tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
dfms vs webmockr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of dfms and webmockr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:ropensci
dfms vs webmockr: at a glance
What is dfms?
Peer-reviewed, feature-complete, and now able to hand its models to other forecasting engines.
dfms estimates dynamic factor models in R, the workhorse for nowcasting economic activity from ragged, mixed-frequency data. The package worked through the Banbura and Modugno (2014) specification in stages — quarterly variables in 0.3.0, AR(1) idiosyncratic errors combined with mixed frequency in 0.4.0 — then declared 1.0.0 feature-complete on completing rOpenSci peer review, adding news decomposition to attribute forecast revisions to specific data releases. Version 1.0.1 adds convert(), which exports fitted models to dlm or KFAS state-space objects.
What is webmockr?
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
dfms vs webmockr: editorial side-by-side
dfms
0.0ANALYTICS
Peer-reviewed, feature-complete, and now able to hand its models to other forecasting engines.
◆ Current state
dfms estimates dynamic factor models in R, the workhorse for nowcasting economic activity from ragged, mixed-frequency data. The package worked through the Banbura and Modugno (2014) specification in stages — quarterly variables in 0.3.0, AR(1) idiosyncratic errors combined with mixed frequency in 0.4.0 — then declared 1.0.0 feature-complete on completing rOpenSci peer review, adding news decomposition to attribute forecast revisions to specific data releases. Version 1.0.1 adds convert(), which exports fitted models to dlm or KFAS state-space objects.
◆ Where it's heading
The package has finished the implementation programme it set out in its 2023 vignette and is now working on the edges: interoperability with other state-space packages rather than more estimation methods of its own. The convert() function is the clearest signal — instead of implementing smoothing and prediction intervals natively, it hands the model to packages that already have them. The rOpenSci move also puts it on a review-backed, documented footing that research users can cite.
◆ Prediction
Expect continued interoperability and diagnostic work rather than new estimators, since the maintainer has explicitly scoped the package as complete. Bug fixes against RcppArmadillo releases will likely remain the other recurring driver.
webmockr
0.0ANALYTICS
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
◆ Current state
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
◆ Where it's heading
Two arcs run in sequence. The first is coverage — multiple queued responses in 0.7.0, basic auth mocking, async through crul, then httr2 — building out what can be stubbed. The second, starting with 2.0.0, is correctness and independence: stubs are now deleted if an error occurs mid-construction rather than lingering half-built, partial matching arrives for bodies and queries, and the dependency graph is pruned release by release. The 2.2.0 split from vcr landed within a minute of crul's release taking mocking control into its own clients.
◆ Prediction
RequestPattern is documented as still exported in 2.1.0 but slated for removal, so the next major release is where that lands. Expect continued dependency pruning rather than new client support — the three clients that exist are already covered.
Alternatives to dfms and webmockr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either dfms or webmockr.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all dfms alternatives → · See all webmockr alternatives →
Recent activity from dfms and webmockr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agodfmsconvert() exports models to dlm and KFAS state-space objects
- 6mo agodfms1.0: rOpenSci review passed, news decomposition added ⚡
- 6mo agodfmsMixed-frequency estimation gains AR(1) idiosyncratic errors
- 9mo agodfmsC++ compatibility with RcppArmadillo 15.0.2
- 1y agodfmsFixes estimation with a single quarterly variable
- 1y agowebmockrvcr dependency severed
- 1y agowebmockrInternal classes unexported; crul becomes an optional dependency
- 1y agodfmsAdds mixed-frequency estimation via quarterly.vars
- 1y agowebmockrFailed stub construction cleans up; partial matching extends to bodies and queries
- 2y agowebmockrhttr2 joins httr and crul as a supported client ⚡
- 3y agowebmockrQueued responses, body matching and integer status codes fixed
- 3y agowebmockrRegex URI matching fixed
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between dfms and webmockr?
Both compete on the same themes — ropensci — within Analytics. dfms and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is dfms better than webmockr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. dfms and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to dfms?
Top dfms alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "dfms alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/dfms for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to webmockr?
Top webmockr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webmockr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webmockr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.