tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
dendroNetwork vs webmockr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of dendroNetwork and webmockr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:ropensci
dendroNetwork vs webmockr: at a glance
What is dendroNetwork?
Six releases, six identical bodies — the feed carries the package abstract instead of release notes
dendroNetwork builds networks of dendrochronological series from similarity between tree-ring measurements, applies community detection to find matching material, and hands the result to Cytoscape for visualisation. That description is all the feed provides: every one of the six visible releases carries the same package abstract as its body, with no record of what changed in any of them. Version 0.5.5 in July 2025 is the most recent.
What is webmockr?
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
dendroNetwork vs webmockr: editorial side-by-side
dendroNetwork
0.0ANALYTICS
Six releases, six identical bodies — the feed carries the package abstract instead of release notes
◆ Current state
dendroNetwork builds networks of dendrochronological series from similarity between tree-ring measurements, applies community detection to find matching material, and hands the result to Cytoscape for visualisation. That description is all the feed provides: every one of the six visible releases carries the same package abstract as its body, with no record of what changed in any of them. Version 0.5.5 in July 2025 is the most recent.
◆ Where it's heading
What the timestamps show is more informative than the text. Versions 0.5.0 through 0.5.3 were all published within two minutes of each other on 12 April 2024, and in descending version order, which is the signature of a release history backfilled in one pass rather than four separate releases. Real releases follow at 0.5.4 a fortnight later and 0.5.5 fifteen months after that. Development is slow and, on this evidence, undocumented.
◆ Prediction
No prediction is supportable from these entries — none of them describe a change. Any read on where this package is heading would need the NEWS file or the commit history rather than the feed.
webmockr
0.0ANALYTICS
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
◆ Current state
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
◆ Where it's heading
Two arcs run in sequence. The first is coverage — multiple queued responses in 0.7.0, basic auth mocking, async through crul, then httr2 — building out what can be stubbed. The second, starting with 2.0.0, is correctness and independence: stubs are now deleted if an error occurs mid-construction rather than lingering half-built, partial matching arrives for bodies and queries, and the dependency graph is pruned release by release. The 2.2.0 split from vcr landed within a minute of crul's release taking mocking control into its own clients.
◆ Prediction
RequestPattern is documented as still exported in 2.1.0 but slated for removal, so the next major release is where that lands. Expect continued dependency pruning rather than new client support — the three clients that exist are already covered.
Alternatives to dendroNetwork and webmockr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either dendroNetwork or webmockr.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all dendroNetwork alternatives → · See all webmockr alternatives →
Recent activity from dendroNetwork and webmockr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1y agodendroNetworkdendroNetwork 0.5.5
- 1y agowebmockrvcr dependency severed
- 1y agowebmockrInternal classes unexported; crul becomes an optional dependency
- 1y agowebmockrFailed stub construction cleans up; partial matching extends to bodies and queries
- 2y agowebmockrhttr2 joins httr and crul as a supported client ⚡
- 2y agodendroNetworkdendroNetwork 0.5.4
- 2y agodendroNetworkdendroNetwork 0.5.0
- 2y agodendroNetworkdendroNetwork 0.5.1
- 2y agodendroNetworkdendroNetwork 0.5.2
- 2y agodendroNetworkdendroNetwork 0.5.3
- 3y agowebmockrQueued responses, body matching and integer status codes fixed
- 3y agowebmockrRegex URI matching fixed
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between dendroNetwork and webmockr?
Both compete on the same themes — ropensci — within Analytics. dendroNetwork and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is dendroNetwork better than webmockr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. dendroNetwork and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to dendroNetwork?
Top dendroNetwork alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "dendroNetwork alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/dendronetwork for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to webmockr?
Top webmockr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webmockr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webmockr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.