← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

e2tree vs ggstats

A side-by-side editorial comparison of e2tree and ggstats — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

e2tree vs ggstats: at a glance

Featuree2treeggstats
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesexplainable-ai, ensemble-methods, decision-trees, r-packageggplot2, data-visualization, likert, regression-models
Last editorial update3h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is e2tree?

The explainable-ensemble-tree package now measures whether its own explanations are faithful.

e2tree builds a single interpretable tree that approximates a fitted ensemble, working from the proximity structure the ensemble induces between observations. The 1.0.0 release added the piece that had been missing: a Goodness of Interpretability index quantifying how well the approximating tree reconstructs the ensemble's own proximity matrix, with a permutation test for significance. Interactive visualisation and a C++ backend with OpenMP parallelism arrived alongside, and support now spans ranger and CatBoost as well as the original targets.

Read the full e2tree trajectory →

What is ggstats?

ggstats keeps widening what a coefficient or Likert plot can be

ggstats extends ggplot2 with statistical plotting: model coefficient plots, Likert and diverging bar charts, proportion geometries and the helpers that make them behave. Recent releases have added an experimental gglikert_side(), left and right total columns for gglikert(), and survey-object support across the Likert family. Development is steady and CRAN-paced, with releases every two to three months.

Read the full ggstats trajectory →

e2tree vs ggstats: editorial side-by-side

E
e2tree
ANALYTICS
0.0

The explainable-ensemble-tree package now measures whether its own explanations are faithful.

◆ Current state

e2tree builds a single interpretable tree that approximates a fitted ensemble, working from the proximity structure the ensemble induces between observations. The 1.0.0 release added the piece that had been missing: a Goodness of Interpretability index quantifying how well the approximating tree reconstructs the ensemble's own proximity matrix, with a permutation test for significance. Interactive visualisation and a C++ backend with OpenMP parallelism arrived alongside, and support now spans ranger and CatBoost as well as the original targets.

◆ Where it's heading

Development has moved from producing an explanation to defending it. The GoI index and its permutation test change the package's claim from here is a tree that resembles your ensemble to here is how closely it resembles it and whether that could have happened by chance — the question a reviewer asks of any surrogate model. Around that, the work is engineering: the proximity matrix construction moved from R-level parallel loops into C++ with thread-level parallelism, and recent releases have been absorbing the awkwardness of supporting multiple ensemble backends, where a multi-class CatBoost objective returns a score matrix where a vector was expected. Interactive visNetwork output and standalone HTML export point at explanations meant to be shared rather than only inspected.

◆ Prediction

Given how much recent effort has gone into per-backend adapters, expect further work on ensemble compatibility; the entries do not indicate whether the interpretability index is heading toward comparing surrogate trees against each other.

G
ggstats
ANALYTICS
0.0

ggstats keeps widening what a coefficient or Likert plot can be

◆ Current state

ggstats extends ggplot2 with statistical plotting: model coefficient plots, Likert and diverging bar charts, proportion geometries and the helpers that make them behave. Recent releases have added an experimental gglikert_side(), left and right total columns for gglikert(), and survey-object support across the Likert family. Development is steady and CRAN-paced, with releases every two to three months.

◆ Where it's heading

Two long-running threads. The coefficient side has been consolidating — ggcoef_multinom() and ggcoef_multicomponents() soft-deprecated in favour of a unified ggcoef_model() with group_by, plus new ggcoef_dodged() and ggcoef_faceted() variants. The Likert side keeps expanding outward instead, absorbing survey objects, total columns and side-by-side layouts. Underneath both is a steady tax of ggplot2 and vctrs compatibility work, including tracking the geom_errorbarh() deprecation in ggplot2 4.0.0.

◆ Prediction

Expect gglikert_side() to lose its experimental status once its interface settles, and the deprecated multinomial entry points to be removed in a future release now that ggcoef_model() covers their cases.

Alternatives to e2tree and ggstats

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either e2tree or ggstats.

See all e2tree alternatives → · See all ggstats alternatives →

Recent activity from e2tree and ggstats

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3mo agoe2treeCatBoost multi-class and loss-function handling repaired
  2. 4mo agoe2treeA significance-tested measure of explanation fidelity
  3. 5mo agoggstatsgglikert_side() and total columns for Likert plots
  4. 7mo agoggstatsLikert functions accept survey objects
  5. 11mo agoggstatsTable output for ggcoef_compare(); x-axis limits harmonised
  6. 1y agoe2treeranger models supported
  7. 1y agoggstatsggstats 0.10.0
  8. 1y agoggstatsCoefficient plots unified around ggcoef_model() with grouping
  9. 1y agoggstatsDiverging and Likert geoms redesigned; connector geoms added

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between e2tree and ggstats?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. e2tree and ggstats are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is e2tree better than ggstats?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. e2tree and ggstats are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to e2tree?

Top e2tree alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "e2tree alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/e2tree for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to ggstats?

Top ggstats alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ggstats alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ggstats for the full list with editorial commentary on each.