tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
datapack vs tern
A side-by-side editorial comparison of datapack and tern — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
datapack vs tern: at a glance
What is datapack?
The DataONE bundler learned to edit packages in 2017 and has coasted on that ever since
datapack assembles heterogeneous data files and metadata into a single transportable bundle, serialised as an OAI-ORE resource map and BagIt archive, for deposit into repositories like DataONE. Its functional surface settled with the 1.3.x line, which made assembled packages editable rather than write-once. Since then the releases have been sparse and defensive: SHA-256 as the default checksum in 1.4.0, BagIt spec conformance in 1.4.1, and a 2025 patch that states outright it contains no new features.
What is tern?
tern is migrating its entire analysis-function catalogue off make_afun(), one release at a time.
tern builds the clinical-trial tables, listings, and graphs layer on top of rtables — occurrence counts, survival summaries, ANCOVA, incidence rates, subgroup and biomarker tabulations. The visible work across the window is a systematic refactor: dozens of analysis functions rewritten to drop make_afun() and adopt a common analysis-function style driven by rtables' additional_fun_params. Feature additions ride along with it.
datapack vs tern: editorial side-by-side
datapack
0.0ANALYTICS
The DataONE bundler learned to edit packages in 2017 and has coasted on that ever since
◆ Current state
datapack assembles heterogeneous data files and metadata into a single transportable bundle, serialised as an OAI-ORE resource map and BagIt archive, for deposit into repositories like DataONE. Its functional surface settled with the 1.3.x line, which made assembled packages editable rather than write-once. Since then the releases have been sparse and defensive: SHA-256 as the default checksum in 1.4.0, BagIt spec conformance in 1.4.1, and a 2025 patch that states outright it contains no new features.
◆ Where it's heading
The arc runs from assembly to correctness of the resulting archive. Later releases keep tightening the metadata the resource map must carry — dc:creator always present, dcterms:modified always updated, the package correctly flagged as modified after any access-policy change — because a bundle whose provenance record is subtly wrong is worse than one that fails outright. The three-year gap between 1.4.1 and 1.4.2, and the latter's CRAN-note content, place this package firmly in preservation.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next release, if any, to be another CRAN-compliance patch rather than functional work. The 1.4.2 note that it contains no new features is the clearest statement in the feed about where this package sits.
tern
0.0ANALYTICS
tern is migrating its entire analysis-function catalogue off make_afun(), one release at a time.
◆ Current state
tern builds the clinical-trial tables, listings, and graphs layer on top of rtables — occurrence counts, survival summaries, ANCOVA, incidence rates, subgroup and biomarker tabulations. The visible work across the window is a systematic refactor: dozens of analysis functions rewritten to drop make_afun() and adopt a common analysis-function style driven by rtables' additional_fun_params. Feature additions ride along with it.
◆ Where it's heading
This is a multi-release architectural migration, not incremental polish. Each release converts another batch of functions, and the count is large — roughly two dozen in the most recent entry alone, after a comparable batch the release before. Alongside it, the denom parameter is being threaded through counting functions and g_lineplot is accumulating layout control, both patterns of standardising arguments that previously varied per function.
◆ Prediction
The refactor should continue until the make_afun() dependency is gone entirely, with the remaining tabulate_* and biomarker functions the likely next batch; the entries give no date for completion.
Alternatives to datapack and tern
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either datapack or tern.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all datapack alternatives → · See all tern alternatives →
Recent activity from datapack and tern
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 10mo agodatapackCRAN documentation and CI cleanup
- 1y agoternTwo dozen more analysis functions drop make_afun() ⚡
- 1y agoterndenom threading, custom statistics, and compare_vars merged in
- 1y agoternRisk-difference columns for subgroup tables
- 2y agoterng_lineplot gains faceting and axis controls
- 4y agodatapackBagIt serialisation brought in line with the current spec
- 5y agodatapackSHA-256 becomes the default checksum algorithm
- 6y agodatapackResource map metadata guaranteed; removeRelationships() added
- 8y agodatapackupdateMetadata no longer drops package relationships
- 9y agodatapackAssembled data packages become editable in place ⚡
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between datapack and tern?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. datapack and tern are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is datapack better than tern?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. datapack and tern are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to datapack?
Top datapack alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "datapack alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/datapack for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to tern?
Top tern alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tern alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tern for the full list with editorial commentary on each.