tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
epidemics vs webmockr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of epidemics and webmockr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
epidemics vs webmockr: at a glance
What is epidemics?
epidemics swapped its C++ engine for odin — and quietly inverted how contact matrices must be passed.
epidemics ships composable compartmental model structures — default SEIR-V, Vacamole, diphtheria and Ebola — with classes for populations, interventions and vaccination campaigns. After more than two years without a release, 0.5.0 landed in July 2026 carrying both an engine migration and a breaking input-convention change. Maintainership moved to a new lead back in 0.4.0.
What is webmockr?
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
epidemics vs webmockr: editorial side-by-side
epidemics
3.8ANALYTICS
epidemics swapped its C++ engine for odin — and quietly inverted how contact matrices must be passed.
◆ Current state
epidemics ships composable compartmental model structures — default SEIR-V, Vacamole, diphtheria and Ebola — with classes for populations, interventions and vaccination campaigns. After more than two years without a release, 0.5.0 landed in July 2026 carrying both an engine migration and a breaking input-convention change. Maintainership moved to a new lead back in 0.4.0.
◆ Where it's heading
The package's history is a sequence of deliberate breaking releases: 0.2.0 renamed every model function and vectorised the ODE models, 0.3.0 restructured the Ebola model into two levels and made replicates the default, and 0.5.0 rewrites the compiled core. The direction is toward a smaller, more declarative model definition layer with the numerical work delegated to a dedicated tool.
◆ Prediction
With the default, Vacamole and diphtheria systems now declared in odin, the Ebola model is the obvious remaining candidate for the same treatment.
webmockr
0.0ANALYTICS
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
◆ Current state
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
◆ Where it's heading
Two arcs run in sequence. The first is coverage — multiple queued responses in 0.7.0, basic auth mocking, async through crul, then httr2 — building out what can be stubbed. The second, starting with 2.0.0, is correctness and independence: stubs are now deleted if an error occurs mid-construction rather than lingering half-built, partial matching arrives for bodies and queries, and the dependency graph is pruned release by release. The 2.2.0 split from vcr landed within a minute of crul's release taking mocking control into its own clients.
◆ Prediction
RequestPattern is documented as still exported in 2.1.0 but slated for removal, so the next major release is where that lands. Expect continued dependency pruning rather than new client support — the three clients that exist are already covered.
Alternatives to epidemics and webmockr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either epidemics or webmockr.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all epidemics alternatives → · See all webmockr alternatives →
Recent activity from epidemics and webmockr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 25d agoepidemicsODE models migrate to odin; contact matrices must no longer be transposed ⚡
- 1y agowebmockrvcr dependency severed
- 1y agowebmockrInternal classes unexported; crul becomes an optional dependency
- 1y agowebmockrFailed stub construction cleans up; partial matching extends to bodies and queries
- 2y agowebmockrhttr2 joins httr and crul as a supported client ⚡
- 2y agoepidemicsPeak timing and scenario comparison helpers; negative-susceptible bug fixed
- 2y agoepidemicsEbola model accepts vector inputs and defaults to 100 replicates
- 2y agoepidemicsODE models vectorised; every model function renamed
- 2y agoepidemicsFirst release: four composable compartmental model structures
- 3y agowebmockrQueued responses, body matching and integer status codes fixed
- 3y agowebmockrRegex URI matching fixed
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between epidemics and webmockr?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. epidemics is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 3.8 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is epidemics better than webmockr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. epidemics is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 3.8 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to epidemics?
Top epidemics alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "epidemics alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/epidemics for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to webmockr?
Top webmockr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webmockr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webmockr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.