tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
datefixR vs rlistings
A side-by-side editorial comparison of datefixR and rlistings — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
datefixR vs rlistings: at a glance
What is datefixR?
The messy-date parser rewrote its core in Rust and came out 300x faster.
datefixR standardizes inconsistently formatted dates — the kind that arrive from spreadsheets and hand-entered clinical or survey data, with mixed separators, ambiguous orders, missing components, and month names in whatever language the source used. Version 2.0.0 rewrote the parsing core in Rust, reporting over 300x throughput against previous versions through fastpath handling of common formats and parallel column processing via a cores argument. Version 2.0.1 then spent itself cleaning up after that rewrite, restoring ordinal indicator support, stopping malformed dates from being silently cast to NA, and reinstating error messages that had gone missing.
What is rlistings?
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
rlistings renders clinical-trial subject listings and paginates them for regulatory output, sitting alongside rtables on the shared formatters engine. The releases in this window are dominated by pagination correctness: repeated key columns across pages, splitting by a variable, ordered-factor handling, column gaps, and font metrics. Development is a large rotating contributor set inside the insightsengineering organisation.
datefixR vs rlistings: editorial side-by-side
datefixR
0.0ANALYTICS
The messy-date parser rewrote its core in Rust and came out 300x faster.
◆ Current state
datefixR standardizes inconsistently formatted dates — the kind that arrive from spreadsheets and hand-entered clinical or survey data, with mixed separators, ambiguous orders, missing components, and month names in whatever language the source used. Version 2.0.0 rewrote the parsing core in Rust, reporting over 300x throughput against previous versions through fastpath handling of common formats and parallel column processing via a cores argument. Version 2.0.1 then spent itself cleaning up after that rewrite, restoring ordinal indicator support, stopping malformed dates from being silently cast to NA, and reinstating error messages that had gone missing.
◆ Where it's heading
Two long arcs meet here. The first is localization: Russian, Indonesian, German, Spanish month abbreviations, and experimental Roman numeral months accumulated release by release, with full translation of user-facing messages treated as a goal rather than a bonus. The second is the migration off R for the parsing hot path — internals began moving to C++ around 1.3.1 before the Rust rewrite replaced that work entirely. The 2.0.1 regressions show the cost of that move, since behavior that was implicit in the R implementation had to be re-specified.
◆ Prediction
The Rust core is one release into stabilization and 2.0.1 was entirely regression repair, so expect further correctness fixes against pre-2.0.0 behavior before any new format support lands.
rlistings
0.0ANALYTICS
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
◆ Current state
rlistings renders clinical-trial subject listings and paginates them for regulatory output, sitting alongside rtables on the shared formatters engine. The releases in this window are dominated by pagination correctness: repeated key columns across pages, splitting by a variable, ordered-factor handling, column gaps, and font metrics. Development is a large rotating contributor set inside the insightsengineering organisation.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is progressively delegating pagination to formatters rather than implementing it — paginate_listing() was refactored to call formatters' paginate_to_mpfs() directly, and truetype font support arrived through a new formatters API. That reduces duplicated logic but ties the package's page-break behaviour to a dependency it shares with rtables. Feature work beyond pagination is thin: better error messages for unsupported column classes, a cheatsheet.
◆ Prediction
Expect pagination fidelity to remain the focus, with changes arriving as formatters exposes more of its layout machinery rather than as rlistings-native features.
Alternatives to datefixR and rlistings
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either datefixR or rlistings.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
datasetjson
datasetjson rebuilt its object model to track the CDISC Dataset-JSON 1.1 schema.
See all datefixR alternatives → · See all rlistings alternatives →
Recent activity from datefixR and rlistings
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 3mo agodatefixRRust rewrite regressions repaired, silent NA casting stopped
- 11mo agodatefixRParsing core rewritten in Rust for a 300x speedup ⚡
- 1y agorlistingsError and message handling for difftime and zero-row listings
- 1y agorlistingsTrueType font support and col_gap in pagination
- 1y agodatefixRIndonesian month names and translations added
- 2y agorlistingssplit_into_pages_by_var() and pagination moved onto formatters
- 2y agodatefixR'ene' and 'ener' recognized as January
- 3y agodatefixRRussian localization, Roman numeral months, Windows freeze fix
- 3y agodatefixRExcel leap-year offset and single-digit day fixes
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between datefixR and rlistings?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. datefixR and rlistings are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is datefixR better than rlistings?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. datefixR and rlistings are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to datefixR?
Top datefixR alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "datefixR alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/datefixr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to rlistings?
Top rlistings alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rlistings alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rlistings for the full list with editorial commentary on each.