cIRT
A choice-based IRT model published once in 2019 and kept compiling ever since
A side-by-side editorial comparison of ddpcr and lazyeval — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
A decade-old droplet PCR analysis package woken up for one compatibility release
ddpcr reads droplet digital PCR data exported from Bio-Rad's QuantaSoft, classifies droplets and ships a Shiny interface over the analysis. It has been on CRAN since 2016 alongside an F1000Research paper. The last ten years of releases are almost entirely about keeping pace with QuantaSoft export formats and with churn in its own R dependencies.
A package retired in 2017 just got rewritten against R's public C API.
lazyeval was the tidyverse's pre-rlang non-standard evaluation layer, formally set aside in 2017 when tidy evaluation replaced it. After eight and a half years without a release, 0.2.3 arrives as a compliance rewrite: the implementation now uses R's public C API, and the release note states it may differ from the historical one in subtle ways. Nothing about the package's role has changed.
ddpcr reads droplet digital PCR data exported from Bio-Rad's QuantaSoft, classifies droplets and ships a Shiny interface over the analysis. It has been on CRAN since 2016 alongside an F1000Research paper. The last ten years of releases are almost entirely about keeping pace with QuantaSoft export formats and with churn in its own R dependencies.
This is a maintained-not-developed package, and the release history shows it plainly: a burst of real work through 2016 and 2017, then long silences broken by releases whose stated purpose is staying on CRAN. The 2026 release fits the same shape but does more than the 2023 pair did, adding support for a QuantaSoft variant and finally retiring dplyr code written against a tidy evaluation style that has been outdated for years.
Nothing in the entries points to new analysis capability; the pattern suggests the package surfaces again only when a QuantaSoft export change or a dependency deprecation forces it.
lazyeval was the tidyverse's pre-rlang non-standard evaluation layer, formally set aside in 2017 when tidy evaluation replaced it. After eight and a half years without a release, 0.2.3 arrives as a compliance rewrite: the implementation now uses R's public C API, and the release note states it may differ from the historical one in subtle ways. Nothing about the package's role has changed.
This is a dormancy revival driven entirely from outside, R core tightening what counts as the public C API forces packages using older internals to be rewritten or be archived. lazyeval is still a dependency deep in older package trees, so keeping it installable matters more than developing it. The caveat about subtle behavioural differences is the notable part: a package nobody is developing has changed behaviour in ways its release note declines to enumerate.
Expect no further development, only additional compliance releases if R core tightens the C API again.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ddpcr or lazyeval.
A choice-based IRT model published once in 2019 and kept compiling ever since
The R engine behind MetaboAnalyst closes the gap from raw spectra to biological interpretation
Rebuilding SAS's formatting layer in R, one format specification at a time
Standardised coefficients for models where standardising everything is wrong — but the feed only links out
Stream-network spatial models learning to run on data that no longer fits in memory
Bioconductor's installer, frozen at 1.30.x and tuned almost entirely through environment variables
See all ddpcr alternatives → · See all lazyeval alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
Both compete on the same themes — maintenance — within Analytics. ddpcr and lazyeval are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ddpcr and lazyeval are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top ddpcr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ddpcr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ddpcr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top lazyeval alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "lazyeval alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/lazyeval for the full list with editorial commentary on each.