tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
EDIutils vs r2rtf
A side-by-side editorial comparison of EDIutils and r2rtf — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
EDIutils vs r2rtf: at a glance
What is EDIutils?
The EDI data client is being dragged through its repository's identity-system migration.
EDIutils is the R client for the Environmental Data Initiative repository. The last two releases are both consequences of changes at EDI rather than in the package: 2.0.0 rewired authentication for the new EDI Identity and Access Manager and made Distinguished Names defunct in favour of EDI-IDs, and 2.1.0 handles the deprecation of the old auth token. Earlier releases were small bug fixes against repository outages and endpoint changes.
What is r2rtf?
The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely
r2rtf builds the RTF tables, listings and figures that go into clinical study reports, and its recent releases have been about widening who and what it can serve rather than changing how tables are composed. The 1.2.0 release added internationalization — a SimSun font path for Chinese characters plus hyphenation control — and 1.3.0 followed with write_docx() and write_html(), turning the LibreOffice conversion the package had documented into exported functions.
EDIutils vs r2rtf: editorial side-by-side
EDIutils
0.0ANALYTICS
The EDI data client is being dragged through its repository's identity-system migration.
◆ Current state
EDIutils is the R client for the Environmental Data Initiative repository. The last two releases are both consequences of changes at EDI rather than in the package: 2.0.0 rewired authentication for the new EDI Identity and Access Manager and made Distinguished Names defunct in favour of EDI-IDs, and 2.1.0 handles the deprecation of the old auth token. Earlier releases were small bug fixes against repository outages and endpoint changes.
◆ Where it's heading
This is a client whose roadmap belongs to its server. Every meaningful release tracks something EDI changed — a deprecated endpoint, a resource outage breaking CRAN checks, and now a whole identity system — and the package's job is to absorb the churn while keeping the R interface stable. The 2.0.0 break was handled by pointing users at where to find their new EDI-ID rather than by papering over the change.
◆ Prediction
Expect continued follow-through on the IAM migration as the old auth token is fully retired, and further releases keyed to EDI service changes rather than to new client features.
r2rtf
0.0ANALYTICS
The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely
◆ Current state
r2rtf builds the RTF tables, listings and figures that go into clinical study reports, and its recent releases have been about widening who and what it can serve rather than changing how tables are composed. The 1.2.0 release added internationalization — a SimSun font path for Chinese characters plus hyphenation control — and 1.3.0 followed with write_docx() and write_html(), turning the LibreOffice conversion the package had documented into exported functions.
◆ Where it's heading
Two threads run through the window. One is output reach: RTF remains the composition target, but the artifacts that come out of it now include DOCX and HTML, and page numbering can be made table-relative across multi-page tables. The other is durability under a moving R and font stack — the ANSI/Unicode converter was rebuilt, the LaTeX mapping table generated from code rather than shipped as sysdata, unlist() usage fixed for R 4.5, and graphics-device leaks that produced stray Rplots.pdf closed off.
◆ Prediction
Having exported DOCX and HTML conversion, the likely next step is filling in what those formats lose relative to RTF — pagination and footnote fidelity are the obvious gaps. The i18n path currently covers Chinese only, so additional font families are the other plausible direction.
Alternatives to EDIutils and r2rtf
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either EDIutils or r2rtf.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all EDIutils alternatives → · See all r2rtf alternatives →
Recent activity from EDIutils and r2rtf
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 3mo agoEDIutilsGraceful handling for the deprecated auth token
- 7mo agoEDIutilsEDI-IDs replace Distinguished Names as authentication moves to IAM ⚡
- 7mo agor2rtfDOCX and HTML output become exported functions
- 11mo agor2rtfChinese character support arrives via an i18n font path ⚡
- 1y agor2rtfText colour fixed for figures encoded into RTF
- 1y agor2rtfFootnote handling fixed for R 4.5.0
- 1y agor2rtfUnicode converter rebuilt and mapping table made inspectable
- 2y agor2rtfUTF-8 conversion fix and LibreOffice 7.6 support
- 2y agoEDIutilsDeprecated archive endpoint fixed
- 3y agoEDIutilsCRAN check fixed after EDI repository outage
- 4y agoEDIutilsCharacter encoding bug fixed in a dependency path
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between EDIutils and r2rtf?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. EDIutils and r2rtf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is EDIutils better than r2rtf?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. EDIutils and r2rtf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to EDIutils?
Top EDIutils alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "EDIutils alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ediutils for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to r2rtf?
Top r2rtf alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "r2rtf alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/r2rtf for the full list with editorial commentary on each.