← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

Depot vs rush

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Depot and rush — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Depot vs rush: at a glance

FeatureDepotrush
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score6.32.5
Sparks · 30d10
Top themesci-cd, build-acceleration, test-intelligence, git-hostingmlr3, distributed-computing, redis, fault-tolerance
Last editorial update13h ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →

What is Depot?

Depot keeps absorbing the CI stack — tests, networking, runners, now its own git host.

Depot has moved well past build caching. Test results reached general availability in July with org-wide flaky, slow, and recurring failure analytics plus timing-based shard splitting; Sherlock's AI analysis became available on any run rather than only failed ones; and CI jobs can join a Tailscale tailnet to reach private services. The runner fleet now defaults to macOS 26 on M4 hardware, Depot CI understands GitHub stacked pull requests, and Depot Code — a diskless git server backed by blob storage — entered private beta.

Read the full Depot trajectory →

What is rush?

Rush spent 2026 making distributed task ownership correct, starting with a breaking 1.0.

rush is the Redis-backed distributed computing backend behind mlr3's parallel tuning: workers pull tasks, push results and are tracked through heartbeats. Since 1.0.0 in March 2026 it has shipped five releases in four months, almost all correcting how tasks and workers are owned and identified under failure. The most recent lets each worker start in its own mirai call so it can spawn local daemons.

Read the full rush trajectory →

Depot vs rush: editorial side-by-side

D
Depot
INFRA · APIS
6.3

Depot keeps absorbing the CI stack — tests, networking, runners, now its own git host.

◆ Current state

Depot has moved well past build caching. Test results reached general availability in July with org-wide flaky, slow, and recurring failure analytics plus timing-based shard splitting; Sherlock's AI analysis became available on any run rather than only failed ones; and CI jobs can join a Tailscale tailnet to reach private services. The runner fleet now defaults to macOS 26 on M4 hardware, Depot CI understands GitHub stacked pull requests, and Depot Code — a diskless git server backed by blob storage — entered private beta.

◆ Where it's heading

The pattern is absorbing each adjacent piece of the pipeline that Depot's position already gives it data about. It runs the builds, so it owns test timing, so it can balance shards; it runs the jobs, so it can diagnose them; it hosts the runners, so it can wire private networking into them. Depot Code extends the same logic upstream to source hosting, which would close the loop between repository and runner. A quieter parallel thread keeps moving SDK- and dashboard-only settings into the CLI, stated explicitly as making projects configurable by agents and scripts.

◆ Prediction

Depot Code widening past private beta and binding more tightly to CI is the move the rest of the window sets up. The test work is also positioned to go from reporting to selection — skipping tests a change cannot affect — since Depot now holds the timing and failure history that would require, though the entries stop short of saying so.

R
rush
INFRA · APIS
2.5

Rush spent 2026 making distributed task ownership correct, starting with a breaking 1.0.

◆ Current state

rush is the Redis-backed distributed computing backend behind mlr3's parallel tuning: workers pull tasks, push results and are tracked through heartbeats. Since 1.0.0 in March 2026 it has shipped five releases in four months, almost all correcting how tasks and workers are owned and identified under failure. The most recent lets each worker start in its own mirai call so it can spawn local daemons.

◆ Where it's heading

The through-line is moving responsibility from the controller to the worker. 1.0.0 rewrote the task lifecycle and dropped the seed mechanism; 1.2.0 moved fail_tasks(), finish_tasks(), pop_task() and push_running_tasks() from Rush onto RushWorker so only the worker that ran a task can mark it done, and gave worker ids random suffixes so they cannot collide. 1.1.0 had already removed phantom failed tasks when a worker crashes between evaluations.

◆ Prediction

With ownership and identity settled, the remaining pressure points are heartbeat and lost-worker detection; expect the next releases to tighten failure recovery rather than add API surface.

Alternatives to Depot and rush

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Depot or rush.

See all Depot alternatives → · See all rush alternatives →

Recent activity from Depot and rush

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 4d agoDepotmacOS 26 is now the default macOS version for GitHub Actions runners
  2. 11d agoDepotDepot CI now supports native GitHub stacked pull requests
  3. 14d agoDepotSet cache retention when creating a project with --cache-policy-keep-days
  4. 15d agoDepotView and edit project details from the Depot CLI
  5. 16d agoDepotTest results are now generally available
  6. 21d agorushWorkers start in their own mirai call so they can create local daemons
  7. 24d agoDepotAI analysis available for all Depot CI workflows and jobs
  8. 1mo agorushTask lifecycle moves onto the worker; worker ids can no longer collide
  9. 3mo agorushPhantom failed tasks and missed results fixed
  10. 4mo agorushSmaller Redis payloads and vector-valued task parameters
  11. 4mo agorushRush 1.0 rewrites the task lifecycle and drops the seed mechanism
  12. 9mo agorushwait_for_workers() can target a count or specific ids

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Depot and rush?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Depot is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 2.5), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Depot better than rush?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Depot is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 2.5), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Depot?

Top Depot alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Depot alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/depot for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rush?

Top rush alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rush alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rush for the full list with editorial commentary on each.