exametrika
A test-theory package that grew into a graphical-model toolkit, now spending its releases paying down the API debt that growth created.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
Dust vs projoint
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Dust and projoint — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Dust vs projoint: at a glance
What is Dust?
Dust doubles down on MCP-native agents with multi-model routing and enterprise guardrails.
Dust is building an MCP-native agent platform with broad model coverage and growing enterprise depth. The May cadence shows parallel investment in agent capability (vision via MCP tools, context compaction, frame editing/export) and operational readiness (audit logs, SIEM streaming, protocol migrations). Mobile is getting a voice-first input redesign.
What is projoint?
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.
Dust vs projoint: editorial side-by-side
Dust
8.8INFRA · APIS
Dust doubles down on MCP-native agents with multi-model routing and enterprise guardrails.
◆ Current state
Dust is building an MCP-native agent platform with broad model coverage and growing enterprise depth. The May cadence shows parallel investment in agent capability (vision via MCP tools, context compaction, frame editing/export) and operational readiness (audit logs, SIEM streaming, protocol migrations). Mobile is getting a voice-first input redesign.
◆ Where it's heading
The product is converging on agents-in-the-enterprise via MCP, with multi-model routing as table stakes. MCP V2 migrations and image returns from MCP tools point to the protocol becoming Dust's integration backbone. The model-refresh cadence — three vendors in 48 hours — suggests model routing is now a core competency, not a feature.
◆ Prediction
Expect more MCP V2 connector migrations and richer MCP return types beyond images. The voice-first mobile input bar likely precedes a deeper voice-mode agent surface.
projoint
2.5INFRA · APIS
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
◆ Current state
projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.
◆ Where it's heading
The maintainer is hardening the path from raw Qualtrics export to estimate, which is where conjoint analysis quietly goes wrong. Three separate releases fix that path: dropped respondent-level weights in organize_data(), repeated-task reshaping in reshape_projoint(), and choice-to-profile mapping in 1.1.3. Each fix now arrives with regression tests and stricter validation rather than just a patch, and 1.1.3 adds an explicit .choice_map so the mapping is auditable instead of inferred.
◆ Prediction
Expect the validation-and-regression-test pattern to keep extending across the import path, with releases continuing to arrive in bursts around CRAN submission rather than on a cadence.
Alternatives to Dust and projoint
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Dust or projoint.
nuggets
nuggets keeps compounding on the 2.0 rewrite — more pattern families, lighter install.
eratosthenes
eratosthenes spends 0.1.0 hardening inputs rather than adding chronology methods.
dqcheckr
dqcheckr adds drift analysis, then removes the YAML a user had to hand-write.
lifecontingencies
An actuarial mainstay spends its releases on CI plumbing, not on new mathematics.
EDAForge
EDAForge is a data-quality auditor renamed mid-flight, still finding its CRAN footing.
See all Dust alternatives → · See all projoint alternatives →
Recent activity from Dust and projoint
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 17d agoprojointExplicit .choice_map guards choice-to-profile mapping
- 1mo agoprojointCRAN submission housekeeping for DESCRIPTION and examples
- 1mo agoprojointCRAN formatting pass; minor make_projoint_data() fix
- 1mo agoprojointreshape_projoint() repeated-task bug fixed; validation tightened
- 1mo agoprojointCitation metadata updated with the CRAN DOI
- 2mo agoDustCompact mobile input bar goes voice-first
- 2mo agoDustFrames export as PDF or PNG
- 2mo agoDustInline text editing in frames
- 3mo agoDustGemini 3.5 Flash now available
- 3mo agoDustGrok 4.3 upgrade and Anthropic model migrations
- 3mo agoDustAsana MCP update
- 5mo agoprojointorganize_data() no longer drops respondent-level weights
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Dust and projoint?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Dust is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 8.8 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Dust better than projoint?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Dust is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 8.8 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Dust?
Top Dust alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Dust alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/dust for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to projoint?
Top projoint alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "projoint alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/projoint for the full list with editorial commentary on each.