← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

ecodive vs rphylopic

A side-by-side editorial comparison of ecodive and rphylopic — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

ecodive vs rphylopic: at a glance

Featureecodiverphylopic
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmicrobiome, ecology, diversity-metrics, unifracphylogenetics, data-visualization, r-package, ggplot2
Last editorial update1h ago3h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is ecodive?

ecodive rebuilt itself into a broad diversity-metric library, breaking as it went

ecodive computes alpha and beta diversity metrics for ecological and microbiome count data, including phylogenetic measures like Faith's PD and the UniFrac family. The 2.0.0 rewrite expanded it from a handful of metrics to roughly fourteen alpha and thirty beta measures while flipping the expected input orientation to samples-as-rows. Subsequent releases have been spent settling the normalisation interface that expansion exposed.

Read the full ecodive trajectory →

What is rphylopic?

The R package that puts organism silhouettes on plots keeps widening where they can be drawn.

rphylopic fetches PhyloPic silhouettes and places them into R graphics — base plots, ggplot2 layers, legends, and now phylogenetic trees and igraph networks. The 1.x line has been consistent about two things: adding a new plotting context per release, and steadily replacing its early sizing vocabulary with explicit width and height arguments. Attribution handling is unusually developed for a package this size, with permalinks and per-image credit built into the retrieval functions.

Read the full rphylopic trajectory →

ecodive vs rphylopic: editorial side-by-side

E
ecodive
ANALYTICS
0.0

ecodive rebuilt itself into a broad diversity-metric library, breaking as it went

◆ Current state

ecodive computes alpha and beta diversity metrics for ecological and microbiome count data, including phylogenetic measures like Faith's PD and the UniFrac family. The 2.0.0 rewrite expanded it from a handful of metrics to roughly fourteen alpha and thirty beta measures while flipping the expected input orientation to samples-as-rows. Subsequent releases have been spent settling the normalisation interface that expansion exposed.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a package that made its breaking changes deliberately and in a cluster. After 2.0.0 reoriented input and removed the weighted parameter, 2.1.0 superseded rescale with norm, and 2.2.6 changed norm's default from percent to none and removed it from some beta functions entirely. That last one matters more than it reads: normalisation defaults silently change the numbers a metric returns, and the direction is toward making the user state their choice rather than inheriting one.

◆ Prediction

With the metric surface broad and the normalisation interface now explicit, expect the next releases to stabilise — documentation and edge-case handling around CLR and rarefaction rather than another interface break.

R
rphylopic
ANALYTICS
0.0

The R package that puts organism silhouettes on plots keeps widening where they can be drawn.

◆ Current state

rphylopic fetches PhyloPic silhouettes and places them into R graphics — base plots, ggplot2 layers, legends, and now phylogenetic trees and igraph networks. The 1.x line has been consistent about two things: adding a new plotting context per release, and steadily replacing its early sizing vocabulary with explicit width and height arguments. Attribution handling is unusually developed for a package this size, with permalinks and per-image credit built into the retrieval functions.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is expanding the set of places a silhouette can appear rather than changing what the package does. Base plots came first, then ggplot2 aesthetics and legend glyphs, then trees, then network vertices via an igraph shape registered automatically when both packages load. The other running thread is defensive maintenance against upstream churn: retries on failed API calls, fixes for ggplot2 4.0.0, and now an in-memory cache so repeated calls stop hammering the PhyloPic API. The ysize and size deprecation, opened in 1.5.0, is now complete and the arguments are scheduled for removal.

◆ Prediction

The deprecated ysize and size arguments look set to be removed in the next release, and on the pattern of the last four, another plotting context is a likelier addition than a change to the retrieval layer.

Alternatives to ecodive and rphylopic

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ecodive or rphylopic.

See all ecodive alternatives → · See all rphylopic alternatives →

Recent activity from ecodive and rphylopic

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agorphylopicSilhouettes become igraph vertices; API responses cached
  2. 4mo agoecodiveNormalisation now defaults to none, with CLR zero warnings
  3. 7mo agoecodiveecodive 2.2.2
  4. 8mo agorphylopicBase R phylogenies gain silhouette annotation
  5. 10mo agoecodiverescale superseded by norm; crash fixes after the 2.0.0 rewrite
  6. 10mo agoecodive2.0.0 expands to ~14 alpha and ~30 beta diversity metrics
  7. 1y agorphylopicExplicit width and height replace the old sizing arguments
  8. 2y agorphylopicSilhouette legends and attribution permalinks
  9. 2y agorphylopicSilhouette resolution helper and safer colour defaults
  10. 2y agorphylopicRendering dependencies bumped for grImport2 and rsvg

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between ecodive and rphylopic?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. ecodive and rphylopic are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is ecodive better than rphylopic?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ecodive and rphylopic are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to ecodive?

Top ecodive alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ecodive alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ecodive for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rphylopic?

Top rphylopic alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rphylopic alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rphylopic for the full list with editorial commentary on each.