0 from December 2023 until June 2026, then released 3.0.0, 3.1.0 and 3.2.0 in the space of seven weeks. The three releases divide cleanly: 3.0.0 added biological realism through a diffusion term in the McKendrick-von Foerster equation, 3.1.0 added an opt-in second-order numerical scheme in size, and 3.2.0 rebuilt how species and resource parameters are set. Backward compatibility is handled carefully throughout — the experimental scheme is off by default and the first-order path is byte-identical to previous versions.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run through the 3.x line. The first is numerical: diffusion, then higher-order accuracy in both size and time, with explicit warnings that enabling them shifts diagnostics and may require recalibration. The second is making the package composable — extensions now work regardless of load order, and parameter assignment propagates to the derived rate arrays instead of being silently discarded. That second thread reads as the more consequential one: the 3.2.0 notes describe scalar edits that previously vanished and now accumulate, which is the kind of fix that changes what published model configurations actually computed.

◆ Prediction

Expect the experimental second-order scheme to move toward default-on once recalibration guidance exists, and the patch line to keep absorbing the documentation and website gaps that 3.2.1 started on.

Alternatives to epiflows and mizer

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either epiflows or mizer.

See all epiflows alternatives → · See all mizer alternatives →

Recent activity from epiflows and mizer

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 15d agomizerpkgdown index fix for a man page added after the 3.2.0 build
  2. 25d agomizerParameter assignment rebuilds derived rates; extensions compose in any load order
  3. 1mo agomizerOpt-in second-order accurate scheme in the size variable
  4. 2mo agomizerDiffusion enters the McKendrick-von Foerster equation, ending a two-year gap
  5. 5mo agoepiflowsDeprecated ggplot2 and tibble calls replaced
  6. 2y agomizerExternal encounter rate, and a split between given and calculated parameters
  7. 3y agoepiflowsRoxygen patch for CRAN checks
  8. 3y agomizerw_inf renamed to w_max to separate maximum size from von Bertalanffy asymptotic size
  9. 7y agoepiflowsFirst Zenodo archival tag
  10. 8y agoepiflowsFirst CRAN release

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between epiflows and mizer?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. mizer is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is epiflows better than mizer?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. mizer is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to epiflows?

Top epiflows alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "epiflows alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/epiflows-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to mizer?

Top mizer alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mizer alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mizer-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.