randomwalk
randomwalk spent every release getting an R simulation to run in the browser, not on a server.
Comparison · Analytics
e2tree vs fillpattern
A side-by-side editorial comparison of e2tree and fillpattern — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
e2tree vs fillpattern: at a glance
What is e2tree?
The explainable-ensemble-tree package now measures whether its own explanations are faithful.
e2tree builds a single interpretable tree that approximates a fitted ensemble, working from the proximity structure the ensemble induces between observations. The 1.0.0 release added the piece that had been missing: a Goodness of Interpretability index quantifying how well the approximating tree reconstructs the ensemble's own proximity matrix, with a permutation test for significance. Interactive visualisation and a C++ backend with OpenMP parallelism arrived alongside, and support now spans ranger and CatBoost as well as the original targets.
What is fillpattern?
Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes
fillpattern provides pattern fills — stripes, bricks, dots — for ggplot2 and base R graphics, aimed at figures that must stay legible in greyscale or to colour-blind readers. The 1.0.3 release is mostly defensive: size modifier strings ending in a colon no longer swap width for height, modify_size() reports invalid units instead of crashing and understands in, inches and cm, and a background colour bug in scale_fill_pattern() is fixed. The minimum R version rises to 4.2.0 for recent graphics engine features.
e2tree vs fillpattern: editorial side-by-side
e2tree
0.0ANALYTICS
The explainable-ensemble-tree package now measures whether its own explanations are faithful.
◆ Current state
e2tree builds a single interpretable tree that approximates a fitted ensemble, working from the proximity structure the ensemble induces between observations. The 1.0.0 release added the piece that had been missing: a Goodness of Interpretability index quantifying how well the approximating tree reconstructs the ensemble's own proximity matrix, with a permutation test for significance. Interactive visualisation and a C++ backend with OpenMP parallelism arrived alongside, and support now spans ranger and CatBoost as well as the original targets.
◆ Where it's heading
Development has moved from producing an explanation to defending it. The GoI index and its permutation test change the package's claim from here is a tree that resembles your ensemble to here is how closely it resembles it and whether that could have happened by chance — the question a reviewer asks of any surrogate model. Around that, the work is engineering: the proximity matrix construction moved from R-level parallel loops into C++ with thread-level parallelism, and recent releases have been absorbing the awkwardness of supporting multiple ensemble backends, where a multi-class CatBoost objective returns a score matrix where a vector was expected. Interactive visNetwork output and standalone HTML export point at explanations meant to be shared rather than only inspected.
◆ Prediction
Given how much recent effort has gone into per-backend adapters, expect further work on ensemble compatibility; the entries do not indicate whether the interpretability index is heading toward comparing surrogate trees against each other.
fillpattern
0.0ANALYTICS
Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes
◆ Current state
fillpattern provides pattern fills — stripes, bricks, dots — for ggplot2 and base R graphics, aimed at figures that must stay legible in greyscale or to colour-blind readers. The 1.0.3 release is mostly defensive: size modifier strings ending in a colon no longer swap width for height, modify_size() reports invalid units instead of crashing and understands in, inches and cm, and a background colour bug in scale_fill_pattern() is fixed. The minimum R version rises to 4.2.0 for recent graphics engine features.
◆ Where it's heading
Development is slow and entirely reactive to how the string-based size interface fails. The pattern across releases is the same: a user hits an edge — very small fill areas in 1.0.2, malformed unit strings in 1.0.3 — and the fix is either a graceful fallback or a clearer error. Leaning on R's newer graphics engine rather than reimplementing pattern rendering keeps the package small at the cost of raising its version floor.
◆ Prediction
Expect further releases to stay in the same register: parsing and validation fixes for the size and unit interface, with the pattern set itself unlikely to change.
Alternatives to e2tree and fillpattern
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either e2tree or fillpattern.
fastml
fastml added survival modelling and leakage-proof resampling, moving past classification and regression.
abclass
abclass built out angle-based classifiers in 2022, then went quiet except for CRAN upkeep.
churon
churon is spending its entire release history getting a Rust ONNX binding through CRAN.
firatheme
firatheme woke up after four years and started fixing what ggplot2 changed underneath it.
bagyo
bagyo reached CRAN as a Philippine tropical cyclone dataset, with its tags stamped out of order.
See all e2tree alternatives → · See all fillpattern alternatives →
Recent activity from e2tree and fillpattern
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 3mo agoe2treeCatBoost multi-class and loss-function handling repaired
- 4mo agoe2treeA significance-tested measure of explanation fidelity ⚡
- 6mo agofillpatternSize string parsing fixed; invalid units now report instead of crash
- 1y agoe2treeranger models supported
- 2y agofillpatternSmall fill areas no longer crash; min_size falls back to solid
- 2y agofillpatternfillpattern 1.0.1
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between e2tree and fillpattern?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. e2tree and fillpattern are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is e2tree better than fillpattern?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. e2tree and fillpattern are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to e2tree?
Top e2tree alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "e2tree alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/e2tree for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to fillpattern?
Top fillpattern alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fillpattern alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fillpattern for the full list with editorial commentary on each.