tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
datapack vs webmockr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of datapack and webmockr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
datapack vs webmockr: at a glance
What is datapack?
The DataONE bundler learned to edit packages in 2017 and has coasted on that ever since
datapack assembles heterogeneous data files and metadata into a single transportable bundle, serialised as an OAI-ORE resource map and BagIt archive, for deposit into repositories like DataONE. Its functional surface settled with the 1.3.x line, which made assembled packages editable rather than write-once. Since then the releases have been sparse and defensive: SHA-256 as the default checksum in 1.4.0, BagIt spec conformance in 1.4.1, and a 2025 patch that states outright it contains no new features.
What is webmockr?
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
datapack vs webmockr: editorial side-by-side
datapack
0.0ANALYTICS
The DataONE bundler learned to edit packages in 2017 and has coasted on that ever since
◆ Current state
datapack assembles heterogeneous data files and metadata into a single transportable bundle, serialised as an OAI-ORE resource map and BagIt archive, for deposit into repositories like DataONE. Its functional surface settled with the 1.3.x line, which made assembled packages editable rather than write-once. Since then the releases have been sparse and defensive: SHA-256 as the default checksum in 1.4.0, BagIt spec conformance in 1.4.1, and a 2025 patch that states outright it contains no new features.
◆ Where it's heading
The arc runs from assembly to correctness of the resulting archive. Later releases keep tightening the metadata the resource map must carry — dc:creator always present, dcterms:modified always updated, the package correctly flagged as modified after any access-policy change — because a bundle whose provenance record is subtly wrong is worse than one that fails outright. The three-year gap between 1.4.1 and 1.4.2, and the latter's CRAN-note content, place this package firmly in preservation.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next release, if any, to be another CRAN-compliance patch rather than functional work. The 1.4.2 note that it contains no new features is the clearest statement in the feed about where this package sits.
webmockr
0.0ANALYTICS
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
◆ Current state
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
◆ Where it's heading
Two arcs run in sequence. The first is coverage — multiple queued responses in 0.7.0, basic auth mocking, async through crul, then httr2 — building out what can be stubbed. The second, starting with 2.0.0, is correctness and independence: stubs are now deleted if an error occurs mid-construction rather than lingering half-built, partial matching arrives for bodies and queries, and the dependency graph is pruned release by release. The 2.2.0 split from vcr landed within a minute of crul's release taking mocking control into its own clients.
◆ Prediction
RequestPattern is documented as still exported in 2.1.0 but slated for removal, so the next major release is where that lands. Expect continued dependency pruning rather than new client support — the three clients that exist are already covered.
Alternatives to datapack and webmockr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either datapack or webmockr.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all datapack alternatives → · See all webmockr alternatives →
Recent activity from datapack and webmockr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 10mo agodatapackCRAN documentation and CI cleanup
- 1y agowebmockrvcr dependency severed
- 1y agowebmockrInternal classes unexported; crul becomes an optional dependency
- 1y agowebmockrFailed stub construction cleans up; partial matching extends to bodies and queries
- 2y agowebmockrhttr2 joins httr and crul as a supported client ⚡
- 3y agowebmockrQueued responses, body matching and integer status codes fixed
- 3y agowebmockrRegex URI matching fixed
- 4y agodatapackBagIt serialisation brought in line with the current spec
- 5y agodatapackSHA-256 becomes the default checksum algorithm
- 6y agodatapackResource map metadata guaranteed; removeRelationships() added
- 8y agodatapackupdateMetadata no longer drops package relationships
- 9y agodatapackAssembled data packages become editable in place ⚡
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between datapack and webmockr?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. datapack and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is datapack better than webmockr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. datapack and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to datapack?
Top datapack alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "datapack alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/datapack for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to webmockr?
Top webmockr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webmockr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webmockr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.