tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
EDIutils vs webmockr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of EDIutils and webmockr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:ropensci
EDIutils vs webmockr: at a glance
What is EDIutils?
The EDI data client is being dragged through its repository's identity-system migration.
EDIutils is the R client for the Environmental Data Initiative repository. The last two releases are both consequences of changes at EDI rather than in the package: 2.0.0 rewired authentication for the new EDI Identity and Access Manager and made Distinguished Names defunct in favour of EDI-IDs, and 2.1.0 handles the deprecation of the old auth token. Earlier releases were small bug fixes against repository outages and endpoint changes.
What is webmockr?
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
EDIutils vs webmockr: editorial side-by-side
EDIutils
0.0ANALYTICS
The EDI data client is being dragged through its repository's identity-system migration.
◆ Current state
EDIutils is the R client for the Environmental Data Initiative repository. The last two releases are both consequences of changes at EDI rather than in the package: 2.0.0 rewired authentication for the new EDI Identity and Access Manager and made Distinguished Names defunct in favour of EDI-IDs, and 2.1.0 handles the deprecation of the old auth token. Earlier releases were small bug fixes against repository outages and endpoint changes.
◆ Where it's heading
This is a client whose roadmap belongs to its server. Every meaningful release tracks something EDI changed — a deprecated endpoint, a resource outage breaking CRAN checks, and now a whole identity system — and the package's job is to absorb the churn while keeping the R interface stable. The 2.0.0 break was handled by pointing users at where to find their new EDI-ID rather than by papering over the change.
◆ Prediction
Expect continued follow-through on the IAM migration as the old auth token is fully retired, and further releases keyed to EDI service changes rather than to new client features.
webmockr
0.0ANALYTICS
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
◆ Current state
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
◆ Where it's heading
Two arcs run in sequence. The first is coverage — multiple queued responses in 0.7.0, basic auth mocking, async through crul, then httr2 — building out what can be stubbed. The second, starting with 2.0.0, is correctness and independence: stubs are now deleted if an error occurs mid-construction rather than lingering half-built, partial matching arrives for bodies and queries, and the dependency graph is pruned release by release. The 2.2.0 split from vcr landed within a minute of crul's release taking mocking control into its own clients.
◆ Prediction
RequestPattern is documented as still exported in 2.1.0 but slated for removal, so the next major release is where that lands. Expect continued dependency pruning rather than new client support — the three clients that exist are already covered.
Alternatives to EDIutils and webmockr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either EDIutils or webmockr.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all EDIutils alternatives → · See all webmockr alternatives →
Recent activity from EDIutils and webmockr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 3mo agoEDIutilsGraceful handling for the deprecated auth token
- 7mo agoEDIutilsEDI-IDs replace Distinguished Names as authentication moves to IAM ⚡
- 1y agowebmockrvcr dependency severed
- 1y agowebmockrInternal classes unexported; crul becomes an optional dependency
- 1y agowebmockrFailed stub construction cleans up; partial matching extends to bodies and queries
- 2y agowebmockrhttr2 joins httr and crul as a supported client ⚡
- 2y agoEDIutilsDeprecated archive endpoint fixed
- 3y agowebmockrQueued responses, body matching and integer status codes fixed
- 3y agoEDIutilsCRAN check fixed after EDI repository outage
- 3y agowebmockrRegex URI matching fixed
- 4y agoEDIutilsCharacter encoding bug fixed in a dependency path
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between EDIutils and webmockr?
Both compete on the same themes — ropensci — within Analytics. EDIutils and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is EDIutils better than webmockr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. EDIutils and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to EDIutils?
Top EDIutils alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "EDIutils alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ediutils for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to webmockr?
Top webmockr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webmockr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webmockr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.