← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

EDIutils vs fellingdater

A side-by-side editorial comparison of EDIutils and fellingdater — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:ropenscir-package

EDIutils vs fellingdater: at a glance

FeatureEDIutilsfellingdater
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesropensci, r-package, api-client, ecologydendrochronology, crossdating, archaeology, ropensci
Last editorial update2h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is EDIutils?

The EDI data client is being dragged through its repository's identity-system migration.

EDIutils is the R client for the Environmental Data Initiative repository. The last two releases are both consequences of changes at EDI rather than in the package: 2.0.0 rewired authentication for the new EDI Identity and Access Manager and made Distinguished Names defunct in favour of EDI-IDs, and 2.1.0 handles the deprecation of the old auth token. Earlier releases were small bug fixes against repository outages and endpoint changes.

Read the full EDIutils trajectory →

What is fellingdater?

Went from estimating felling dates to doing the crossdating that produces them.

fellingdater estimates when a tree was felled from sapwood measurements, the core inference in dendrochronological dating of timber. Version 1.0.0 passed rOpenSci review with that scope, and the 2024 releases were mostly about the accompanying JOSS paper and user-supplied sapwood datasets. Version 1.2.0 changed the package's remit substantially, adding an entire trs_* family for tree-ring series handling: crossdating with multiple statistical measures, the Hollstein and Baillie-Pilcher t-value transformations, parallel variation percentages, synthetic series generation, and dated-series plotting.

Read the full fellingdater trajectory →

EDIutils vs fellingdater: editorial side-by-side

E
EDIutils
ANALYTICS
0.0

The EDI data client is being dragged through its repository's identity-system migration.

◆ Current state

EDIutils is the R client for the Environmental Data Initiative repository. The last two releases are both consequences of changes at EDI rather than in the package: 2.0.0 rewired authentication for the new EDI Identity and Access Manager and made Distinguished Names defunct in favour of EDI-IDs, and 2.1.0 handles the deprecation of the old auth token. Earlier releases were small bug fixes against repository outages and endpoint changes.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a client whose roadmap belongs to its server. Every meaningful release tracks something EDI changed — a deprecated endpoint, a resource outage breaking CRAN checks, and now a whole identity system — and the package's job is to absorb the churn while keeping the R interface stable. The 2.0.0 break was handled by pointing users at where to find their new EDI-ID rather than by papering over the change.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued follow-through on the IAM migration as the old auth token is fully retired, and further releases keyed to EDI service changes rather than to new client features.

F
fellingdater
ANALYTICS
0.0

Went from estimating felling dates to doing the crossdating that produces them.

◆ Current state

fellingdater estimates when a tree was felled from sapwood measurements, the core inference in dendrochronological dating of timber. Version 1.0.0 passed rOpenSci review with that scope, and the 2024 releases were mostly about the accompanying JOSS paper and user-supplied sapwood datasets. Version 1.2.0 changed the package's remit substantially, adding an entire trs_* family for tree-ring series handling: crossdating with multiple statistical measures, the Hollstein and Baillie-Pilcher t-value transformations, parallel variation percentages, synthetic series generation, and dated-series plotting.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has expanded backwards along the workflow. It began at the last step — given dated series, estimate the felling date — and 1.2.0 added the step before it, establishing those dates by crossdating in the first place. Version 1.2.1 is early polish on that new surface: axis control, non-syntactic column names, encoding safety in read_fh(). The direction is a single package covering the chain from raw ring widths to a felling-date estimate.

◆ Prediction

Expect the trs_* family to keep accumulating polish and additional crossdating statistics, since it is barely a year old and 1.2.1 was already fixing its plotting and top_n behaviour. Whether the two halves of the package get unified into one workflow interface is the open question the entries do not answer.

Alternatives to EDIutils and fellingdater

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either EDIutils or fellingdater.

See all EDIutils alternatives → · See all fellingdater alternatives →

Recent activity from EDIutils and fellingdater

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3mo agoEDIutilsGraceful handling for the deprecated auth token
  2. 4mo agofellingdaterPolish for the crossdating plots and file reader
  3. 7mo agoEDIutilsEDI-IDs replace Distinguished Names as authentication moves to IAM
  4. 1y agofellingdaterAdds a full crossdating and tree-ring analysis toolkit
  5. 1y agofellingdaterUser-supplied sapwood data works across all functions
  6. 1y agofellingdaterFixes fd_report() with user-defined sapwood files
  7. 2y agofellingdaterJOSS paper accepted; citation updated
  8. 2y agofellingdaterAdds a workflow vignette ahead of JOSS submission
  9. 2y agoEDIutilsDeprecated archive endpoint fixed
  10. 3y agoEDIutilsCRAN check fixed after EDI repository outage
  11. 4y agoEDIutilsCharacter encoding bug fixed in a dependency path

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between EDIutils and fellingdater?

Both compete on the same themes — ropensci, r-package — within Analytics. EDIutils and fellingdater are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is EDIutils better than fellingdater?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. EDIutils and fellingdater are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to EDIutils?

Top EDIutils alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "EDIutils alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ediutils for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to fellingdater?

Top fellingdater alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fellingdater alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fellingdater for the full list with editorial commentary on each.