← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

edibble vs segregatr

A side-by-side editorial comparison of edibble and segregatr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

edibble vs segregatr: at a glance

Featureedibblesegregatr
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesexperimental-design, grammar-of-design, reproducibility, simulationstatistical-genetics, pedigree-analysis, variant-classification, pedsuite
Last editorial update30m ago41m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is edibble?

A grammar for experimental design that learned to compose designs and track its own provenance.

edibble expresses experimental designs declaratively — units, treatments, records and their allotments — rather than calling a canned design function. Since 1.0.0 its internals run on a Provenance object that records the commands used to build a design, and 1.1.0 added conditional treatments, design composition and a separated simulation step. Recent work has focused on designs constructed from existing data rather than from scratch.

Read the full edibble trajectory →

What is segregatr?

A segregation-analysis tool that keeps widening which pedigrees it can actually handle.

segregatr computes full-likelihood Bayes factors for variant segregation in families, built on pedtools and part of the wider pedsuite ecosystem. Its releases are infrequent but each one lifts a structural restriction: loops, recessive and X-linked models, liability classes, and most recently a proband-free variant of the score. The companion shinyseg app gives the same machinery a clinical front end.

Read the full segregatr trajectory →

edibble vs segregatr: editorial side-by-side

E
edibble
ANALYTICS
0.0

A grammar for experimental design that learned to compose designs and track its own provenance.

◆ Current state

edibble expresses experimental designs declaratively — units, treatments, records and their allotments — rather than calling a canned design function. Since 1.0.0 its internals run on a Provenance object that records the commands used to build a design, and 1.1.0 added conditional treatments, design composition and a separated simulation step. Recent work has focused on designs constructed from existing data rather than from scratch.

◆ Where it's heading

Development has moved from vocabulary to composition. Early releases established the core grammar; 1.0.0 replaced the internal R6 machinery with a Provenance object that tracks both internal and external commands, which is what lets a design carry its own construction history. On that foundation 1.1.0 added the ability to add two designs together, express conditional treatment structures, and split simulation specification from execution. The 2025 release turns toward a different entry point — wiring up level edges and unit attributes when an edibble object is built from data that already exists, rather than from a design declared up front.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued work on designs derived from existing data, since that is where the last release concentrated and it is the path least covered by the declarative grammar.

S
segregatr
ANALYTICS
0.0

A segregation-analysis tool that keeps widening which pedigrees it can actually handle.

◆ Current state

segregatr computes full-likelihood Bayes factors for variant segregation in families, built on pedtools and part of the wider pedsuite ecosystem. Its releases are infrequent but each one lifts a structural restriction: loops, recessive and X-linked models, liability classes, and most recently a proband-free variant of the score. The companion shinyseg app gives the same machinery a clinical front end.

◆ Where it's heading

The through-line is coverage of awkward real-world pedigrees rather than new statistics. Loops were handled for the core score in 0.3.0 and then extended to liability classes in 0.4.0, so the same structural capability is being pushed through the codebase feature by feature. The 2025 release moves in a different direction, relaxing the requirement for a designated proband. Development is slow and steady, roughly annual, and tracks its pedtools dependency closely.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to continue relaxing modelling constraints — the pattern of retrofitting each new capability across loops, liability classes and inheritance models is unfinished — rather than expanding beyond segregation scoring.

Alternatives to edibble and segregatr

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either edibble or segregatr.

See all edibble alternatives → · See all segregatr alternatives →

Recent activity from edibble and segregatr

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 11mo agosegregatrProband-free variant of the FLB score
  2. 1y agoedibbleBetter handling of designs built from existing data
  3. 2y agosegregatrLiability classes now work in looped pedigrees
  4. 2y agoedibbleedibble 1.1.0
  5. 2y agoedibbleInternals rebuilt on a command-tracking Provenance object
  6. 3y agoedibbleS3 consistency and citation modernised
  7. 3y agosegregatrsegregatr 0.3.0
  8. 3y agoedibbleRd files fixed for HTML5 compatibility
  9. 4y agoedibbleInitial release

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between edibble and segregatr?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. edibble and segregatr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is edibble better than segregatr?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. edibble and segregatr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to edibble?

Top edibble alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "edibble alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/edibble for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to segregatr?

Top segregatr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "segregatr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/segregatr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.